“Status quo is not an option … We can drive the bus or be roadkill. This is our opportunity to lead the change.”
That was Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale’s message as councillors debated the city’s options for local government reform this week.
“This is the biggest change to local government since 1989,” Drysdale said.
In May, the Government introduced the head start pathway as part of its Simplifying Local Government programme, which aims to have fewer, bigger councils.
Head start allows councils to voluntarily propose mergers, rather than wait for compulsory reforms – the backstop pathway.
Ministers have encouraged councils to form unitary authorities that have regional and local council functions.
Tuesday’s meeting heard that Tauranga City Council has been in discussions with the councils of Western Bay of Plenty, Rotorua, Kawerau, Whakatāne, Ōpōtiki, Thames-Coromandel and Taupō.
The council agreed to work on a unitary authority proposal outline with some or all Bay of Plenty councils, plus willing adjoining district councils from other regions.
This was recommended by staff to allow the council to work with partner councils to design a system that works for the city’s communities. Making the change before the 2028 elections would also provide certainty for the community.
The staff report said disadvantages of head start included a tight timeframe, no certainty of the proposal being accepted, requiring agreement from at least one partner council, and the fact government policy and direction could change after the upcoming general election.
The report said the “biggest risk” of head start was no suitable councils wanting to partner with Tauranga, leaving the backstop as the city’s only option.
By waiting for the backstop process, the council could avoid the deadline, follow thorough engagement processes with the community, avoid wasted effort if the proposal is not accepted or the risk of not finding a workable partner, and know whether government policy and direction have changed significantly following the general election.
Drysdale said that working with other councils could reduce duplication and improve efficiency.
Pāpāmoa councillor Steve Morris said this was not about adding other districts to Tauranga, but designing a new system for the region together.

Pāpāmoa councillor Steve Morris and Tauriko councillor Marten Rozeboom. Photo / Jo Jones
Tauriko councillor Marten Rozeboom said he was concerned that everyone was still sitting within their current local authority boundaries.
“The ministers made it clear that we can redraw these lines or take the lines away completely.
“Sticking to our boundaries may be restrictive for some communities.”
Public consultation
The council opened initial public consultation on June 15 and this will close on July 1.
This includes a survey on the council’s website gauging support or concerns about mergers, and views on which areas Tauranga could partner with.
The staff report said the survey was estimated to cost about $50,000, funded through existing budgets.
Drysdale also hosted a live chat on Facebook last night on the subject. Viewers asked questions including about how small communities could have their voices heard in a bigger organisation.
The council was provisionally scheduled to decide whether to go ahead with any resulting proposal on July 21.
Head start outline proposals are due August 9.
Cabinet will decide which ones proceed.
The council agreed the head start proposal include results from public engagement and cover matters such as ensuring local voice, finances and proposed boundaries of the proposed new unitary authority.
Cabinet would tell the councils which proposals will continue to be developed in September 2026.
Final proposals will be submitted to the Government in March and the intended timing for final Cabinet decisions is in May.
The backstop pathway will begin after the 2028 local elections for councils that either choose not to take part or that are not part of the accepted proposals.
Ayla Yeoman is a Local Democracy Reporting journalist based in Tauranga. She holds a Bachelor of Arts majoring in communications, politics and international relations from the University of Auckland, and has been a journalist since 2022.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.




4 comments
You are wrong…
Posted on 26-06-2026 10:31 | By Shadow1
…Mahē, the status quo will always be an option.
Willingly leaping into a hastily conceived directive such as the “Headway Path” should not be an option. It can be dressed in any way you like but if there is no debate about it you will definitely be roadkill.
It’s hard to tell whether any or all of the elected councillors think that it’s a good plan, but most will be running against the ridiculous time frame that has been demanded.
If the majority of Councils pushed back, clearly telling the government that this can not be a quick process and will need 12 months of debate, I’m sure they will be successful.
Come on guys, rushing into this could be disastrous. It’s definitely time for a referendum.
Shadow1.
The Master
Posted on 26-06-2026 17:12 | By Ian Stevenson
Obviously, Tauranga will find it extremely difficult to find other council/s that are genuinely wanting to join up. TCC has so much debt, very high rates that will be 2-3x higher by 2034 (but that is the TCC budget, which will be miles understated).
The options and chances for TCC would be 100,000% better to achieve something useful out of all this if the organisation to be made 100% permanently redundant, no exceptions allowed.
Otherwise TCC will be left alone which would be 100% understandable.
Lose your voice
Posted on 28-06-2026 10:38 | By an_alias
The worst outcome for all will be for a dilution and say on how your rates are spent.
TCC and Mahe have already shown they prefer power and not having to listen to anyone's voice even if they pay for all the bills.
This will allow them to continue NOT TO LISTEN.
Its all about gaining more power so it seems. Ask yourself who listens now and would it even get worse when your money is being spent on other areas projects that do NOT benefit you in any way.
When
Posted on 29-06-2026 12:01 | By Kancho
When will we see TCC address their own problems . High repayment cost of over borrowing and further tighten spending . To me the elephant in the room is no apparent restructuring of the entire bureaucratic business . Without getting their own house in order any proposals with others in similar positions seems premature
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.