Western BOP Council has $3.3m draft surplus

The Western Bay of Plenty District Council has a draft $3.3 million surplus for the 2021 financial year. File photo / SunLive.

The Western Bay of Plenty District Council has finished the 2021 financial year with a draft $3.3 million surplus.

The unaudited annual financial result was presented to the council's Performance and Monitoring Committee last Thursday.

Chief financial officer David Jensen said the surplus is primarily driven through underspends and personnel costs.

'We're all aware of the environment we're operating in.”

During Thursday meeting Jensen said one of the areas of underspend is the council's operating projects.

'There's been well publicised difficulties getting money out the door and executing some of those contracts and that's showing in our surplus.”

According to Jensen's report, total operating expenditure was $104.21 million, $3.02m lower than the full year budget.

The major variances were the additional level of service projects of $5.66m were $4.069m lower than the full year budget of $9.73m.

Also, personnel costs of $26.78m being $581,000 lower than the full year budget of $27.37m. The report said this was largely due to the timing of when open vacancies were filled throughout the year

'As always the improvement in your balance sheet makes everybody happy,” said Mayor Garry Webber during the meeting.

Mayor Garry Webber. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

He warned of the need to include the impact of depreciation in the revaluation of assets that was currently underway.

'When you tell everybody what the valuation brings through you need to advise them of the impact of depreciation.

'That's what you have to swallow at the same time and it takes a bit of a gloss off it because that will have to be budgeted going forward.”

Council staff are currently working with external valuers to revalue the council's assets to reflect the likely replacement cost as at June 30.

'Ordinarily council revalues its assets every three years but with the movements over the last 12 months in construction costs and inflation we have been requested to go out and revalue all of our assets this year as well,” said Jensen.

He agreed with Webber about depreciation.

Councillor James Denyer wanted to know how capital expenditure was proceeding, now that lockdowns had ended.

Councillor James Denyer. Photo: Merle Cave/SunLive.

Jensen said the financial achievement of the capital programme was a little over 70 per cent.

'With council's around the country the average achievement across New Zealand for the last financial year is between 50 and 80 per cent.

'I think council's done very well in terms of the experiences of other councils.

'Obviously what happens moving forward will depend on the contractor market.

'There's a lot of things that may be outside council's control but we are working very closely with our suppliers to try and do the best we can.”

The total capital expenditure of $40.38 million was $22.34 million lower than the full year budget.

Jensen said financial contributions were 'largely on budget” as well, with a 'very, very small” underachievement.

He said after speaking to developers and the planning team it was unlikely council would achieve the full budget for financial contributions for the 2022 financial year.

Developers had expressed 'some concern” around the ability of banks to lend money to people buying new properties, said Jensen.

'Some of the developers are feeling a little gun shy around releasing new sections onto the market if the banks aren't going to be lending to consumers.

'So, just some constraint there in the pipeline that we have seen coming for this financial year in terms of new development.”

Jensen closed his report to the committee saying the council had met all of its key performance indicators for the year.

'We've done as much as we can, but there are a lot of instances where we haven't been able to spend all of the budgets.”

The financial result will now face auditors, as per standard procedure, then be signed off by the council.

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.

6 comments

Further surplus?

Posted on 08-08-2022 18:04 | By The Professor

Maybe the Council should have a look at resourcing to see 8f they can cut the personnel costs further. I am sure they could if they looked hard enough!! Maybe look at the salaries too.....who's being paid too m7ch for their job title e.g. the Mayor. And whilst they are at it, abandon some of the nice to have projects. Remember, thos is ratepayers money and times are hard for all.


Awesome

Posted on 09-08-2022 09:46 | By Mr Dobalina

They managed to spend less than they earned . . . . apparently. Bravo, just what regular folk achieve in their day to day lives. Barely newsworthy, with respect to Sunlive.


Rates Hike Still Coming!

Posted on 09-08-2022 13:07 | By Justin T.

Ahhh.... nice to hear that the system is healthy, but then we are paying some of the highest rates in NZ..... AND..... unlike some districts, there's a Water Rate to boot as well. Good thing we are all stinking rich due to high paying jobs. (Note of sarcasm for those that missed it!).


Was wondering

Posted on 09-08-2022 14:40 | By Potofstu

Why I got a water shut down notice from downer that said they are the three waters contractors I thought this wasn’t even law yet


just a thought Mr Dobalina....

Posted on 09-08-2022 19:35 | By groutby

......'they managed to spend less than they earned"....they didn't 'earn' a cent, they took it!...like all other ratepayer dependent councils....by force....


Council surplus

Posted on 13-08-2022 12:25 | By tia

I can't understand how the Council/Elected members can gloat over having a surplus of $3m when you look around the district and see roads not well maintained, kerbs and cesspits covered in detritus, roads marked out for patching and nothing done for month after month. So, sure you are going to have a surplus.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.