Differing opinions on boot camp proposal

Critics say they won't work to prevent re-offending. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone.

The government's own advisers says the tougher its new boot camps are, the worse they will work.

A trial of the Young Offender Military Academies was due to begin by the middle of the year, run at one of Oranga Tamariki's youth justice facilities.

Critics say they won't work to prevent re-offending, and both the Human Rights Commission and the Chief Children's Commissioner says they'd had no input, but did have major concerns.

And advice to Children's Minister Karen Chhour released under the Official Information Act showed officials also raised concerns.

"Traditional boot camp models of strict discipline are likely to be detrimental to young people with a history of abuse and family violence," says advice from prior to the announcement they were going ahead.

"Some boot camp approaches have an initial 'breaking down' phase that tends to be confrontational, which poses greater risk to those with such histories," says the advice which has now been released under the Official Information Act.

Softer was better, officials tell the Minister.

"As more serious offenders in the New Zealand youth justice system are likely to have experienced at least two 'traumatic events', therapeutic components, trauma-informed approaches, and increased support during the initial phase of any proposed programme, are recommended."

The advisors emphasised not all boot camps were the same and the military approach and "scared straight" type were among those that did not work.

"International evidence has shown that 'boot camps', in and of themselves, are one of the least effective interventions when it comes to reducing offending and antisocial behaviour," says the main briefing to Karen.

"Boot camps with a primary focus on rehabilitation, were significantly more effective than other types of boot camp... therefore, it seems likely that a military regime itself is not effective in reducing recidivism."

Badly designed, they could erode human rights such as freedom of movement or of association or of freedom of expression, the advice says.

The OIA boot camp papers were heavily blanked out, on the grounds of keeping advice to Ministers confidential, making it impossible to know what officials fully argued or ultimately recommended.

Minister 'disagrees' with advice

Karen Chhour rejected the advice the boot camps could be detrimental. "It's advice, I can disagree with advice," she tells RNZ.

She says she'd spoken to many people who had been through Blue Light and military-style programmes and was consulting with iwi.

"So everybody has opinions. And what I'm saying is we can't afford to not do anything, because what's more detrimental for these young people is to have them going into these youth justice facilities without any rehabilitation, coming out and ending up in adult prison because we haven't given them the care that they need."

Children's Minister Karen Chhour. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver.

The government was walking a difficult line between needing to look tough, and playing up the rehabilitation side.

Karen says she was focused on the "difference" this time - after previous failed attempts at boot camps - and that would mean lots of follow-up support when young people get out.

She confirmed the camps, aimed at the worst young criminals who numbered about 400 in 2022, were part of the Prime Minister's new target to cut serious youth offending by 15 per cent.

Karen says Oranga Tamariki staff were being trained and the youth justice residencies, which have come under heavy criticism previously, could "be the right place for the full-fledged thing. Once the law changes, then we can consider what to do from there".

"I have every faith that Oranga Tamariki knows exactly what I expect of them. We have set down priorities. We have set down what we want to see happen."

Defence and Police would be the other main government agencies involved and were "enthusiastic", Karen says.

Neither would comment to on whether the boot camps would drain their already tight resources.

A January briefing says "there will be a particular impact on the NZDF if its personnel are to be involved".

Human Rights and Children's Commissioner concerns

The Human Rights Commission says it "has serious concerns about the way in which key human rights and te Tiriti o Waitangi issues raised by officials appear to have been disregarded by the Minister".

The Royal Commission looking at abuse had shown "these types of punitive institutions have had a propensity to cause harm for children and young people," the HRC says.

And they were contrary to recommendations from the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and Committee Against Torture, which last year encouraged the government to address youth justice issues through non-custodial measures.

Chief Children's Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad expected to meet Oranga Tamariki this coming week to find out more.

"The Minister for Children has says the approach will involve rehabilitative, trauma informed care.

"I agree these are crucial components for any youth justice response, alongside a number of other considerations from a rights perspective.

"I remain ready to provide independent advice to government."

- Phil Pennington, RNZ

4 comments

Hmmm

Posted on 11-04-2024 21:21 | By Let's get real

Pretty sure that ram-raiders and armed robbery suspects will really enjoy a bedtime story with their cocoa before they are tucked in at night.
Don't forget to clean their shoes before sending them off to school with their packed lunch.


A bad title.

Posted on 12-04-2024 13:12 | By morepork

"Military Camps" is a bad name for these camps. It degrades the Military, who do not see "discipline" as legal thuggery. Putting boundaries on rebellious young people and enforcing those boundaries (until they learn to enforce them themselves) is a positive process, and it may draw on Military experience, but the purpose of the Army is not to reform young tearaways.
These camps should be showing inmates that there are alternatives which have better outcomes for them and the society they live in. The goal should not be about a tough reputation and fearsome retribution. It should be about learning self-discipline and trust and working together to achieve worthwhile goals. (The Army does all of this...) Individuals should leave these camps with increased self-esteem and better awareness. They should also be better equipped to meet the challenges of bad environments when they return to society. Follow-up IS very important.


cost...

Posted on 12-04-2024 14:23 | By This Guy

They keep neglecting to mention that these camps cost 400k per offender... and also ignoring the evidence that the camps do not work (in Aus the cops say, it made things worse) but hey why listen to the experts/evidence when you can pay your mates $4000 a day to be your "consultant" to tell you want to hear...


Alternative treatment

Posted on 12-04-2024 22:12 | By CliftonGuy

Maybe the "toughen up" treatment should be changed to the opposite?
Dress the offenders in pink overalls, deny them all TV and mobiles. Feed them on the basic, nutritious food, but it is all put through a blender, just like baby food. Make sure they read at least one classic book every week.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.