The Government will fix the Water Services Entities Bill this week by removing the entrenchment clause that was voted on during committee stages, Leader of the House Chris Hipkins announced today.
'It was a mistake to put the entrenchment clause in and the Government will fix the issue as soon as the House resumes on Tuesday,” says Hipkins.
'We will do this by sending the Water Services Entities Bill back to the Committee of the Whole to remove the entrenchment provision.
Hipkins says the Bill has just finished committee stages, "so we can easily send it back and fix the issue before the final reading".
'The intention to protect assets from being sold was right, but entrenchment usually requires a super majority or seventy five percent of the parliament to vote for it," says Hipkins.
'The approach in this amendment allowed an entrenchment provision to pass in a way that is not typical for parliament. That has wider ramifications that we are not comfortable with. That's why we will fix the issue."
Hipkins says it's also important Parliament strengthens the rules around entrenchment generally to avoid this in the future.
'As such we will refer the wider matter to the Standing Orders Committee, where all parties are represented, in order to strengthen the protections for entrenchment provisions,' says Hipkins.
'We will ask the Committee to look at where entrenchment provisions are appropriate and what majority should be required for them.
'It is important to note the entrenchment clause only applied to maintaining public ownership of water assets. In order to protect against privatisation of these assets we will also be seeking political assurances from the National and ACT parties via letters that ask them to commit to public ownership.
'We hope they commit to keeping water assets in public ownership, especially given their previous track record of selling public assets,” says Hipkins.



5 comments
Now
Posted on 04-12-2022 09:44 | By Kancho
They need to scrap the three waters altogether. Water isn't to be controlled or owned by any group by unaccountable appointmented minority. Infrastructure funding is both a government and council concern but added layers of bureaucracy and talk adds only more cost. This is ideology that usurps democratic process
next step:flushed
Posted on 04-12-2022 10:14 | By Hugh Janis
The left knows too well what the right hand is doing and to plead ignorance is devious. It is pleasing to see a democracy in action, bringing down a would-be dictator.
Oops!
Posted on 04-12-2022 11:21 | By morepork
Given they have had over 80,000 messages against the entrenchment, they might have decided it was "too risky" and a bridge too far, given the fact that people are waking up to seeing their Democracy being replaced. Expecting to get an assurance from some future Government that they won't sell the water is a big ask; Governments do whatever they decide is politically useful and nobody is going to cut off their options before they need to. The main thing is that any Council deciding to sell the water (for whatever reasons) should need to get approval from the community before they can do so.
Wake up
Posted on 04-12-2022 12:10 | By Slim Shady
They are scrambling now. Good that it has gone but people should be worried that they tried it on in the first place. We have seen how they have dismantled democracy, and I have no doubt that they would try such a thing in future if they get back in. We are not China. We are not a one party state. Yet. Even Labour supporters need to think long and hard about whether they want to live under such a system.
I'm with Kancho on this.
Posted on 06-12-2022 12:49 | By morepork
An excellent, succinct statement. Sadly, little chance of seeing it implemented.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.