Mutual admiration society

There has been plenty of flak recently on the very, very contentious City Partners issue. It's about time someone got to the bottom of the TCC City Partners Scheme which should be renamed TCC Mutual Admiration Society. In theory it could possibly work but having regard to human nature it doesn't – it's a one-way conduit and that never really benefits TCC ratepayers at all.
The figures are ludicrous, most of the inflow coming via TECT Bay Trust Perry Foundation and other similar charitable outfits; Secrecy is rife; Suspicions aroused and public distrust evident; Shuts down criticism both ways, TCC/City Partners.
Current Council stratagem is to demand ridiculously high payments for information (even to media) and TCC thinks that will diffuse public criticism. Wrong, think again! TCC demand for $78 per hour to provide LGOIMA details is obstructive and heads should roll including the City Partners facilitator who cannot readily access financial details.
Strangely, nearly all Councillors it seems support the misconception of so-called ‘benefits' accruing.

R Paterson, Matapihi.

2 comments

VERY Difficult

Posted on 23-03-2013 01:37 | By Crash test dummies

To find any benefits here for ratepayers, all indications are that it is a nite of a dog, any way it looks like one smells like a couple and consumes all on mass so obvious conclusion is that it must be.


LGOIMA

Posted on 25-03-2013 08:41 | By YOGI

Shocking rate, looks more like a fee or charge to discourage the request of what information should already be readily available and just needs copying.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.