The Eastern Bay’s three district councils have reluctantly agreed to engage in a Head Start Pathway to explore amalgamation with other councils.
This decision has been made unanimously by all elected members, despite some councillors railing against the process as being “undemocratic”.
Ōpōtiki District councillor Barry Howe was the most candid in his objections, describing the options put before council as “blackmail”.
“It gets up my goat when decisions are being made by people other than our community,” he said as Ōpōtiki District Council debated the decision.
“We’re being blackmailed into making an amalgamation decision. If we don’t, [the Government] are just going to make the decision for us. There’s no democratic decision to be made here. We’ve got no option. We’ve been told,” he said.

Ōpōtiki District councillor Barry Howe.
Each council has emphasised that this does not mean that any decision has been made about amalgamation or supporting any particular local government structure; it is only to have a seat at the table while options are developed.
Any options would need to go back to each of the councils for further consideration.
The Government introduced the Head Start pathway in May, allowing councils to restructure themselves into unitary authorities, taking on the responsibilities of both regional and district councils. It is abolishing regional councils.
Outline proposals for one or more unitary authorities for Bay of Plenty and potentially including districts from other regions must be submitted by August 9.
The alternative would be to wait for a compulsory restructure at the end of this council term through a Backstop Pathway, details of which are yet to be determined.
Proposals need to come through two or more district or city councils. They must represent either the majority of councils affected by them or the majority of the population affected by them.
This means smaller councils could be swallowed up into a unitary council that they have not been involved in developing.
Kawerau District Council has had a particularly high level of feedback from its community, with 214 online submissions, 21 emails and 20 hard copy letters.
Of those, 80% wanted the council to oppose any reform but if the reform had to happen, the preferred option was for an Eastern Bay unitary council.
Because of this, the council asked staff to explore only the option to join with Whakatāne and Ōpōtiki to form an Eastern Bay Unitary Council.

Kawerau Mayor Faylene Tunui speaking at the Bay of Plenty mayoral forum in Rotorua. Photo / Mathew Nash
Kawerau Mayor Faylene Tunui said community concerns she had heard were about taking on other councils’ debts and under-investment in key infrastructure in other districts.
“But the big-ticket item I’ve heard is local representation ... We are used to having a council that has eyes and hearts only for Kawerau,” she said.
“What we have tried to be very clear and honest about is that that is not one of the options we are being given.”
Whakatāne Mayor Nándor Tánczos said it was important for Whakatāne District Council to explore options.

Whakatāne Mayor Nándor Tánczos. Photo / Local Democracy Reporting
“If we want to be in a position to be able to submit something, we have to start now,” Tánczos said.
“The big danger with relying on Backstop legislation is that we will end up being part of a Bay of Plenty Unitary Authority and any ability to shape our own destiny as a district will be gone.
He said the timeframe provided by central government had significantly increased the workloads for both the mayors and council staff.
“Government has said really clearly they do not intend to resource it at all.”
Tánczos said there was agreement among Bay of Plenty mayors that the preference was to see Head Start proposals put forward collectively, as a region, even if they may contain sub-regional elements to the proposal.
“I want to acknowledge the great relationships across the Bay of Plenty between mayors and deputy mayors and councillors. All of us are interested in what is the best outcome for our communities.”
Ōpōtiki District Council was the final council to agree to participate in the pathway just last week and work with neighbouring councils to investigate potential options.
Cabinet will make decisions on outline proposals put forward in September or October before the general election.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.




4 comments
This is clearly…
Posted on 09-07-2026 17:36 | By Shadow1
…an ill thought out rort. Nobody has asked for it, councils are given no time to develop plans, no time to consult with ratepayers, just do it!
They seem to want to have it sorted before the election.
This isn’t new to National, or Labour for that matter.
If you recall, Labour sacked Tauranga’s entire council including the Mayor, though they allowed him to resign before it came into effect. That was disastrous for Tauranga.
Amalgamating councils is a major project, it will take years to get it working if it ever will.
Fortunately National has no mandate to force this through. I’m sure they don’t have the support of the coalition partners, let alone other parties. If councils drag the process out, the scheme will die a horrible death. Hopefully the career of the idea’s author will disappear too.
Shadow1.
Council amalgamations
Posted on 09-07-2026 22:25 | By Maxine Woodhall
Mayors collectively should be pushing back on the totally unacceptable timeframe the government have set for this major change.
The Master
Posted on 10-07-2026 14:13 | By Ian Stevenson
As sad as it is, there are more reasons, facts and evidence that smaller is better when it comes to Councils, the bad news is that Government is dictating this, LG's were warned to get back to basics, do it well. Most councils simple stuck their finger in the air and carried on same/worse than before.
Councils are a complete mess, non-democratic disaster on a good day... Any "improvement" for the 24/7 pummeled ratepayers of NZ will be worse as a result of the merging plans. Bigger Councils will make the mess bigger.
The only answer to the Council mess, is 24/7 sunlight on all they do. Open, transparent and accountable.
@Ian Stevenson
Posted on 12-07-2026 14:52 | By morepork
I completely agree with you about administrative transparency. You'd think it would be taken as read, in a democratic administration, but they only make sure that what they are doing is visible when they think the community will approve. The last word of your post is a keyword: "accountable". It doesn't matter how transparent they are if they cannot be held responsible for their actions. They answer to nobody and that makes the Mayoralty a fiefdom. I don't think our elected representatives are terrible people, but I do question why some of them ran for office.
In 1887 Lord Acton famously observed that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely".
Acton originally wrote this to a bishop, cautioning that people—especially religious and political leaders—should never be excused from standard moral judgments simply because they hold office.
I believe Marcus Aurelius expressed similar concerns.
It's been problematic perpetually.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.