Govt‘s new public transport plan

File Image.

The government is announcing a new approach to public transport in New Zealand.

The approach will include support for 'on-demand' public transport services, allowing councils to own and operate services in house, improving pay and work conditions, aiming to deliver routes and services that reflect community needs and producing incentives to decarbonise the fleet.

Workers and public transport users are at the heart of the new Sustainable Public Transport Framework, says Transport Minister Michael Wood.

"We are rolling out a new public transport model, that will prioritise fair and equitable treatment of employees, mode-shift and improved environment and health outcomes,” says Wood.

"For too long, the public transport model has encouraged operators to squeeze worker conditions, pay and opportunities, preventing public transport from living up to its full potential.

"The current model that was meant to lead to better public transport is causing operators to wind back services and timetables, because they can't get drivers."

Wood says public transport is too important to the environmental, social and economic goals to allow this to continue.

"The new Sustainable Public Transport Framework will help to create a public transport system that is reliable, an attractive career opportunity and a credible alternative to using cars to get around.

"Improving the conditions of employees will make it easier to recruit and retain the workforce, allowing frequent and reliable services. This will also provide job security by allowing drivers the opportunity to maintain employment if there is a change in operator.

"The new model will also give local authorities more flexibility and control over how public transport is planned and delivered, so they can have a solution that works for their communities."

Public transport authorities will have the option to own assets and operate services, if they feel that's a better solution for their community than outsourcing to an outside provider.

Wood says this will make it easier to plan networks and services, to set fairs and policies, and encourage innovation in how services are delivered.

"Our Government recognises that public transport is a lifeline that connects people to work, to school, to recreation and to their friends and family. These changes will mean that we have an effective, reliable and sustainable public transport system well into the future."

Increased centralisation would lead to fewer buses - ACT

"Minister of Transport Michael Wood's policy of trying to take public transport accountability away from private companies is a sop to union bosses that could lead to fewer buses on the road," says ACT's Transport spokesperson Simon Court.

"If councils accept these changes it means they would have to act as both the purchaser and the provider, and that they'll be in charge of managing capital."

Court says taking responsibility away from private providers won't create more bus drivers and train conductors, it will stretch councils' limited capital further and lessen accountability on the provider.

He says the result of this will be less buses on the road.

"Public transport services are being hammered by staff shortages that are reducing services, but this is symptomatic of a wider problem within the New Zealand economy and centralising the services won't make any difference.

"Instead of going straight for centralisation, the Minister should be looking at practical ways to tackle the labour shortage and increase resourcing.

"As released in our cost of living document, ACT says we need to do this by dumping the labour market test, industry specific wage requirements, and transfer restrictions. Foreign workers should be able to work for accredited employers so long as they are employed consistent with New Zealand law."

You may also like....

9 comments

Hmmm

Posted on 15-08-2022 21:00 | By Let's get real

The stupidity of the public transport sector in NZ is that the show-ponies in Wellington stubbornly believe that what MIGHT work in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, will also work in all other parts of the country irrespective of population and geography. Still, let's through even more money at a problem, because that always works.


Can’t get drivers

Posted on 15-08-2022 21:51 | By Johnney

Don’t these politicians read the news. We can’t get drivers because of law and order issues, or lawlessness and disorder issues. Who would want to drive a bus to be abused, taunted, threatened and provoked. This is where a major problem lies. So now the ratepayer will have to buy the assets of private enterprise while the ratepayers are forced to sell their water assets. Where do they dream up these ideas from.


Yet another debacle

Posted on 16-08-2022 09:04 | By PJ-Bethlehem

Ok, now ...where is the ministers comment as to the fit for purpose bus size... EVER day I see 40 seater buses with 5 to 10 max passengers aboard. Bus size and frequency of service has a MAJOR impact on the outcomes.


Vision.

Posted on 16-08-2022 13:06 | By morepork

Other posters have made valid points about why you can't get drivers, and the fact that we run huge buses on streets never designed to take them and they operate mostly empty. The whole of public road transport needs review and possibly, resetting from the ground up. It requires vision, imagination, and a look at what some countries have done. (Hong Kong would be a good model for Tauranga). The increasing impact of technology should also be factored in. Buses can be in contact with a control hub and loading could be monitored and levelled. Drivers can work on call and more buses can be deployed as required. The actual buses should be smaller, and the control of them should be smarter. People should be able to hail a bus and request getting off (I saw this working with minibuses in North London...) Start from scratch... with vision.


As Gretta says Blah blah blah

Posted on 16-08-2022 17:57 | By Kancho

So much talk for this government so little delivery. Think they take on so much talk so much they lose creditability. Concentrate efforts and prioritize seems to be not in there vocabulary.


Waffle

Posted on 16-08-2022 19:05 | By Slim Shady

Another “strategy” that is just waffle. Not sure what “on demand” service means. Is that a taxi? I’ve said for months that those big empty yellow things were a waste and they’d be better off taxiing the lone passengers. I was joking, but maybe this is what Labour have in mind? Subsidised taxis. Hahaha


Morepork vision

Posted on 20-08-2022 12:01 | By Kancho

Hong Kong has a much more dense population and less car ownership. Yes they have smaller buses but still traffic problems. Mostly they have a very efficient underground rail system with trains minutes apart. Hong Kong has a totalitarian government who dictates everything. Still we have non democratic government commissioners calling all the shots so even after consultation they continue with largely their restrict cars policies


@Kancho

Posted on 20-08-2022 14:11 | By morepork

I think my point was that there are emerging technologies that could (should?) be factored in to a complete re-appraisal of Bus services. I see Hong Kong just as some possible ideas, that could work well in Tauranga (the most important being smaller buses...). I believe we need to re-assess the whole way in which we will use Bus transport. And that requires vision... Unless we have a viable, cost-effective, Bus service, we won't get people out of their cars and it is stupid to pretend that we will.


empty buses in Tauranga

Posted on 23-08-2022 15:30 | By Bill S

On Cameron road the average passenger loading on the yellow buses would be less than 3. It is my opinion the number of customers required to fill these buses do not exist. When the teeenagers get their licenses, buy a car, forget the bus until you are old, and have no license ,then the bus is the best option ,free with a gold card.The bus policy will never work here!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.