Workload worries as Tauranga council slashes jobs

Tauranga City Council is now reviewing its form, function and leadership structure. Photo / Brydie Thompson

Council staff will be expected to “do more with less” after dozens of jobs were cut despite Tauranga’s growing population, a union representative says.

Tauranga City Council has already cut 98 jobs and may cut more with a leadership review now under way.

Slashing the employee budget by $12.3 million had helped reduce the draft rates increase to 9.9%.

The council faced public criticism for proposing a 12% rates increase, down from a projected 20%.

PSA assistant secretary for local government Tom Buckley said they had 250 members at the council who had “significant concerns” about their job security.

“Restructuring leaves our members in a state of uncertainty, and it’s been really unsettling for them.

“Our members in local government are very passionate about their local communities and they’re there for a reason, which is they want to do really good work.”

A number of PSA members were affected by the cuts and the union was supporting them through the process, Buckley said.

Tauranga had grown in 20 years and was expected to have 50,000 more residents by 2050, he said.

“It’s just very difficult to see staff taking the hit for the council knowing what’s coming down the road with the population increases [and] the expectations on services.

“The work will still be there, it’ll just be less people to do that work.”

 PSA union assistant secretary for local government Tom Buckley. Photo / Supplied
PSA union assistant secretary for local government Tom Buckley. Photo / Supplied

The concern for local government employees was the long-term plan to manage growth, Buckley said.

Councils looked after services such as waste, libraries, pools, parks and other infrastructure that were significant in people’s daily lives, he said.

“Whenever there’s a reduction in the people that can do that work, there’s going to be an impact in the future.

“You’re asking people to do more with less, but in the face of not just a stable increased workflow but an increasing one.”

There needed to be appropriate staffing levels to ensure the council could retain its service levels and infrastructure, Buckley said.

As of May 31, the council had 1133 fulltime-equivalent employees. This included some people involved in the restructure who had already left, said chief executive Marty Grenfell.

The initial organisation “reset” proposal began in late March with a focus on disestablishing roles.

Tauranga City Council chief executive Marty Grenfell. Photo / Alex Cairns
Tauranga City Council chief executive Marty Grenfell. Photo / Alex Cairns

After consulting with staff, the decision was made to disestablish 98 roles. That process would be completed by July 1, Grenfell said.

Another proposal was being released to staff this month looking at the form, function and leadership structure of the council, he said.

Meetings with affected staff were continuing this week, and final decisions would be shared by July 18, Grenfell said.

Every council department lost roles as part of the initial reset, he said.

Asked how this would impact the council’s workload, Grenfell said it would not impact regulatory functions or statutory timeframes.

Through the Annual Plan process, the council’s capital programme reduced, so its people resources adjusted accordingly, he said.

“As we are still implementing the changes, it’s too soon to tell how much of an impact these changes will have on overall workload.”

The council was also reviewing its spending on consultants and external contractors, which would reduce as part of the reset, Grenfell said.

“The intention behind both the March and June proposals is to find efficiencies in our operations, while mitigating any significant impact on service delivery to the community.”

Grenfell said he understood people’s concerns about job security.

“Change of this nature and uncertainty is unsettling and it is our intention to work through the process in a timely manner.

“The continued growth of the city and future workload is something we are conscious of, as is legislative change and reform, including Local Water Done Well and changes to our regulatory functions.”

According to the council’s 2023/24 Annual Report, it spent about $99m on personnel salaries and wages, up about $16.7m on the prior year.

It spent about $43m on consultants and project-related consultant services, up by about $2.6m.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

15 comments

Hope

Posted on 18-06-2025 07:34 | By FRANKS

that's just a start..............how many were vacant positions anyway?


More Savings Possible

Posted on 18-06-2025 08:34 | By Alfa male

Perhaps they won’t need that fancy coffee machine now that there aren’t so many of them.


and that.....

Posted on 18-06-2025 09:12 | By groutby

@FRANKS is a question I and many others continue to ask....it doesn't seem that we will get that answer....to create roles to simply disestablish them before appointments are made is creating more 'smoke in mirrors'....


job cuts

Posted on 18-06-2025 10:19 | By Ajs

maybe if they weren't blowing 300 plus million on museums and nice to have stuff! there would be enough money to go around to pay for all the necessities.


Extra Workload

Posted on 18-06-2025 10:37 | By Yadick

A lot of those redundant rolls were vacant so really your bleeding is in vain. As far as an extra workload - yes. You may need to pick up an increased workload. A friend of ours worked at the hospital in an admin roll and their department went from 26 pers to 3 pers with an ever increasing workload. Three people had to pick up the roll of 23 others.
Yes Council staff, you will need to work harder. The days of cruising through your day are obviously coming to an end. Welcome to reality - It's happening everywhere.


Reality

Posted on 18-06-2025 11:51 | By Duegatti

98 roles disestablished doesn't mean 98 people out of a job.
Also, a growing population doesn't automatically require more council staff in proportion.
But, I would also rather see fewer councillors pet projects funded than people sacked.


Its not rocket science

Posted on 18-06-2025 12:43 | By Don Twori

Instead of trying to rate people off their land with 12% increases every year, the permanent staff need to fit council expenditure to the cost of living, starting with the basics before adding nice -to-haves like art galleries and museums, not to mention shiny new council staff buildings every few years. Council itself needs to adopt that guiding principle.


Just think

Posted on 18-06-2025 12:43 | By Kancho

If council had stayed with core business and not rejected the referendum or scaled back would we still need to do this . Mind you all business like organizations do look at efficiencies and staff requirements .
In my mind it's down to Auntie Mahuta from Labour sending in commissioners who spent up large and put in place the extravagant contracts instead of scaling back and concentrating on what was needed not what we got. They took the money and left with a smirk. Can't help feeling sorry for staff as it's not their fault . I thought Auntie Mahuta Labour was more worker friendly but seems not as this situation is also at the behest


The Master

Posted on 18-06-2025 13:00 | By Ian Stevenson

I tis not just the grossly overstaff TCC that is an issue, it is the massive wage payments, related costs, losses and more than all these people running around in circles create.

Previous independent data and reviews has illustrated that the overall staff numbers are well above that reported officially by TCC, certainly when you include all the temps. contractors and fudged numbers related to CCO's and other appendages, the full and total staff numbers and costs is absolutely massive.

Then add in, that especially the middle management is utterly bloated, reports indictae3-4x more staff numbers that a well organised and efficiently run organisation/LG Council should have. To many running around looking for something to do, they end up just being a menace to all others/public.

End result, staff number are approx. 35-40% to high and wages are on average 15-35% overpaid.


Show us the numbers

Posted on 18-06-2025 13:22 | By Jules L

The union rep tries to tell us that all of the staff are needed to run essential services, but we already know that is not the case, they are doing an abysmal job of looking after our essential infrastructure. How many of them are engaged instead in the irrelevant fluff that nobody ever asked them to do in the first place, the personal glory projects and virtue-signaling nonsense? We don't have the answer to that question because the council organisation is totally opaque, we don't have any breakdown in what staff are engaged in what work. It's about time that the council became transparent and told us how many people we pay to do what work.


Redundancies

Posted on 18-06-2025 13:54 | By The Sage

So how much are the payouts, to all those losing their jobs, going to cost? This is just the tip of the iceberg. Welcome to the real world.


@Don Twori

Posted on 18-06-2025 14:43 | By morepork

Don Twori, be happy... You are 100% correct.
It isn't just about staff numbers at TCC, it is about attitude and culture.
“Restructuring leaves our members in a state of uncertainty, and it’s been really unsettling for them."
I wonder if they know (or care) how unsettling it is for us to have to face an ever-increasing Rates bill? (Not playing the sympathy card here, many are worse off... but those of us trying to live on a fixed income while EVERYTHING increases beyond the level of inflation, can also be pretty "unsettled"...)
I would have thought that being unsettled by forced layoffs, might lead to making sure you are doing the very best job you are capable of, so as to avoid the axe.
There would be no need to lay anyone off, or to increase rates, if projects were limited to essential and affordable only.


As The Sage comments,

Posted on 18-06-2025 18:30 | By nerak

Welcome to the real world. Some of those now jobless might find it very hard to get work in the real world, where they will have to WORK for their pay. It will be a novel idea for some.
Still a lot of trimming to be done.
I'm still waiting on the truth, how many staff are/will be jobless? This is the ratepayers business, we are footing the bill in every aspect of it. We have a right to know the truth.


@nerak

Posted on 19-06-2025 15:46 | By morepork

You are absolutely correct that, as the people who are paying for it, we have a right to know how our money is being wast... oops! spent. Your question regarding how many will be jobless is a very fair one.
But Power doesn't care about fairness or transparency (except at election time) and questions that have uncomfortable or embarrassing answers go straight to the bottom of the heap. When they can no longer be deflected or hushed, they are answered with equivocation and spin.
It is a simple question; why has there been NO straight answer?


Indeed.....

Posted on 20-06-2025 13:55 | By groutby

@nerak, morepork and others....a statement issued by TCC would suffice at this stage to state simply perhaps the following, ...how many, when and the savings....
This would also confirm for current (as in actual staff and not projected jobs) staff the intention and maybe at the moment there could be a belief that 'jobs forever' in the council is still alive and well, but there really does need to be some movement ....so....as ratepayers work their way towards rates capping ( a very real possibility) we await said statement of intention...soon....


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.