Dog owners face charges after Pāpāmoa attacks

Blue.E and Sasha are accused of attacking people and stock in Pāpāmoa in November and have been impounded.

Tauranga City Council is prosecuting owners of dogs allegedly involved in recent high-profile attacks in Pāpāmoa.

The most recent incident was an attack on a horse on the beach, while the other involved people and cattle being bitten.

Both owners appeared before the council’s Regulatory Hearings Panel on July 20 seeking to have their dogs released from the pound. The panel’s decisions were confirmed this month.

Auckland woman Muriwai Popata-Kaitoa sought the release of her two dogs impounded since they were allegedly involved in an incident on November 14 last year.

A report by Animal Services team leader Oscar Glossop said Popata-Kaitoa’s adult Rottweiler, Sasha, and Staffordshire bull terrier cross, Blue.E, were being held after the incident.

The council alleged she and her then-partner were walking with six off-leash dogs on Parton Rd, Pāpāmoa.

During a physical confrontation with a motorist, the Rottweiler allegedly attacked her owner’s arm and bit the wrist of a person who stopped to help.

Later, the bull terrier cross allegedly entered a paddock on Alice Lane, where it chased and attacked three cattle, injuring one cow’s face.

All dogs were seized and four later returned. Animal Services received an appeal to the retention of the other two dogs on April 10.

Glossop told the panel he did not support the release of the dogs, which he described as having “very scary” temperaments.

He said every time he walked past the bull terrier in the pound, “[he] just about gives me a heart attack”.

The committee decided to keep both dogs at the pound until prosecution.

Popata-Kaitoa is facing three charges under the Dog Control Act for owning a dog that attacked. She is due to appear in Tauranga District Court on December 1.

A conviction could result in mandatory destruction orders for the dogs.

Horse incident

At the hearing, Pearl Jaclyn Li Si challenged the impounding of her two dogs alleged to have been involved in a serious attack on a horse.

Glossop’s report said Li Si owned the 5-year-old Staffordshire bull terriers named Rambo and Oreo.

They were alleged to have attacked a horse and rider while walking off leash on Pāpāmoa Beach on May 5.

The dogs were seized at the scene.

Glossop’s report said Rambo had a history of aggressive behaviour, having attacked a dog and killed a cat in 2022. The dog was classified as menacing, requiring him to be muzzled in public.

Animal Services believed Rambo was not muzzled during the attack.

The horse attacked by dogs on Pāpāmoa Beach in May.
The horse attacked by dogs on Pāpāmoa Beach in May.

Beverley Edwards, a solicitor representing Li Si, told the panel Rambo should have been wearing a muzzle on the day; however, he had not attacked anything in two years.

Edwards argued the dogs should be released to Li Si. She said they would be secured to the property and muzzled and leashed when out for veterinary treatment, meaning there would be “no realistic mechanism by which the release could threaten the safety of any person, stock, domestic pet, or protected wildlife”.

The committee decided to keep both dogs at the pound until prosecution.

Li Si is facing two charges under the Dog Control Act for owning a dog that attacked stock. She is due to appear in Tauranga District Court on August 21.

Anti-barking collar objection

Ōhauiti woman Shontelle Castledine faced the panel to object to a barking abatement notice.

Glossop’s report said she owned two 1-year-old dogs: Karma, a German Shepherd, and Zeus, a Border Collie Staffordshire Bull Terrier cross.

She received an abatement notice from the council on June 5 after numerous barking complaints. The notice stated her dogs had to wear anti-bark collars.

Castledine objected to the notice, saying the use of the anti-bark collar could see a repeat of a “collar freak incident” where Zeus nearly died of asphyxiation.

Shontelle Castledine is required to place anti-bark collars on her dogs Karma and Zeus.
Shontelle Castledine is required to place anti-bark collars on her dogs Karma and Zeus.

The committee received the objection and confirmed the barking abatement notice.

Disqualification objection

Welcome Bay resident Aroha Ririnui appeared before the panel to object to a proposal to disqualify her from owning a dog.

Glossop’s report said Ririnui received the proposal on May 5 after repeated infringements and impoundments.

She owns a boxer-American pitbull terrier cross, Kai, and a bulldog-mastiff cross, Jack. Both were almost 4 years old.

The report said Kai was caught roaming in Welcome Bay in seven separate incidents over 2025 and 2026, and impounded five times last year.

In eight months, five infringement notices were issued for failure to keep the dog under control.

A three-year disqualification was proposed because Ririnui had surpassed three infringement offences within 24 months.

The panel could choose to uphold the proposed disqualification, shorten it or terminate it.

If Ririnui was disqualified, she would have 14 days to rehome her dogs.

She told the panel she accepted she had been irresponsible as a dog owner.

Kai and Jack have been the subject of numerous reports of roaming in Welcome Bay.
Kai and Jack have been the subject of numerous reports of roaming in Welcome Bay.

She had started training the dogs and said they had not roamed since.

Ririnui said she had installed an electronic dog fence containment system and cages to put them in while she was out.

“They’re not violent dogs. They’re always around my mokopuna.”

The committee decided to continue with the disqualification for one year, effective from December 28 last year.

Ayla Yeoman is a Local Democracy Reporting journalist based in Tauranga. She holds a Bachelor of Arts majoring in communications, politics and international relations from the University of Auckland, and has been a journalist since 2022.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

5 comments

Send A Real Message

Posted on 17-08-2026 09:10 | By Thats Nice

These dogs should have been put down - end of so I hope the charges had better equate to the cost, trauma, ongoing stress and also send a damn firm message to these dog owners that have menacing dogs they cannot control are lethal.


Dog attacks

Posted on 17-08-2026 15:48 | By LyricalSoul

There should be no delay, all dogs involved in biting animals & people should be euthanised immediately, & the owners should not be allowed to own any dogs.


The dogs don't lick it off the stones.

Posted on 19-08-2026 02:53 | By morepork

In exactly the same way as children don't either.
Puppies are generally NOT born vicious (and the, thankfully, very few sad exceptions, need to be removed from the gene pool).
The young of most species rely on the adults to learn behaviour.
Domestic puppies learn from their human owners.
If you can't be responsible for the behaviour of your dog, you have abnegated the right to own it. We are far too soft on owners of vicious dogs, and the dogs lose their lives for behaviours that a responsible owner would have made sure were never learned.
All people who decide to own attack species should be required to have compulsory insurance at registration time, that ensures all medical treatment of victims (animal or human) is covered completely, along with a scale of compensation, decided by the Court according to the scale of injury. Owners may face jail.


@ morepork

Posted on 19-08-2026 13:22 | By Yadick

Excellent, absolutely excellent comment. I agree wholeheartedly with you on every point, issue and suggestion you raise here. Top comment.


@Yadick

Posted on 20-08-2026 15:38 | By morepork

As you probably gathered, I feel very strongly about this :-)
Anyway, thanks for the acknowledgement; always welcome.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.