0:52:03 Friday 19 September 2025

New Wof rules cause disbelief

Proposed changes to the Warrant of Fitness (WoF) laws has one Tauranga motorist in disbelief as older car owners will have to pay double what newer car owners pay.

Under the new changes cars built after January 1, 2000 will only be required to undergo a WoF test every year, while vehicles built before 2000 will continue to undergo six monthly tests.

People with cars built before 2000 will have to pay for a Wof test twice a year.

New cars will undergo an initial inspection followed by annual inspections once vehicles are three years old.

The changes, announced by the Government in January, are expected to save motorists up to $200million a year and will be in place by July 2014.

Tauranga resident Ross Grifiths cannot understand how new changes to the WoF system, made through the Land Transport Rule: Vehicle Standards Compliance 2002, will help reduce costs as older car owners will still have to pay a higher annual rate.

The cost of a WoF on a standard car in Tauranga and Mount Maunganui ranges between $35 and $52.

Although Ross owns a 2001 model car, he does not believe it is fair that older car users will effectively have to pay double what new car owners pay. He says the New Zealand Transport Agency's (NZTA's) template for reducing costs will not work.

'Everybody will be in the same boat. People will have to pay the same price as someone who only has to pay once a year.”

He says people cannot afford to buy a newer car just because WoF's are six monthly for older vehicles.

NZTA Waikato Bay of Plenty Regional Communications senior advisor Glenda Dobbyn admits older cars owners will have to pay double as a result of evolving safety features.

'If they are required to undertake six monthly warrants, yes they will be required to pay double.”

She says NZTA does not dictate the pricing strategies, rather the inspections companies, but says they are looking at the decision from a safety perspective.

'For us the reason is making sure the vehicles are up to a safe standard and we are saying vehicles 12 years or older don't have the same features as the newer vehicles.”

11 comments

Wake Up.

Posted on 03-04-2013 07:16 | By kiwiwayno

Wake Up Mr Griffiths. Nothing has changed. If you own a new vehicle now you only get WOF once a year anyway up until the time they are 3 years old. Its not like they are saying this is a totally new change - they are in fact extending it out to older vehicles. Somewhere along the line the reporter in this story also forgot to mention that fact!!! Another way to spin it - those with vehicles registered after 2001 save half the cost of warrant checks.......but that wouldnt be a headline grabbing story right!


Well Well gets deeper.

Posted on 03-04-2013 08:17 | By tabatha

All those people who willingly displayed those great vintage Cars lovingly restored over the Jazz weekend get pinged again as well as the people who enjoy and keep their older car up to scratch. This country is really going to the dogs or should we have a new term going to the donkeys.


SEEMS LIKE A GLASS HALF EMPTY

Posted on 03-04-2013 08:29 | By mattanddel

Does this not mean for owners of older cars nothing will change and owners of newer cars things will get cheaper?


What is the point of this complainer?

Posted on 03-04-2013 10:22 | By metallicite

Older cars will still have same 6 monthly check... no change. New cars will have yearly checks... move in line with rest of the world in not babying the population about looking after their cars. Yes WOF's will probably go up as newer cars will have less checks but the WOF guys cant justify too much of an increase as there will still be a good number of older cars on the road (a good stat to find out when reporting on an article like this would be the percentage of cars on our road that are older than 2000?) NZTA will have to monitor the situation and have some sort of incentive to keep the price similar as it is now otherwise there is no point to their plan!!


Great for some, Better for many, same for the rest

Posted on 03-04-2013 10:35 | By rfranzoi

But this has always been the case.. currently cars older than 6 years need to get a WOF every 6 months, and cars newer than 6 years get one annually. The changes make it to that more people get to only have to do a WOF once a year. The changes say that new cars get one and then only need another when it's 3 years old. Cars registered after 1 Jan 2000 move to annual inpections and cars registered before 1 Jan 2000 remain on 6 monthly. Everyone who has a car first registered after 1 Jan 2000 that is older than 6 years is going to benefit by this and I'm sure that's quite a lot of people.


cars

Posted on 03-04-2013 13:28 | By traceybjammet

personally I don't see a problem older cars benefit from more regular checks. People that have vintage and classic cars already keep things up to date and I am quite happy to do this and if it slowly weeds out all the junky old dungers on our roads all the better for safer roads


Once a year

Posted on 03-04-2013 13:35 | By South

newer car owners will potentially get a larger repairs bill than they might like as things escalate beyond a little, cheap to fix issue into something more serious over the longer time frame. Will there be more cars of that age without a WOF then while people save up for bigger repairs? Gummint's going to love the fines take on that.


Missing the point

Posted on 03-04-2013 17:54 | By Johnney

Modern car owners will be paying half, not older car owners paying double. Is this one persons disbelief!!!


There is no Ping

Posted on 03-04-2013 18:44 | By OB1

No one is going to pay more but some will pay less, tabatha, engauge brain before using your fingers


This law change is stuffwittery personified

Posted on 04-04-2013 09:24 | By RORTSCAM

All cars older than 3years should be checked 6monthly because it is a safety issue for yourself and other road users not a cost thing.Think about it bald tyres and brakes come to mind and in a year the condition of these can change dramatically/catastrophically especially with high mileages.I will still be getting my vehicles checked every 6 monthly as I value my life and other peoples lives.


good for businesses

Posted on 04-04-2013 13:13 | By gregor

A common sense move. Will save my business time and money. If people want higher wages, costs to businesses need to go down. This is positive in every way and practical.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.