National MP Sam Uffindell says he's not the same person he was '20 odd years ago' after his involvement as a teenager in an assault on a younger student came to light.
"I was a bully at school and I'm not proud of it," he says in a stand-up this afternoon.
On Monday it was revealed that Uffindell was kicked out of his boarding school as a 16 year old for beating a younger student.
He says he punched a 13-year-old boy in the arm and body "multiple times" when he was a student at King's College.
Uffindell says he was expelled at the end of his fifth form year, and was asked to leave the school the day after hitting the other boy.
It was a significant moment in his life that had a strong impact on him, he says.
He looks back and says he doesn't really like the person that he was at that time.
He apologises to any who have been hurt by him. He says he has grown a lot as an adult and reached out to the victim to apologise.
"I'm a long way from that person that I was 20 odd years ago."
He says the last 24 hours have been awful - upsetting for himself and his family - "but you know what, they're self-inflicted".
He says he takes ownership of it, has reflected on the incident over the years and wanted to atone for it when he returned to New Zealand.
"It had a significant impact on my life ... part of being a mature adult I'm able to empathise now."
He says it was a genuine apology.
He does not feel let down by the National Party, that they ultimately saw he was remorseful.
Having made a speech on law and order and violence as his maiden speech at Parliament, he says it isn't a great look and doesn't help the cause.
"I've said to my wife and my parents - my mum especially - I don't like that person that I was back then."
He says the school acted appropriately in asking him to leave.
Asked why he didn't come forward during the by-election for Tauranga, he says in hindsight he should have come forward about it.
He says he doesn't recall whether there was a discussion with the party about whether the incident should have been disclosed during the campaign.
"Look, I was a 16 year old, and I made a big mistake, you know. I've got young children and one day they will be at school and if stuff like this happens I will be very upset."
He acknowledges the assault was unlawful.
He had a conversation with the preselection committee about the incident, he says, and then-Party President Peter Goodfellow would have been aware of it.
Asked if he feels he came to Parliament dishonestly, he says he gave a full written and verbal statement to the party.
The voters should "potentially" have been informed about it, but says he is a significantly different person than he was when he was 16.
"In hindsight, we would have been better to get that out earlier."
He says he's sure he has in the past hurt people both physically and mentally and was a bully when he was at high school.
"It makes me reflect a lot on what school was like and who I am as a person ... and the example I want to be setting to people."
This was by far the worst incident he was involved in at school, he says.
Other incidents may include tackling or hitting some people, and name calling.
"I was still a teenager who wasn't a great person but I was learning my lessons... I don't blame Kings at all, it's for me to own."
"I think anyone can change, I think people can change... I think I just matured and developed empathy, which I didn't really have as a teenager."
He says the revelations have been damaging to him personally and to the party, but he wants to use his position to do good.
"I continue to be sorry, and that apology I made last year was genuine ... it was deeply genuine and it remains genuine."
Earlier this morning, Uffindell told RNZ there was "rough and tumble" when at the boarding school but the attack on a student was the most serious incident he was involved in "by a long way".
Uffindell apologised to the victim last year, nine months before he announced his candidacy in the Tauranga by-election, but says in his interview on Morning Report there was no link with wanting to launch his political career.
'He has my backing and he has my support' - Luxon
Meanwhile, National Party leader Christopher Luxon is standing by the MP for Tauranga, but says the assault of a smaller boy at boarding school should have been made public.
Fronting the media at Parliament this morning, Luxon says he had been unaware of Uffindell's assault on the boy until yesterday.
"He has my backing and he has my support but clearly he needs to be able to build back trust with the voters in Tauranga, and make sure that he is ... demonstrating as we go into the next election - that he's a person of good character."
He says Uffindell had declared the details of the incident when he sought the candidacy, and there had been a thorough process including seeking comment from third-party references, but a few of things should have happened that did not.
"The assessment was 'hey listen, no, Sam is a changed individual from the 16-year-old we saw 22 years ago ... so that I think did work well, because at least the discussion was had, there was deep exploration of the issue.
"The thing that could have been different, frankly, is that I should have been informed rather than finding out yesterday, the second thing is the delegates ultimately should have been informed.
"Most importantly I think the voters in Tauranga should have been informed so they can form their own judgement and should have had that information in the campaign."
He says Uffindell was genuinely remorseful and regretful and had fronted up on the matter.
"He's fronting and he's owning that. And I expect him to do that."
"There is no place for violence in New Zealand - no setting, no context, no excuses - and we abhor it and we don't condone it whatsoever."
The selection process for candidates includes an initial screening with reference checking, then a selection panel, says Luxon.
"All those people were fully aware as they weigh up a series of candidates and they can choose to let them go through or not go through and there was deep exploration of this issue with Sam."
After that, the selection goes to 60 delegates who are party members, who each candidate spends time with.



10 comments
For Goodness Sake
Posted on 09-08-2022 11:58 | By Yadick
What a ridiculous storm in the tea cups saucer. Move on.
Yes You Were
Posted on 09-08-2022 12:06 | By Yadick
And so was I. Quit adding fuel to the media and Labour's witch hunt by being a bully to yourself. It's out there, personally it makes absolutely no difference to me, you still have my vote and support so move on and do the job we voted you for.
Karma is a B....
Posted on 09-08-2022 13:21 | By @###
This man is not fit to stand as an mp. His integrity leaves much to be desired. One lie after another, claiming leadership knew, then we discover they didn't, guilt must have been to heavy as he realised eventually this would come out. Apology some 20 years later because he had aspirations to become a knight in shining armor and save us from a government that has bent over backwards to keep businesses afloat and try and save as many lives as possible due to covid with their mandates. I recall his campaign signage in Bethlehem claiming he was going to do wonders with his power and stop gang violence, what do you call this? ? I'd say he's no different. Karma is a B...
and yet yadick,
Posted on 09-08-2022 13:56 | By R. Bell
you fail to support those fourteen and fifteen year olds who commit lesser crimes. There is no glory in ever being a bully, especially to children years younger. Once a bully always a bully, it just takes a different form. We don't need bullies of any kind in parliament.
The panel
Posted on 09-08-2022 14:25 | By Merlin
The selection panel chose not to tell the hierarchy and accordingly hoped it would be hidden from those who should have been told especially the voters .Since they lost the election they have had 5 Leaders and 5 Shadow finance spokesperson 2 of which made billions of dollars errors in their shadow budgets. Not much stability and it make you wonder what is next.
Schrodinger's teen offender
Posted on 09-08-2022 16:31 | By This Guy
Funny that when read about other youths/teens committing crimes here, it's all "THEY SHOULD BE SEVERELY PUNISHED! THROW THE BOOK AT THEM!" in the comments - but now we're learning of this MP doing something appalling as a teen and suddenly it's "They don't know what they're doing at that age, no need to be so harsh on the guy!"
16
Posted on 09-08-2022 16:35 | By FRANKS
Most 16 year olds do very stupid things..............
Sorry Sam
Posted on 09-08-2022 18:50 | By Tga Citizen
Sorry Sam, but when you complained during the radio interview this morning on the National programme that you were also a victim, because you had to change your plans, you lost my support. The only victim was the 13 year old you, as part of a group, beat up. I voted for you in the by-election, but next election I hope the Act candidate stands again as they will get my vote. Also, if we are willing to excuse 16 year old's for crimes because they are not old enough to make proper decisions, why are some suggesting they should vote?
Do people change?
Posted on 09-08-2022 19:14 | By morepork
That seems to be the question. I believe they can, because I have seen it. I also know that sometimes people have a cathartic experience that helps them see the NEED for change. "The leopard does not change its spots." A popular aphorism but it doesn't really help, and it ASSUMES there will be no change. I believe that, given the right stimulus and encouragement, previous bad behavior CAN be changed and regulars here will know that my posts reflect that. This is a more optimistic stance than just assuming the worst. Life experience is a teacher that will change our minds about many things. We cannot grow unless it does.
It appears
Posted on 12-08-2022 09:49 | By Merlin
It appears now that Todd Mc Clay MP new of this and did not tell his Leader. What happened to their No Surprises policy.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.