Must be a better way
I note the projects manager, Tauranga City Council, Howard Severinsen reports the Christchurch Tsunami warning sirens may not have been heard for two reasons, one being that as this was a test the loudness would not have been at the level it would be if they were being used in an actual emergency. Pardon me; but why would anyone test any equipment intending to propose its use, at any level other than its best. The suggestion is ridiculous, as is the whole idea of the use of sirens – unless of the standard of the bombing warnings in the UK during World War II, 72 years ago. The effective technology was available then.
Pursuing the path of a warning system based on sirens seems to be a waste of time and money. Surely, with the massive advances made in communications, there must be a simpler and more direct way of setting up a Tsunami warning system. I hope someone in this field can enter into the debate. After all, we are already frequently subjected to at least three regular users of sirens as warning systems.
Barry H Walker, Mt Maunganui


2 comments
in response to Barry
Posted on 04-08-2012 14:57 | By Papamoaner
You are right Barry except that technologies like bulk texting have not worked overseas because the system immediately clogs up due to sudden mass usage, so sirens are still one of the best tools, but they must penetrate and have low maintenance,otherwise they are just a waste of money
MAKE IT LOUD
Posted on 05-08-2012 11:37 | By TERMITE
is better, the more punters get to hear it the more lives will be saved, how simple can it get!
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.