18:56:56 Wednesday 27 August 2025

Tauranga CBD fringe parking fees spark backlash

Paid parking will be extended around Tauranga's city centre. Photo / John Borren

An expansion of paid parking around Tauranga’s city centre amounts to a “tax on living in the CBD”, a resident says.

Liam Jackson will have to pay $10 a day to park outside his Park St home from August 4 after the council decided to expand paid parking to the city centre fringe.

“Over $2000 a year just to park outside my house – that seems crazy.”

On-street parking between the eastern end of Fourth Ave and Park St, north of the CBD, will cost $1 an hour for the first two hours and $2 for every hour after until 5pm, to a maximum of $10 on weekdays.

New two-hour parking limits would also apply to some CBD-fringe streets as far south as Eighth Ave.

The streets are often used by people working in the city who park all day.

Jackson, who works in the city, said his flat has one off-street parking spot that his flatmate needed, so he parked on the street.

He said the parking changes seemed to work against the council’s efforts to revitalise the city centre - which needed people to want to live there to succeed.

“It seems like a tax on living in the CBD, which is counterproductive to what they’re trying to do with revitalising the CBD.”

Residents in Tauranga city fringe streets will have to pay to park outside their homes. Photo / File
Residents in Tauranga city fringe streets will have to pay to park outside their homes. Photo / File

Councillors approved the parking costs and time limits at a Tauranga City Council meeting on July 14, having approved the Tauranga Parking Management Plan in April.

After a split vote, councillors opted not to approve the staff recommendation of resident permits for those living in the city fringe.

The permits would have given residents an exemption from fees.

Staff proposed to allow residents to apply for up to two permits per dwelling with a two-year expiry.

Mayor Mahé Drysdale said two permits for every property was “excessive” and would take out all the parking in the area.

Te Papa ward councillor Rod Taylor. Photo / David Hall
Te Papa ward councillor Rod Taylor. Photo / David Hall

Te Papa ward councillor Rod Taylor said trialling resident permits would be worthwhile and staff could report back on how they were working.

Jackson said he had lived in many cities in the United Kingdom, and all had an option for resident permits.

He said he would be happy to pay for a permit if it was cheaper than on-street parking.

Jackson wanted the council to pause the CBD fringe paid parking until it had sorted out resident permits.

Grace Rd and Neighbourhood Residents’ Association chairman Phil Green said the idea behind the time-limited parking in The Avenues was to prevent CBD workers parking all day, but they would just find somewhere else to go.

He saw people park in the avenues, then use a scooter to get to the city centre so he expected the time limits would just push people further out.

Grace Road and Neighbourhood Residents' Association chairman Phil Green. Photo / George Novak
Grace Road and Neighbourhood Residents' Association chairman Phil Green. Photo / George Novak

Further down around Sixteenth Ave, where Green lived, workers from businesses and the hospital were parking all day and filling up the streets.

“The overflow is not just affecting the CBD and its fringes; there are other issues further out as well.”

The council needed to look at the whole problem of parking and why people weren’t using buses or the CBD parking buildings, Green said.

“It’s got to be addressed as an overall view rather than just looking at each thing in isolation.

“It seems to be a knee-jerk reaction; you fix one and then there’s an ongoing effect and another ongoing effect.”

Council parking strategy manager Reece Wilkinson said the time-restricted parking would be monitored by a license plate recognition car.

If a vehicle remained in a P120 zone for longer than two hours, it may be subject to enforcement, he said.

 

 

Fines for parking over the time limit start at $20, increasing incrementally and are capped at $97.

Taylor said the council understood changes to parking could be challenging, especially when it meant a change of routine or a new cost.

At the council meeting, after the councillors did not approve the resident permits, they asked staff to explore options for a parking zone permit, to ease the impact on affected residents and visitors, he said.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

21 comments

Drysdale not too smart?

Posted on 29-07-2025 07:50 | By jed

"Mayor Mahé Drysdale said two permits for every property was “excessive” and would take out all the parking in the area"

I don't understand this comment. The residents can park as many cars as they like today...but, even then they don't take out all the parking. Clearly.


Feel sorry

Posted on 29-07-2025 09:05 | By Kancho

I feel sorry for people who work in town and for those needing to go there. I do everything I can to avoid going to the CBD.
Buses just time consuming. difficult walking distances etc .
Still I guess the strategy is working to keep people away and traffic less
I see regional council rates hiked up and bus levie are $300 that just don't work for my me. The revenue from busses covers about five percent of their costs


CBD Parking

Posted on 29-07-2025 10:16 | By Oldfella

The council needs to take into consideration the number of construction workers that are currently being employed in the central CBD there are many hundreds and they arrive before 7am in the morning and take all the carparks in the area leaving visitors and other people that work in CBD area to find parking elsewhere . These construction workers need an area to park and free up the carparks for those who need the parking and not push them out into the avenues at another cost. With the new build nearing completion on the Strand the parking will be freed up as the work force will have moved on .
I see this issue daily as I reside in the CBD with the parking problem is driving people away from the downtown with nobody wanting to work or visit it is a disaster .


Crazy

Posted on 29-07-2025 10:30 | By Duegatti

My wife uses a parking building, but at $16 per day, it's cheaper for me to drive her most days .
Hardly a way to reduce congestion, which is minimal, and emmisions.
Public transport is not an option


The Master

Posted on 29-07-2025 12:59 | By Ian Stevenson

This is all part of the 100% desperation of TCC to generate income by any means to funds the grossly over staffed and hugely expensive TCC organisation. The outcome of it, is the complete strangulation of the CBD. The path here is exactly the same for the Mount retail area and the CBD. Once parking costs are applied, then they are relentlessly increased and expanded.

The desperation is that bad.

On top of that the Agenda 2030/2050, seeks to eliminate all privately owned vehicles, making it to expensive to park, own travel and so on enforces that agenda. The desire is to eliminate car parks generally and so les is seen as better. The outcome is obvious, these areas impacted then simply die off slowly and painfully 24/7 as we are seeing, especially in the CBD.


Stupidity

Posted on 29-07-2025 13:27 | By Fernhill22

Again, this is unbelievably short sightedness from TCC. There's a reason why people who work in the CBD park in the roads where they aren't being charged for parking. This is because daily parking fees are an extortionate amount of money that people can't afford to pay in a cost-of-living crisis. These sorts of decisions are driving people out of the CBD, and businesses will suffer as they try to retain employees who can't afford these costs.
In terms of the residents parking permits this should have been a no-brainer to provide these permits to them. Why would you want to live in town & to be charged a premium to park outside your own property. TCC have killed Tauranga CBD with their decisions regarding parking over these past few years. This is another way to fund the Civic precinct but hitting ratepayers in the pocket again.


PARKING FOR WORKERS

Posted on 29-07-2025 14:11 | By glass1/2 full

??? I hope that all of you who voted for M Drysdale are happy now- just 'cause he can row ????? Let's see if he would be happy to drop the council vehicles for a bike??


The Master

Posted on 29-07-2025 14:17 | By Ian Stevenson

Meanwhile the absolute arrogance of TCC staff is to allocate exclusive carparking for themselves, because of a prior self-determined "importance status" that is placed above everyone else... the public who are paying these self-indulgent Muppets.

Proof: -
1 A few years ago, along the Strand area, TCC closed off a parking area for TCC staff and they spent mega thousand installing auto-bollards as well, no expenses spared...
2 When TCC staff were in the long gone ex Westpac building, they absconded with parking meter socks that preserved and held carking for their personal use.

All the above is obviously at TCC ratepayer expense and is obviously unfair, inequitable and especially disingenuous to the public.

What a completely spurious setup that TCC is and remains.


Common sense has left the building

Posted on 29-07-2025 14:53 | By The Sage

The Mayor must want to fund more cocktail parties, coffee machines and Christmas parties. Seriously get a grip on reality.


Good points

Posted on 29-07-2025 15:00 | By morepork

Jed's comment on what the Mayor said mirrors my own. If residents DID occupy all the parking (and they clearly don't), then that would confirm that there isn't enough available parking in town; there is just enough for residents.
Ian's point about the desperation of the current administration is also well taken.
This is not the time to institute paid parking in streets outside the CBD.
It certainly looks like a desperate attempt to raise revenue when they should be looking to really cut waste...
And residents SHOULD get a "deal" just as they do in cities like London and Los Angeles, where they issue resident parking permits.
Commuters who are working in the city SHOULD be eligble for a deal in city parking buildings. Why aren't they?
Expanding this stupid parking policy to the Mount will guarantee the same negative impact we are seeing in Tauranga.


Outrageous

Posted on 29-07-2025 16:08 | By Yuan

Unfair penalty on those residents that live in these streets.

No engagement with residents = poor democracy.
Most councils the world over see fit to provide resident permits.
Unfair to charge or fine us residents that live in these streets.
Modern families need multi vehicles and often only have 1 x garage/driveway parking.

This council did not fairly consider the residents impacted by this, or listen to their own staff!


Revolution

Posted on 29-07-2025 19:45 | By Saul

We need a revolution lol


get real...

Posted on 29-07-2025 21:05 | By OG-2024

what about 13th ave outside boys high?
Students and staff parking everywhere all day despite "no parking behind curb sign age", as well as all the buses that double park at end of school causing congestion and conflict with traffic movements.
instead of expanding the area of paid parking without thought for residents, why not target the real areas of concern around town and actually do some good.
Thought the commissioners waste left with them but we continue to see incredible wastage and poor decisions.


get real...

Posted on 29-07-2025 21:05 | By OG-2024

what about 13th ave outside boys high?
Students and staff parking everywhere all day despite "no parking behind curb sign age", as well as all the buses that double park at end of school causing congestion and conflict with traffic movements.
instead of expanding the area of paid parking without thought for residents, why not target the real areas of concern around town and actually do some good.
Thought the commissioners waste left with them but we continue to see incredible wastage and poor decisions.


get real...

Posted on 29-07-2025 21:05 | By OG-2024

what about 13th ave outside boys high?
Students and staff parking everywhere all day despite "no parking behind curb sign age", as well as all the buses that double park at end of school causing congestion and conflict with traffic movements.
instead of expanding the area of paid parking without thought for residents, why not target the real areas of concern around town and actually do some good.
Thought the commissioners waste left with them but we continue to see incredible wastage and poor decisions.


Whats the Agenda?

Posted on 30-07-2025 09:10 | By Thats Nice

Well, the Council have ruined the inner cbd and now they're spreading out to ruin more. They've also got the Mount in their sights too. This really is disgraceful.


What council haven't done

Posted on 30-07-2025 09:51 | By bigted

Is to force developers to have adequate parking for people that visit or work the buidings.
An example is the courthouse extension. No provision is being made for the many people, public, lawyers, staff, etc that visit. Another is the new council building. Visitors, staff, all have to park somewhere.
This, of course, adds significantly to the cost of construction of buildings, but in the long run would benefit all.


Poor public transport needs fixing first

Posted on 30-07-2025 12:38 | By MountResident72

It still takes way to long to get to Tauranga from places that are close.
Public transport needs to be as convenient - or more convenient than driving to entice people out of their cars. its not enough to offer a stick with no carrot. Some easy ideas:
Rapid buses with minimal stops between the CBD, Mount and Papamoa.
Build park and rides at every papamoa motorway exit (like North shore auckland) then the front part of barfair - and mount end of end of Hewetts road and opp totarat st on hewetts road. With multi story car parks and bike storage secure.
Prioritise bus lanes in riush hour and signalling to get wifi enabled buses on time. buses every 10 mins all day every day. Times need to be like 15 mins from pap to cbd, 10 mins and 5-8 minutes from hewletts road and totara street


Parking

Posted on 30-07-2025 14:04 | By surfsup

As somebody who parks in 4th Avenue and works in the same area the soon to be introduced fees will have an impact on the money I now spend at the local cafe. The workers who park in 4th Ave primarily work in the CBD, the retailers supposedly impacted by all day parking are minimal in this area, residents have ample off street parking so the only reason fees are being introduced is money for the Council with maximum inconvenience for the workers who use these streets.


Useless

Posted on 31-07-2025 11:03 | By an_alias

Just endless attempts to tax and get more money.
Just useless


@That's Nice & Surf's Up

Posted on 31-07-2025 15:43 | By morepork

I agree with both of you. As someone who lives in the affected area, but doesn't have a personal problem with parking (because the people who built my house back in the 80s took parking into consideration, and added an integrated garage to the plan), I completely support the residents.
Residential parking HAS to be implemented, if paid parking is to be. (Otherwise you are penalizing people for living where they already live.)
But there hasn't been enough discussion about whether paid parking SHOULD be implemented. (Has there been ANY, outside of TCC?)
We've seen it destroy a once lively, and buzzing town but no lessons have been learned. Now we'll extend the cancer and destroy the Mount as well.
I shopped with my neighbour at the Crossing this morning; it was a pleasant experience with no worries about parking, and everything you could want, available.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.