Three Waters issues still unclear - Commissioners

Tauranga City Council commissioners Bill Wasley, Stephen Selwood, Anne Tolley and Shadrach Rolleston. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

A lack of recognition of Tauranga's water assets in the Three Waters Reform does ratepayers 'a huge disservice” according to commission chair Anne Tolley.

'There's shareholding based on population, but not the value of the asset that has been built up over generations,” said Tolley.

The comments were made at a Tauranga City Council meeting this week, where staff presented their analysis of the Three Waters working group's recommendations.

The working group was set up to advise the government on concerns with the reform, that will see waste, drinking and stormwater managed by four regional entities instead of the nation's 67 councils.

The group made 47 recommendations and the government agreed to adopt 44 of them, in some form, into the legislation.

One of the concerns was privatisation and this was addressed through the recommendation that council's have one share in their regional entity per 50,000 people.

This means Tauranga would have four shares in Entity B.

Tauranga City Council's water services have been assessed by the Department of Internal Affairs as the fourth best in the country.

Tolley said there was no recognition of this in the shareholding model.

'We are investing in what is probably the most modern water treatment system, in Waiāri, in the country,” she said.

'Yet there's no recognition of that for us in what has been proposed. And I think on behalf of the ratepayers, I'm really, really concerned about that.”

The Waiāri Water Supply Scheme involves development of a water abstraction facility on the Waiāri Stream, a water treatment plant in No.1 Road, Te Puke, and an underground water pipeline from the plant to Pāpāmoa. Construction is expected to be completed this year.

Commissioner Stephen Selwood shared Tolley's concerns about shareholding.

'I personally favour a clear shareholding representation that is based on net assets brought to the table which I think would be much clearer and fairer,” he said.

Tolley was also concerned there was no place for ratepayers to have a say other than through the parliamentary submission process.

She said council received 'hundreds of emails” from the community asking for a referendum on the reforms to be held.

'There is a misunderstanding about the reform process. This is a government-mandated reform – it's happening to us, not because of us,” said Tolley.

'A local referendum will not stop the reform and would be a complete waste of time and money. 'The only way people can have their say and seek to influence the reform is through the Government's parliamentary process,” Tolley said in a statement after the meeting.

During the meeting Selwood said he did not agree with a referendum either but wanted clearer communication from the government with the public.

'The other big issue for me is the failure to date, of the government, to clearly explain the benefits of these reforms,” he said.

'My view is they are significant, but they are not understood by the community.”

Tolley agreed: 'The main concern that we all share is that so much of this massive piece of reform is not well understood by the public.”

'There's little clarity about how it all fits together and it's being rushed and that sounds like a recipe for disaster.”

She suggested making the council's submission on the legislation available to the public to make sure they have everything covered.

'That might be another step in the process that will give our seriously disaffected ratepayers a say,” said Tolley

'In addition to their individual right to submit on a piece of legislation.”

Selwood supported the idea and said it was a 'much better mechanism” than a referendum as Three Waters was a 'complex issue”.

Other 'significant issues” that need to be addressed from a Tauranga perspective identified by council staff include, mana whenua roles and responsibilities and governance arrangements.

As well as meeting the community's growth and development needs, funding availability, managing stormwater infrastructure and the fair transfer of debt.

Te Rangapū Mana Whenua o Tauranga Moana (the representative group for iwi and hapū in Tauranga) agreed that there was still a lot of information about the reform to come to light.


Chair of Te Rangapū Mana Whenua o Tauranga Moana Matire Duncan said while there was much detail yet to be revealed, Te Rangapū are pleased to see a high degree of alignment with mātauranga Maōri in the government's recommendations.

'We see great value in a high degree of community ownership, the preservation of the local voice and the value that a strong Māori perspective at all levels can bring to benefit the entire community,” said Duncan in a statement.
'We will continue to work closely in partnership with Tauranga City Council to ensure Tauranga Moana is protected throughout these changes.”

The council resolved to advocate for community concerns to be addressed and to support community involvement in the legislative process.

It would also begin separate work to prepare for the transition to the new entity.

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.


10 comments

No three waters

Posted on 27-05-2022 18:11 | By Kancho

The government does not want people to understand what they are pushing through. They have shown they are not competent. Kiwi build a prime example of lots of money, talk and smoke and mirrors with no results. They want iwi to be fifty percent governance and worse have ability to levee water supply. No one owns water. Ratepayers own the distribution and treatment and as stated in Tauranga some of the best in NZ. Untried bureaucracy by an poor performance government not required. Give council some of the tax they take from us to continue to provide water. We need more supply to cover the growth . Wait for the next election to get rid of this and the government too


unclear

Posted on 27-05-2022 18:16 | By dumbkof2

there is nothing unclear about it. mahuta will go ahead with it. all these words by tolley and co are only camoflage to make us think otherwise


WELL here comes MORE

Posted on 27-05-2022 23:07 | By The Caveman

DEBIT for the Tauranga Ratepayers !!!!!


Hmmm

Posted on 28-05-2022 12:09 | By Let's get real

When you're beholden to a politician for your job, you're extremely unlikely to tell her NO... It's not surprising that we're seeing a lack of honesty and integrity.


I hope

Posted on 28-05-2022 14:53 | By Merlin

I hope previous political ties by some of the Commissioners do not cloud their thinking .I note 44 of the 47 working groups recommendations have been adopted by government so they have been listening.


unclear

Posted on 30-05-2022 14:20 | By dumbkof2

what is abundently clear is that these unelected comms have to go


3 waters...

Posted on 30-05-2022 17:41 | By morepork

... came out of the He Puapua recommendations designed to give Maori a greater say in resources than their 17% of the population earns them. The whole report, along with "co-governance", and separate entities for Education, Law, Health, and even Government, should be dismissed as the sham that it is, basing Government on Tradition and Racial grounds. Maori have as much right as anybody else in the country, no more, no less... The future for mokopuna and tamariki of Aotearoa, is exactly the same as it is for the children and grandchildren of New Zealand. (The beautiful thing is that the kids are fine with it; its the adults who sow mistrust and entrench race based bias (on both sides of the fence...) ) I believe we have a diverse culture that we can and should be proud of. Three waters, and its ilk don't belong here.


@ morepork.........

Posted on 31-05-2022 20:50 | By groutby

.....yes, yes and yes....how do we become realistic from idealistic though?......


More Nonsense

Posted on 31-05-2022 22:17 | By [email protected]

For crying out loud you bunch of UNELECTED bureaucrats...the community DOES UNDERSTAND ...do not belittle us with your twisted rhetoric....STANDUP & Stand BESIDE US....WE PAY YOUR EXORBITANT FEES...[they certainly cannot be wages because wages are earnt..]


@groutby

Posted on 01-06-2022 15:40 | By morepork

Thanks for the support (I enjoy your posts). I'll try and answer your question, thus: We start with ideals. Decency, fairness, transparent, open, Democratic, Government...,Social Justice, true equality under the Law. People who need help, get it. (Support the needy, not the greedy...). When actions are proposed, we measure them against these ideals and see how well the proposals fit these guidelines. We then discuss and adjust until a feasible compromise is reached. This is "realistic". It might not be "ideal" but it won't be dishonest and immoral, either. The duty of a Democracy is to implement realistic solutions, that are as close to ideal as possible, with due regard to the minorities. If you lose a vote you do a better job of persuading and stating your case, for next time. You don't terrorize the community until you get your way... It is realism, aspiring to be ideal.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.