Tauranga City Council has spent $4.7 million on plans for an aquatic centre that have now been abandoned.
Plans for a new $105m aquatic facility at Tauranga’s Memorial Park were paused by the council last year.
Last week the council decided to redesign the proposed facility to scale it back and change its location within the park.
The aquatic centre with indoor and outdoor pools would now be built on the site of the current Memorial Park pool.
The council approved $50,000 to develop concept designs for the new facility. It did not yet have an estimate for what the full project would cost.
A project steering group, including councillors, would guide the next stage of design.
The revised concept would prioritise functionality and getting value for money. It included indoor and outdoor facilities for lane swimming, aquatic sports, learn-to-swim programmes, hydrotherapy and play.

The Queen Elizabeth Youth Centre will remain open until at least 2041. Photo / Alex Cairns
Council civic development portfolio manager Mike Naude said the concept designs for the new aquatic facility would be completed early next year.
Since the project started in 2021, $4.7m had been spent on design and investigations, up until November last year, he said.
Under the old plan, the Queen Elizabeth Youth Centre was going to be demolished but now it would remain, which indoor sports groups have welcomed.
Volleyball Tauranga manager Jenny Kirk said they were “absolutely rapt” and it was a necessity to keep the Queen Elizabeth Youth Centre courts.
There were 300 teams that played four nights a week across three venues but there were not enough courts available in Tauranga to grow the sport, Kirk said.
In her view, the city needed another multi-use indoor sports facility.
Tauranga City Basketball general manager Mark Rogers said they were “very appreciative” the youth centre would stay but the city was still short six indoor courts.

Tauranga City Basketball general manager Mark Rogers. Photo / John Borren
The shortfall was based on Sport New Zealand guidelines for sport facilities required based on population, he said.
In May the council opened the Haumaru Sport and Recreation Centre in the old Cameron Rd Warehouse building. The centre was intended to replace the youth centre once it closed.
Rogers said Haumaru had enabled them to run competitions for adult members but there was not enough court space to grow the sport further.
“The demand for basketball is still going through the roof.
“There’s definitely opportunities for us to grow the sport within the community, but we just don’t have the space to do it.”
Swimming Bay of Plenty deputy chairwoman Lorien Martin said the change in plans for the aquatic facility was a “responsible and sensible” decision.

The new aquatic facility will be built on the current Memorial Park pool site. Photo / Mark McKeown
The organisation understood the council was focused on delivering a leisure facility that was not designed to meet competition needs.
She fully supported more people being able to access aquatic facilities, and any new facility would help.
It would also relieve pressure on Mount Maunganui’s multi-pool indoor facility BayWave, Martin said.
Swimming Bay of Plenty was keen to be involved in the design, and also still wanted to see Tauranga get an Olympic-length 50m indoor pool to support competitions, training and events.
Plans were under way to extend the 33m outdoor pool at Mount Maunganui College to make it a 50m pool. The council gave in-principle support and a $4.9m grant for the project in May.

Tauranga Mini Golf owner Mike Head. Photo / David Hall
Tauranga Mini Golf owner Mike Head is relieved because the new plans meant his 45-year-old course at Memorial Park would remain.
The previous plan’s footprint would have forced him to rebuild part of the course nearby at his own expense, or close.
Before last week’s decision, there had been five years of uncertainty about whether his business would be affected, he said.
“It’s a piece of history so people are really, really happy that it’s staying here as it is.”
Bay Venues chief executive Chad Hooker said keeping Queen Elizabeth Youth Centre open would help meet the growing demand for court space.
“Despite the addition of new courts, we still have significant unmet demand for indoor court space across the city, particularly at peak times, and we are working with council to plan for the future of the indoor court network.”
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.




16 comments
Hmmm
Posted on 27-09-2025 09:31 | By Let's get real
Our "City partners", who pay huge amounts of money for the privilege, will be recouping their investment from this one.
Even with the ridiculous amounts that our council staff earn, factored into this one instance of stupidity, there must be some hugely significant figures being paid to outside contractors.
IT'S A CITY, NOT A THEME PARK
A loss
Posted on 27-09-2025 10:37 | By Kancho
Pity it cost $4.7 million for no result but if challenging the original project actually saves in the long run it's what we want from council to challenge all spending / projects. I presume this is another hang over from the uncountable commissioners like the rest of unwanted or too expensive projects and under selling assets, leasing arrangements at huge costs. Still would want to see a lot more First whether we really need second whether it's really at the best price . And when is there going to be a sweeping restructuring too to bottom . At this slow rate councillors are not going to survive but have been given a pass on elections until 2028 so keep the focus on reducing costs
Wow…
Posted on 27-09-2025 11:31 | By Shadow1
…what a change of tune. Thank goodness Council is revisiting some of the Commission’s over zealous and extravagant projects. It’s just a pity that we have wasted $4M or so on planning. How did that happen, about a million per year.
It appears that council staff may have been telling porkies when they told us that it was cheaper to build a new Youth Centre than to carry out the urgent seismic enhancements. They are now due in 2041!
It’s also good to know that Council will pause and defer projects when necessary. The Minister for Local Government will be pleased to see that.
Shadow1.
Miffed
Posted on 27-09-2025 11:32 | By PK
When is the council going to be held responsible for this blatant waste of money...again!!
$4.7 million on 'plans' for an aquatic centre that have now been abandoned!!!
Can I please see an itemised account of where this money was spent?
Disappointing
Posted on 27-09-2025 11:58 | By Gigilo
Developing a new concept and producing new plans utilising an existing outdated structure will enviably cost more due to rising costs along with inflation by the time all the the project gets underway. A new building would provide a much more palatable life cycle cost for the ratepayers. But what do I know?
$4.7 million
Posted on 27-09-2025 13:16 | By morepork
With zero result. (OK, I guess the decision to scrap it is an outcome, but it seems an excessively expensive one, to me.)
We can be thankful we had the very best consultants on the job...
Imagine how much they could waste if they actually DID something!
Shame
Posted on 27-09-2025 13:22 | By Jenny K
Shame on the Council staff and Bay Venues for allowing $4.7 million dollars of rate payer money going towards a project which was always going to be too grandiose with the much needed extra court space not even allowed in the plan. Consultation with the users was almost Nil and we lost 4 years again !! Community Sport makes for a great community especially our youth..........
More inepititude
Posted on 27-09-2025 14:03 | By The Sage
The Council don’t worry about wasting a mere $4.7 million. Just keep putting the rates up. The wastage is beyond belief. Time to drain the swamp.
Justify It TCC.
Posted on 27-09-2025 15:20 | By Yadick
. . . $4.7m had been spent on design and investigations . . .
WOW, somebody was running to the bank laughing. That's a huge amount on just plans.
Justify it TCC.
What A Joke
Posted on 28-09-2025 13:58 | By Tonka
I bet i know which councilors would have got the ball rolling on this dreadful waste of money. DISCUSTING !
Cart before the horse again.
Posted on 28-09-2025 18:02 | By phoebe12
Maybe some notice was eventually taken from ratepayer surveys, but wouldn't you think that should have been done before the 'dreamland' concept design stage? And I was under the impression that the current sports facility at Memorial Park was "an earthquake risk " but now it seems that it is ok after all! Words fail me...again!!
Blame
Posted on 29-09-2025 13:47 | By an_alias
It should never have even been started. Was it the un-elected commies that started this or was it the faceless CEO and crew that get away with "JUST INCREASE THE RATES".
Hard to fathom…
Posted on 29-09-2025 16:18 | By Griswald
So if I read this article correctly:
- the old Warehouse on Cameron has been purchased and upgraded to ‘Haumaru’, to provide replacement court space…because QEII & the Memorial Hall were to be demolished. Yet now that we’ve acquired Haumaru and are now retaining QE and hall, we still don’t have enough court space? Hmmm.
- And pools. When Baywave was originally built, there was lament that it didn’t include a 50m pool for competition. And now, with a nine-figure plan to upgrade Memorial pools, still no 50 metre pool…but we’re going to rely on a local school to provide this? Hmmm.
-
Cut out the disease
Posted on 29-09-2025 18:09 | By nerak
that is TCC. Start at the top, work right to the very bottom. So sick of seeing good (our)money being mismanaged, has happened for too many years, slick talking out the back causes us a lot of grief.
I'm with Yadick, justify it, TCC. Like you should have to justify everything you do, to us, your employers. And a large helping of respect for us wouldn't go astray, either. The way I see it, not a one of you have any respect for the hands that feed you.
Still Spending...
Posted on 30-09-2025 08:41 | By Watchdog
This Council may well be upgrading our facilities but us Ratepayers simply cannot afford the increases this causes in our Rates. You are spending faster than we can earn! SO eventually there will be a slump in housing because people who cannot afford the new Rates double figures (which will no doubt be on the menu again this coming year), will have to shift to Kawerau, or Opotiki to be able to breather financially again.
We are not money machines for Council's pleasure. Another huge waste of Ratepayers' money - $4.7 million is akin to a new parking building.
??!
Posted on 01-10-2025 08:44 | By gillbrink
Id like to see where this money disappeared to?
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.