Mum: Ex ‘hiding income to avoid child support’

Janet feels that her children are getting a raw deal from their self-employed father.

Full-time single mum-of-three Janet says she is left struggling to get by because one of her children’s fathers is able to conceal how much he is earning.

Her teenage sons’ father was helped into a business by his parents, she says, which appears to be growing.

Her younger child’s father is on a benefit.

“My teenage sons’ dad brags about his jobs on his business page on Facebook, my sons have never got any birthday or Christmas presents from their dad for 14 years.”

She says he has reduced his declared earnings from the business each year.

“He is obviously earning a lot more and doing cash jobs and hiding his income... With his child support decreasing by an extreme amount, I won’t be able to make ends meet. I know he is earning more than $100,000 annually.”

She says he was meant to pay just over $1100 a month between January and April but had only paid $473 in February.

From May his support will drop to $623 a month.

Her oldest son needs braces, which will cost $9000. Her middle child has an intellectual disability and toileting issues.

“I am on my feet constantly all day every day, I am up around six every morning and don’t get to bed until between midnight and 1am every day, I am unable to work as I also have a disability my legs are swollen and I’m still recovering from recent hernia surgery.

“My sons are being sponsored through Variety charity as I can’t even meet my sons’ clothing needs. I live on a financially tight budget, with the rising cost of living, it’s gets harder to make ends meet.”

Data obtained from Inland Revenue under the Official Information Act shows that taxpayers who are listed as self-employed, and who are liable for child support, general declare lower incomes than self-employed taxpayers overall.

Child support liability is decided according to a person’s income, the amount of time they have the children in their care and their other children.

Overall, nine per cent of all self-employed taxpayers were declaring income of $30,000 to $40,000 a year, compared to 12 per cent of liable parents.

At the other end of the spectrum, 11 per cent of all self-employed were earning $100,000 to $150,000 but only eight per cent of those liable for child support.

Across all taxpayers, seven per cent of self-employed were earning $150,000 to $200,000 a year but only four per cent of liable taxpayers.

Across all self-employed people, 58 per cent were earning less than $70,000 compared to 70 per cent of those liable for child support and 72 per cent of all taxpayers, including those in all forms of employment.

Jessica Berentson-Shaw, from think tank The Workshop, says it's a recognised problem.

“It’s like a lot of these policies we need to update our systems to look at wealth - debt and assets. We know that income is simply not a sufficient measure of someone’s financial stability and ability to support their children and themselves.

“The world has changed and unearned income is increasingly a feature of well-off people’s lives. I also tend to think with children unconditional publicly funded child support still answers a lot of these problems including poverty.”

Robyn Walker, tax partner at Deloitte, says further investigation of the data is needed.

“You could definitely say there is evidence of lower incomes across the board with the liable parents cohort, when you’re looking at percentage of them,” she says.

“But is that actually evidence of any manipulation, or is it potentially more evidence that if you’re in a child support situation maybe you’re earning less because you’re potentially working less, juggling childcare responsibilities?”

You may also like....

2 comments

This is nothing new..........

Posted on 11-03-2024 09:04 | By groutby

.....and interesting to see it is republished from a Stuff article...all too frequently accusations flow from one side to the other as former ( one would hope) loving couples are at war with each other for various reasons. All very sad and unsettling for the future of those right in the middle of the hatred....the children themselves...
There are many cases raised claiming fathers do not pay the full financial contribution and many would be true, but I imagine the IRD and Social Welfare departments are doing their best to minimise the avoidance.
However, there are some situations whereby it would seem that those left (literally) holding the baby and the ultimate responsibility for the lives of the offspring have continually made poor 'life choices', and even more sadly made a choice to rely on welfare sometimes as a result of poor partner selection.


@groutby

Posted on 11-03-2024 12:13 | By morepork

I endorse your final sentence 100%. While I have sympathy for single parents struggling to provide for their kids, the children didn't materialize out of the cosmos by themselves. Far too many underestimate the ongoing responsibility of parenthood (or never even consider it) and decide to let the community carry the results of their self indulgence. No-one approves of a father shirking responsibility for his offspring, but it takes two to tango, and if your partner is obviously not good parent material, then why are you imposing such responsibility on them? We live in an age where parenthood is a choice, and there are couples who desperately want children and can't seem to have them. Meanwhile, others, who are patently unready or unsuitable candidates, go ahead and breed because they know that society cannot discard their children. Parenthood should never be regretted; think before you act.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.