Tauranga MP Sam Uffindell is calling for the council to be more transparent about chief executive Marty Grenfell’s sudden resignation.
The council and its leadership are refusing to answer questions including Grenfell’s reasons for resigning and whether he will receive a payout.
It released a statement on Tuesday evening announcing Grenfell had resigned and his last day would be tomorrow.
The announcement followed a publicly excluded emergency council meeting about the Davison report that afternoon.
The council-commissioned review into the fatal Mount Maunganui landslide, conducted by retired High Court judge Paul Davison, KC, revealed a litany of council failures leading up to the “preventable” disaster.
The council’s statement did not say whether Grenfell’s departure was related to the Davison review.
On Wednesday, the council refused to give any more information about what was discussed in the emergency meeting.
The agenda gave the only item as “Davison report implications” and said the public would be excluded under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act “to maintain legal professional privilege”.
Grenfell faced public calls to resign after the review was made public on August 19.
It was the first of several reviews into the deaths of six holidaymakers when a landslide hit a council-owned campground on January 22.
Davison found systemic issues within the council meant it missed opportunities over decades to address known landslide risks.

Retired High Court judge Paul Davison, KC, conducted the external review into the fatal Mauao landslide. Photo / Alyse Wright
He did not find that any individual’s acts or omissions caused the deaths, and his review did not set out to determine civil, criminal or disciplinary liability.
Davison declined to comment on Wednesday about Grenfell’s resignation.
Uffindell told Local Democracy Reporting Grenfell’s resignation was “a positive step forward”, but it should have happened sooner.
“The honourable thing to do would have been to resign on the 19th of August when the Davidson report came out.”
Uffindell said he had already heard from the community that they were concerned Grenfell would receive a payout.
He said the businesses around Mount Maunganui would “much rather some support or rates relief instead of seeing a golden handshake”.
Tauranga MP Sam Uffindell. Photo / Alex Cairns
“I don’t think that the council should be giving him a golden handshake to secure his resignation.”
Uffindell said there needed to be more transparency and accountability.
When asked if he believed Grenfell was asked to resign, he said it was a “dramatic shift in position”.
“On August 19, Grenfell said he was the best person to lead the organisation going forward, so it’s a significant change to go from that to resigning six weeks later.”
Grenfell has been the chief executive of the Tauranga City Council since 2018.
Grenfell was reappointed to the chief executive role in 2023 for five years.
The council’s draft Annual Report for 2025/26 valued his total remuneration at just under $600,000, including salary and benefits.
Unanswered questions
After Tuesday’s announcement, Local Democracy Reporting approached the council with several further questions regarding Grenfell’s resignation.
The council’s communications office replied within 40 minutes, saying: “Tauranga City Council will not be providing any further comment at this time.” It later also declined to respond to Uffindell’s comments.
Mayor Mahé Drysdale declined to comment further on the resignation, and Local Democracy Reporting was not able to reach Grenfell directly.
Along with questions about Grenfell’s reason for quitting – which were not covered in the prior council statement – and whether he would receive a payout, the council was asked why the notice period for his resignation was so short.
It was also asked whether the mayor or elected members asked Grenfell to resign.
How payouts work – lawyer
Dundas Street partner and employment lawyer Blair Scotland said employees did not need to give a reason for resigning and could be paid out their contractual notice period rather than work it.
He said additional payments could be negotiated as part of a confidential settlement, but this was not standard practice and some employers, including in the public sector, may refuse to pay more than contractual entitlements.
“There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach to such matters.”
Scotland said it was impossible to say how large any payout could be or what the suddenness of the departure might indicate.
He said a chief executive had heightened health and safety obligations.

Employment lawyer Blair Scotland.
These include to exercise due diligence around the organisation’s health and safety policies and processes.
“The chief executive is the most senior employee of the council and is a person who is an officer under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015.
“The buck stops with the chief executive, so to speak.”
Investigations ongoing
Independent investigations into the landslide tragedy continue.
Police are investigating and also making inquiries on behalf of the coroner.
A spokesperson said the investigation was active and police could not comment further.
WorkSafe had no update on its investigation into work health and safety at the campground. It has until February to file charges if it decides to prosecute.
The Government’s landslide inquiry report is due in February.
Under the Inquiries Act, it has no power to determine the civil, criminal, or disciplinary liability of any person, but can make findings of fault or recommendations that further steps be taken to determine liability.
Ayla Yeoman is a Local Democracy Reporting journalist based in Tauranga. She holds a Bachelor of Arts majoring in communications, politics and international relations from the University of Auckland, and has been a journalist since 2023.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.




17 comments
Time TCC
Posted on 01-10-2026 21:01 | By nerak
fully realised who pays their wages. Sure doesn't come from the sun/sea/sky.
To spell it out to any who don't actually understand, the ratepayers pay your wages/salaries, therefore we are your employers, or to spin that round, you are our employees.
Is that clear enough for you? So a decent amount of respect for your bosses is well overdue.
Therefore, Drysdale needs to understand his position, as our employee, does not give him the right to decline to comment. Who do you think you are? Sooner we are rid of you, too, the better, along with plenty of them behind closed doors, like The council’s communications office, how much of our money wasted on how many in this 'office'.
It should be public knowledge
Posted on 02-10-2026 07:43 | By The Sage
After everything that has happened, any payout needs to be made public. The Council would not assist any of the businesses in Adam’s Ave any rates relief, let alone payouts. I can see some real public unrest if it is not transparent.
In regards to Uffindel, I suppose he does have to start making some noise as elections are looming. What has he done for Tauranga so far? Apart from being vocal about the dodgy marina deal, I have not heard anything. Nothing came out of the noise over that marina deal.
Contract
Posted on 02-10-2026 09:01 | By Kancho
The problem is he was given a five year contract in 2023 by the Labour installed commissioners.. So I suspect he will paid out to the end plus . Outrageous but when you look at Councillors with the overspend on projects ,the sale of assets under valuation and expensive lease of the ivory tower and associated parking
As Shakespeare said "Something in the state of Denmark (Tauranga ) stinks"
Still more reports to come and the exposure of more so watch this space . Ratepayer further bills guaranteed to raise future rates as we already have a billion plus debt forecast . As Tenby said tantamount to insolvent if a business
$$$
Posted on 02-10-2026 09:47 | By Yadick
I'm sure all the businesses along Cameron Road that went bust and those continuing to struggle as they try to regain economic traction because of TCC's utter stupidity would be keenly interested to know if, and if so, how much of a payout this $600,000.00 a year man stands to potentially collect.
At the end of the day, he was payed to do a job he did not do. Any payout should be from him back to TCC and it should be GOLDEN.
I Agree
Posted on 02-10-2026 10:14 | By Yadick
I will most likely be voting for you Sam but I will also be expecting to hear a LOT more from you.
As The Sage states, we haven't heard diddly-squat from you. Your predecessor was in Sunlive almost daily and out n about in the community.
The expectation on you is colossal in these turbulent times. Don't rely so heavily on your coffee group - most cannot get to it. We NEED to be hearing more from you or the bottom line is you're gone. Step up, we need you.
Six Deaths Demand Accountability
Posted on 02-10-2026 10:17 | By First Responder
Six people died at the Mount. That is not a paperwork exercise, a bureaucratic hiccup or something that should disappear beneath layers of council spin.
Marty Greenfield is the PCBU at Tauranga City Council. With that responsibility comes accountability. If the evidence shows that serious health-and-safety failures contributed to those six deaths, then the people responsible should face the full force of the law.
WorkSafe should apply exactly the same standard to a council that it would apply to any private company. There must not be one set of rules for ordinary employers and another for those sitting behind council desks.
If the evidence supports six counts of involuntary manslaughter, then those responsible should face those charges in court and let the evidence decide their fate. Six deaths demand accountability—not excuses, buck-passing or bureaucratic self-protection.
Oops
Posted on 02-10-2026 11:38 | By Kancho
",Something is rotten in the state of Denmark "
Sure is and it will always fall on ratepayers to pay all the bills . Reports , meeting , legal expense this list goes in into millions ad nauseum .
Councillors
Posted on 02-10-2026 12:29 | By Kaimai
Withhold all the information you like. However I expect you will be inundated with thousands of Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 requests. If you further deny requests for information the Ombudsman will likely be inundated with requests for information. What ever your excuses are, your credibility is on thin ice.
The Master
Posted on 02-10-2026 14:54 | By Ian Stevenson
As much as it is 100% right that TCC is fully accountable for the public/ratepayers moneys,, decisions etc... you all have to realise that this is TCC. They deem themselves as special, exempt or whatever. You can be assured that if TCC refusing to explain/disclosure then the prime basis of that is "Self-preservation" of TCC and or staff/s members.
Facts of it: - The 5 year contract renewal by Commissioners is a fixed term, it will have a notice period (TCC option if he is required to work it or not, paid anyway) there will be a payout clause, usually that only applies where TCC sacks him. TCC may have twisted and turned so as to then self justify a massive payout? Who knows, as yet.
The public should be fully informed.
@Kancho
Posted on 02-10-2026 15:13 | By morepork
As a lifetime Shakespeare fan, I couldn't let your misquoting go, sorry...
You said: 'As Shakespeare said "Something in the state of Denmark (Tauranga ) stinks" '
Shakespeare said no such thing.
The Line you were reaching for is line 728 of the play, spoken by the guard, Marcellus, to Horatio, as Hamlet walks off accompaned by the ghost of his father.
"Something is rotten in the state of Denmark." (no mention of aroma)
The idea is similar but it is not exactly the same. The comment was prompted by seeing a ghost appear/disappear. Why is this spirit restless?Perhaps we could assign the Bard's line as our opinion on the ghosts of the Commissioners?
Something is certainly rotten in the city of Tauranga.
In a Democracy, you won't always get the government you want; but you always get the government you deserve. (thanks, Alexis de Tocqueville & GBS)
@nerak
Posted on 02-10-2026 15:22 | By morepork
You are completely correct about who employs whom, and, as a ratepayer, I wholly understand your annoyance. But the Administrators should not be looked on as employees; rather as working partners for the community.
(Please...stop laughing...I'm serious.)
Instead, the Mayor acts as though he is a feudal Lord in a fiefdom.
Community priorities are completely ignored in favour of what the Mayor and his cronies want.
Sensible suggestions for important (even essential) items (like a guranteed water supply) are ignored, never even debated, and overridden by political manouevring and vanity projects.
As I mentioned elsewhere today, we get the administration we deserve.
@The Sage
Posted on 02-10-2026 16:10 | By morepork
"The Council would not assist any of the businesses in Adam’s Ave [with] any rates relief, let alone payouts."
I didn't know this, but I remember having the same sad conversation with one of the businesses on Cameron Road that was forced into liquidation.
Wouldn't you think that a Council committed to the welfare of the comunity, would be prepared to take a "rates holiday" on businesses being brought down through actions of said Council, and no fault of their own?
It reflects an attitude.
That attitude comes from not being answerable and/or listening to the people who elected them.
Hands up all those who voted for $75 million on Cameron Road (around 2 KM), with stupid redundant crossing lights, no diagonal crossing, and corssings installed on minor roads that really don't need them and are largely ignored by the public anyway?
And the flowers are sprayed with Roundup...
Getting it wrong
Posted on 02-10-2026 16:26 | By morepork
Marty Grenfell is leaving and we are yet to see exactly WHAT corrective measures (kinetically and administratively) are going to be implemented so there can be reasonable assurance that the repaired facilities will be safe to use. Personally, I don't care whether he gets a contractually guaranteed handshake or not (we have an administration that could teach the world in corporate, arrogant, waste and bad decision making; his payout in that context is what Trump would call: "small potatoes"), and I don't care whether he was pushed or he jumped. I care only about this kind of tragedy NEVER being repeated.
It is OK to get things wrong, IF you accept responsibility, analyse and learn what went wrong, and do everything that can be done to make it right.
If you believe that your position makes you immune, and only the minions have to cop it, then GO!
@First Responder
Posted on 02-10-2026 16:29 | By morepork
Thanks for an excellent post which saved me writing another one ... :-)
I agree with what you said, 100%.
@ Yadick
Posted on 02-10-2026 16:42 | By morepork
You make a good point about the visibility of Sam Uffendell. Like you, I think Sam is a good person and a "Not Bad" MP. I thought he had set up an office downtown, but these days I never go downtown unless I absolutely HAVE to, so I'm not sure if that is still true.
This coming election is going to be critical for Tauranga and our country.
And yet, around 30% of the population won't participate.
I think many people have seriously lost faith in WHOEVER governs them.
"Don't vote; the Government will get in..." (A slogan from the Muldoon era)
I would urge everyone to vote anyway.
Democracy isn't perfect, but it's WAY better than anything else, and we could lose it more easily than many people think.
And voting gives you the right to whinge; not voting means grin and bear it.
@ First Responder
Posted on 02-10-2026 20:32 | By Yadick
You actually raise a very good point.
If the helicopter pilots, who were deemed competent (and certainly were), involved in the White Island tragedy prosecuted, surely Worksafe MUST prosecute Greenfell.
Usual habits....
Posted on 03-10-2026 09:54 | By groutby
..coming from TCC on the Grenfell resignation. We can assume from the silence that they have no intention of even a hint that he received a 'sweetener' to leave, as usual paid by the ratepayer to put us more in debt and not tell the truth.
Surely the real concern is that there are still so many left at TCC in highly rewarded employment happy to cover up and details about any misdemeanours the council have been up to and have done so for years.
Nope, it is 'business as usual' for these supposed public servants and a normal way of conduct.
We need such a huge clean out at TCC and now...but all we may get is an internal review looking after each other to carry on as long as they want. Disgusting...
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.