Full reopening of facilities could cost up to $38m

Damage to the Mount Hot Pools from the Mauao landslide.

Reducing the risk of slips and rockfall enough to fully reopen facilities at the base of Mauao could cost up to $38 million, a risk assessment has found.

Tauranga City councillors will consider the report today as they meet to decide the next steps in the organisation’s response to the Mount Maunganui landslide tragedy.

It follows an independent review finding the council missed opportunities over 27 years to take actions that could have prevented the deaths of six holidaymakers.

The massive slip crashed down from Mauao into the Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park on January 22, after heavy rain.

Seven months on, the council-owned campground and damaged Mount Hot Pools next door remain closed. As does Mauao, which was hit by 45 slips.

Other Adams Ave facilities, including the Pilot Bay boat ramp and Mount Maunganui Lifeguard Service building, are expected to reopen soon.

The council commissioned a Quantitative Landslide Risk Assessment by Tonkin and Taylor after the landslide.

The report said Mauao was an active landslide environment and landslide and rockfall hazards would continue to affect the base around the holiday park and other facilities.

It concluded the landslide was not an isolated event, but part of a long history of slope instability at Mauao, including 220 slips and rockfalls since 1943.

Rescue efforts after the landslide from Mauao.
Rescue efforts after the landslide from Mauao.

The report said engineering solutions alone were unlikely to reduce risk sufficiently to meet the proposed tolerance threshold.

Conceptual scenarios estimated restoring full access and use across the holiday park, hot pools and surrounding facilities could require substantial slope stabilisation works costing between $24m and $38m.

Other scenarios involving partial campground reinstatement and restrictions for the hot pools and boat ramp area carried indicative costs of $14m-$18m.

Scenarios involving removing the campground altogether were estimated at $9m-$13m.

The assessment report said the scenarios were not exhaustive and other options, including greater restrictions or retirement of affected areas, remained possible.

Tonkin and Taylor said the final determination of what level of risk was tolerable remained a decision for the council.

Emergency services searching for people after a slip.
Emergency services searching for people after a slip.

Tomorrow’s meeting will discuss the Quantitative Landslide Risk Assessment, former High Court judge Paul Davison’s review into the tragedy, and recovery progress.

The council has accepted Davison’s recommendations.

Staff reports said the recovery, which had so far cost $5.2 million, was moving from a clean-up phase to considering the land’s future use.

A report on the QLRA, authorised by council recovery manager Charlie Rahiri, recommended councillors adopt a landslide safety benchmark for future decisions about land around Mauao.

Council staff recommended adopting a risk threshold that aligned with the Bay of Plenty Regional Policy Statement, a previous council landslide risk tolerance decision and international geotechnical guidance.

The report recommended adopting a benchmark of a one-in-10,000-year risk of individual death.

This threshold was described in the report as “a balanced and proportionate approach to risk management”. More and less conservative options were not recommended.

The QLRA report said a threshold greater than this was commonly associated with high, significant, intolerable, or unacceptable risk in New Zealand and international guidance.

Emergency recovery efforts at the Mauao landslide site in February. Photo / Jason Dorday
Emergency recovery efforts at the Mauao landslide site in February. Photo / Jason Dorday

The report also said the risk to numerous areas exceeded the benchmark – including at the campground, hot pools, boat ramp and nearby pedestrian area, and the Mauao base track.

These would likely need safety measures.

The campground and hot pools were identified as the highest-risk locations because of their proximity to the slopes, high visitor numbers and the vulnerability of people staying for long periods.

If councillors adopted the benchmark, staff proposed the Mauao Recovery Working Group investigate future land-use options, mitigation measures, stakeholder impacts and costs.

The working group will then develop a preferred option or shortlist of options for council consideration.

The group was proposed to include elected member representatives, technical advisers, recovery office representatives, Mauao Trust – which owns Mauao on behalf of the three iwi of Tauranga – and iwi representatives.

In a public statement issued by the largest of those iwi, Ngāi Te Rangi, on Friday, deputy chief executive Roimata Ah Sam said its priority was learning from the tragedy rather than pinning blame.

The iwi believed Mauao should open only when decisions had been made at an iwi level, and Ngāi Te Rangi would “err on the side of caution”.

“Where uncertainty remains, the safest decision must prevail.”

Ayla Yeoman is a Local Democracy Reporting journalist based in Tauranga. She holds a Bachelor of Arts majoring in communications, politics and international relations from the University of Auckland, and has been a journalist since 2022.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

12 comments

Think About it Mahé

Posted on 01-09-2026 09:19 | By Yadick

How does this figure of $38m compare to the unwanted museum, the waste of time meeting rooms (that will somehow miraculously re-invigorate Tauranga), the Commissioners pay packet, the coffee machine and its associated costs?
I know where I'd rather my money be spent. Think about it Mahé, perhaps over a coffee . . . my shout.


No confidence

Posted on 01-09-2026 11:47 | By Kaimai

"Council staff recommended adopting a risk threshold that aligned with the Bay of Plenty Regional Policy Statement, a previous council landslide risk tolerance decision and international geotechnical guidance."
No, council staff and councilors are a bit late recommending anything. I would not trust any of them to pass judgement on any risk thresholds. I would prefer a vote of no confidence in current Council staff / Councilors, going back to 1999! Who commissioned, and authorised payment for previous reports - Council staff maybe?


If successive…

Posted on 01-09-2026 13:07 | By Shadow1

… councils had taken earlier reports seriously, we wouldn’t be having this conversation now. Needless to say the ball was well and truly dropped by everyone including the Commission.
Now 220 slips in 83 years is a pretty small number, if you consider that many of them have been minor. Most of the ones I recall were caused by the reluctance of council to control water runoff with appropriate culverts.
The worst case scenario of $38M isn’t a logical choice considering the major slope stabilisation required wouldn’t be acceptable to the owners or most of us old Mounties.
No mention has been made of potential insurance claims.
So…shelve the camping ground and hot pools for now and get us back on the tracks. Set up an evacuation system triggered by heavy rain warnings. Consider dewatering the worst wet areas.
Shadow1.


Risk and Accountability

Posted on 01-09-2026 13:20 | By Floyd

The Council is incredibly risk averse. Council managers avoid accountability by hiring consultants to be the intermediaries. If the council staff and or elected members do not thoroughly read the consultants report they then hire legal consultants to mitigate as far as possible the perceived legal risk. Consequently the biggest growth industry related to the council is hiring of consultants.
Ratepayers just pay more!


Ha ha ha

Posted on 01-09-2026 14:33 | By Howbradseesit

Does anyone actually believe it when you read "Tauranga City councillors will consider the report today".
They did not consider reports in the past as we have discovered, why begin now?
No confidence in them - they got to go.


Wasting money

Posted on 01-09-2026 15:03 | By ShaneS

Its a lot of money and when you look at the roundabout work at Bureta, everything is slow and expensive in Tauranga, they just built a roundabout in Whitianga in double quick time and at a reasonable cost. They need to sack their team that is planning all the trees around town as time to save some money but unlike a normal business they won’t and will just keep wasting money on the wrong things thinking it’s making the town better, just get to pools and the mount open and help the poor local businesses in the area


Mount Closure

Posted on 01-09-2026 17:44 | By peter pan

Mabe it would be a good idea to leave it closed and become a nature reserve ,or if reopened do the same as the roads and user pays .


The Master

Posted on 01-09-2026 19:31 | By Ian Stevenson

So $38m, only TCC could create and multiply such crazy numbers....

Better plan, how about planting a few trees to replace the ones deliberately cut down, for no good reason?


.

Posted on 01-09-2026 20:28 | By Tauranga 3116

​$38 million?! You’ve got to be kidding me. Rates are already soaring through the roof, basic infrastructure across the city is falling apart, and now we’re looking at nearly forty million bucks for one spot? Council needs to pull their heads out of the sand and figure out how to cover this through insurance instead of constantly dipping into ratepayers' pockets every single time something goes wrong


@ Tauranga 3116

Posted on 02-09-2026 15:28 | By morepork

It's a "culture" problem.
Why would you take insurance when you have unlimited amounts of OTP (Other People's Money) at your disposal, and you don't even have to answer for spending it?
Need more? Raise the rates.
The council culture is: "We can do whatever we like and our first priority is to ourselves and our vanity projects."
When they replaced the Commissioners, what was the first thing they did?
Sort out better accommodation for themselves and free coffee. And it is very arguable about whether the deal they did was a good one. But it doesn't matter; it's not their money...
Listen to all the boo-hooing because LGNZ (clownshow) was thwarted in its effort to stop Rate capping, and capping will go ahead.
Reason prevailed and the OTP tap is going to be constrained. It will be a few years so better "get in" while you can...


@Yadick

Posted on 02-09-2026 15:37 | By morepork

I completely endorse your assessment.
But I had to smile when you asked the Mayor to "think about it".
Why would any of them break the habit of a lifetime?
Listening to what the community actually would like to see prioritised, is the first step onto the slippery slope for them.
Next thing, the people who live here will expect Council to provide a service...
$38 million is not so bad... it's only OTP.


OPT

Posted on 03-09-2026 12:08 | By morepork

Sorry, my aging brain slipped a cog; it should be OPM.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.