Tauranga's civic precinct has been given the green light and the full $303 million project will be realised.
During a Tauranga City Council meeting on Tuesday the commissioners unanimously approved delivering Te Manawataki o Te Papa in full, as a single phased approach.
Te Manawataki o Te Papa will occupy the area between Wharf Street and Hamilton Street in central Tauranga.
It includes a library, museum, civic whare (a venue for council and community meetings), an exhibition space and upgrading Baycourt Community and Arts Centre.
Masonic Park will also be upgraded and connections to the water will be improved through a waterfront reserve.
Commission chair Anne Tolley said because of formal submissions and conversations with the community, she was 'very comfortable” that the community had a 'good understanding” that although the precinct was 'a lot of money, it's a major part of the CBD's reboot”.
Ratepayers will be expected to pay about $152 million of the cost of Te Manawataki o te Papa, the other $150m is expected to come from asset recycling and grants.
During the council's month long annual and long-term plan consultation it asked people which of two options they would prefer for Te Manawataki o Te Papa.
Option one was the full precinct, the other was a scaled back version that included a library and community hub and the civic whare, at a cost of $126.8 million.
Council received 628 submissions about the precinct with 450 (72 per cent) in support of option one, compared to 128 (20 per cent) that supported the second option. Fifty people (8 per cent) chose "no option".
'This is reflecting the hopes and dreams of many, many people in the city over the last 10 to 15 years,” said Tolley.
'We can feel the weight of history on our shoulders, that we have the opportunity and that's a unique opportunity that we have to bring all that to life.”
During the meeting project partner Willis Bond's director Wayne Silver, warned of escalation costs of $32 million.
He said this was because of inflation and building costs, but this would be absorbed by the $303 million budget.
Silver also identified areas of ground that had a risk of liquefaction and would need a 12 month settling period.
This meant the civic whare, and exhibition centre would likely require piling. The edge of the museum was also on that land, he said.
Silver recommended starting construction on the library first, followed by the museum as it was on 'relatively stable” ground.
Delaying construction of the civic whare was necessary to take account of infrastructure issues, he said.
Another view of the precinct. Supplied image.
Tolley was in favour of getting the museum underway 'as soon as we possibly can”.
Silver also presented a number of potential enhancements that included solar panels, grey water recycling and timber facades to achieve a six Green star building certification and offset carbon.
Tolley said the enhancements were aspirational and not what the council had consulted on.
"We've said if there are cost escalations, if significant, we have to come back to the public. Before we have that conversation there may be other ways," she said.
The building's facades are yet to be decided but council is expected to make a decision in time for resource consent to be lodged at the end of October.
Commissioner Stephen Selwood said the precinct was an opportunity to catalyse transformation of the whole Ta Papa peninsula.
Te Papa peninsula is the area from State Highway 29A and Barkes Corner down to the Tauranga Marina.
'This is an opportunity for the community right across the whole city to enjoy the CBD as it will be in the future,” said Selwood.
He said it will have environmental, cultural, social and 'significant economic” benefits right across the city and wider sub region.
Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston said one of the key things that came from community engagement was 'do it once, do it right”.
'The city has a history of doing it once and doing it again and again,” he said.
'This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to make bold decisions to enhance and move the city forward.”
Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ on Air.




29 comments
What a complete waste of money!!!
Posted on 24-05-2022 16:44 | By The Professor
Who wants a museum? Who reads books? Do we really need meeting rooms? The money which is going to be spent here.....and it will be double that, mark my words, would be better spent elsewhere or reducing expense to the rate payer. Waste!!!
First language
Posted on 24-05-2022 17:16 | By Johnney
I visited the library and all notices are boldly in Maori as if it’s our first language. I notice all future developments are headed in Maori and are meaningless without an English translation.
Oh goodie
Posted on 24-05-2022 17:19 | By Kancho
Year on year rate increases . All for a minority . Nothing stood spending borrowed money especially other people's money while they all have noses in the trough
Disgraceful
Posted on 24-05-2022 17:33 | By Let's get real
Four unelected appointees have decided unanimously to spend other peoples money and run away before the final costs are realised and decided. All of this public spending should have been decided by a referendum of all ratepayers, because these commissioners have not been given a mandate to make these decisions by those of us paying their wages.
told you so
Posted on 24-05-2022 18:45 | By dumbkof2
a few more millions wasted on a tolley/mahuta foregone conclusion
Tenby
Posted on 24-05-2022 18:54 | By Slim Shady
I thought we were “insolvent”?
Dumb
Posted on 24-05-2022 18:57 | By Slim Shady
Good time to build. Building materials are cheap as chips right now. Skilled workers are bumping into each other there are that many of them. I can see this going really well with no cock ups and coming in under budget.
Wow
Posted on 24-05-2022 20:10 | By Informed
Comment of the week ‘who reads books’ - that says all you need to know about those holding back Tauranga.
This Is Disgusting
Posted on 24-05-2022 21:09 | By Yadick
What of these 'new' commercial ventures are actually going to bring life to our city. How are they going to attract 'more' people to our city and bring the mighty dollar back. We already have a library, we already have a place of history called the Historic Village which is massively under utilized and has the potential to be so much more. As The Professor says, do we really need meeting rooms, they're not going to attract people to shop in our city. I think it was Fernhill22 that had a stunner of a vision to create the waterfront. This is a nice to have but far, far from a need. Again, to quote The Professor, what a complete waste of money.
Fools in charge of the city.
Posted on 24-05-2022 21:13 | By brianwbrown
Are Tolley and her crew barking mad.What part of we dont have the money for this project doesnt she get.As for giving it this stupid long handled name which was obviously gifted by local Maori at considerable cost equally as dumb.How much evidence do people need that taking these gifted names for every organisation landmark or street just courts disaster.Dont know why that occurs but look around you and you will see the evidence.I am more than happy for someone to give me just one example of an organisation or project that became better because of the name change to that which less than 16% of the population have any inkling of its meaning and whats more have no interest in knowing why.
YES - the stated COST
Posted on 24-05-2022 21:17 | By The Caveman
WIll be DOUBLE the 300 odd million stated today. Rates in Tauranga are bad enough today. When these developments DON'T get the projected revenue (AND they NEVER will - remember this post), the "council" will be in the S __T and rates will go through the roof to pay the DEBT. Time to sell my last property holdings in Tauranga !!!
Rejuvenate CBD.
Posted on 25-05-2022 05:32 | By R Goodall
Fools think they know everything. They don't learn from history. They don't learn from books. They don't listen to other people. They whinge and moan and carry placards. We need this development before the Commissioners leave.
The farce continues
Posted on 25-05-2022 08:12 | By an_alias
Next we will start to see the budget blow outs and the complete disaster of a roll out. A constant drain on Tauranga will be the council and museum.
cost
Posted on 25-05-2022 10:14 | By dumbkof2
is there any way that the submissions can be seen by the public. i for one dont believe that so many people voted to have this nice to have. all the comments i have seen have been 10 to 1 against
museum
Posted on 25-05-2022 10:17 | By dumbkof2
so the museum wanters got their way through the back door. i dont believe so many people wanted one. something smells somewhere
Asset Recycling
Posted on 25-05-2022 10:30 | By RML
FOR Payment OF THIS IDEA ,QUOTE:"the other $150 m is expected to come from asset recycling" Yea like selling 3 Waters; Bugger off...
@Informed
Posted on 25-05-2022 10:40 | By The Professor
The point I was trying to make regarding books, is the fact that libraries all over are under utilized and this is mainly due to the internet. Most resources are now available online. I don't think we need to spend millions to satisfy the minority.
Commissioners not listening to their community
Posted on 25-05-2022 12:28 | By Omni
Wow yet another overpriced waste of money. Our roads are diabolical as is our crime and homelessness, yet this is going to improve Tauranga some how. Unfortunately it is time for these overpaid commissioners to bugger off and get some genuine people voted in to council who care about this place and will actually listen to the majority and make real positive improvements to the Bay of Plenty while being financially aware and accountable.
Why is anyone surprised?
Posted on 25-05-2022 12:44 | By morepork
Tolley and her cronies were always going to do whatever they wanted to, because they are unaccountable to anyone. I don't mind a museum, but I object to the fact that it was voted on and the result has been ignored. This development will definitely make certain people very rich; whether it revitalizes the CBD remains to be seen. This exercise has simply reinforced and demonstrated what life under a tribal tikanga style Government is like. You do as the Boss says and dissent will not be recognized or tolerated. Referenda that return unfavorable results are simply ignored, or Laws are quickly passed to make the referendum illegal. The fundamental concepts of Democracy are not spoken about or understood. The traditional form of tribal government must be superior because it worked in the 19th century before Western people arrived with their new-fangled ideas. Labour and its partners must go!
Delusions of the usual
Posted on 25-05-2022 15:46 | By R. Bell
minority come to the surface yet again. Anti everything, claiming to be the majority when the math proves otherwise, disbelieving of facts that disagree with their view. R. Goodall puts it best, fools are incapable of changing because they reject progress, because progress scares them. The commissioners answer to the minister, who in turn answer to the electorate. It's called democracy.
Do it once, do it right
Posted on 25-05-2022 16:45 | By Slim Shady
Like Kulim Park? The paint is still wet and they’re back cutting sections out of the new concrete path already. That’s just a concrete path, not an entire CBD. Even I can lay a concrete path right first time correctly.
Delusional indeed
Posted on 26-05-2022 10:33 | By Slim Shady
Anybody who thinks this is a good idea in the current environment should look up Auckland Council and it’s Mount Eden development. Developers are either walking away, going bust or quadrupling the price.
Distressing
Posted on 26-05-2022 10:38 | By B.C.
I truly despair at the direction this city is going in. Check out the TCC website & what these characters are planning. There's lots of language in the official presentation like "The rational grid of the city and it buildings is shaped by movement of metaphorical water flowing down the site" (sic) but absolutely no mention of cars or roads. They're closing The Strand to traffic! Let that sink in, the entire development from Durham Street will slice through the guts of the city, completely cutting off traffic and removing all the car parks at the harbourside area. The library and unwanted museum makes up nearly 50% of the cost. Those responsible for this sabotage, this civic vandalism, will be long gone & unaccountable as the effects are imposed on future generations.
Concrete Jungle
Posted on 26-05-2022 11:41 | By Bruce Rainey
Where are the windows or are these buildings to house the Mushroom People (kept in the dark and fed on B***shit)
Thank you, Let's Get Real.
Posted on 26-05-2022 13:21 | By morepork
These are exactly my own thoughts on the subject. We need to restore democratic process and have engagement from the people of Tauranga on prioritizing MAJOR works expenditures. (say, over $100,000,000) I believe it should be an annual online poll, with all citizens on the Electoral Roll eligible, deciding the priority for works that could be undertaken (or at least the top 5...), and the results should decide the percentage of available development funding that goes to each project. The project voted highest priority gets most of the money, and so on... Council identify the projects, allow debate over them, and set up the online priority poll. They then administer the Projects in accordance with the poll results. Just because we have never done this, does not mean that it COULDN'T be done. I reckon it SHOULD be. It would guarantee engagement between community and Council.
@R. Bell & R. Goodall
Posted on 26-05-2022 13:34 | By morepork
I'm amazed you suggest we should get this done before the Commission leave. Leaving aside the entire questions of whether we can afford it or whether we want it, what gives you confidence that this project would be complete before the Commission leaves? Have you seen past experience? The costs and the time will blow out just like it ALWAYS does... The fact that many people object to something that is being implemented, mostly because it looks good on an unelected Commissioner's CV, does not make them fools. The right to wave a placard or dissent in other (legal) ways, is a Democratic fundamental, but you don't seem in favour of that. Perhaps you have bought into the rhetoric of Rawiri Waititi: "We don't want Democracy... Democracy means that the majority rule." (In fact, it means that the LAW rules and applies equally to EVERYBODY)
@Robin Bell
Posted on 26-05-2022 17:43 | By Let's get real
You know full well that "The Minister" answers only to her Maori electorate. When she's not asleep at the wheel or on the phone to our overseas consulates. 29 years in parliament and still unable to make well thought through decisions. One of my favourite words to describe current ministerial activities... "Inept"...
Morepork,
Posted on 26-05-2022 19:34 | By R. Bell
don't be amazed, be thankful. The commission has made enormous progress since the sacking of inadequate councilors. Central city development is a core responsibility of government WORLDWIDE. We are no exception. There is no doubt in my mind that when the commission is replaced, the usual fanatical influencers that belong to the various self appointed "ratepayers' groups will again raise their ugly presence, and progress will stall yet again. History repeats. Your objection based on the nonsensical view that the commissioners are concerned about their CV is yet another pathetic attempt to denigrate the legitimate governance we all deserve, put it alongside your obsession with denigrating the current government, and along side the dozen or so obsessive objectors below.
@R. Bell
Posted on 30-05-2022 18:54 | By morepork
My comment about the Commissioner's CVs is just a personal opinion (I was unable to find any other reason why they would be so profligate with OUR money...) I don't denigrate "the Government"; I denigrate the ACTIONS of THIS Government. And you have no right to label anyone "obsessive" while you're still carrying that huge chip on your shoulder about past wrongs to Maori. Don't confuse passion with obsession. I am passionate about saving our Democracy. That means removing this Government. Its not personal, it is because of the unacceptable things they have done. I might vote Labour sometime in the future; I might not. I do know the current coalition is devastatingly bad for NZ and NZers, and I vehemently want it gone. I want a diverse nation with equality under the Law for EVERYBODY. Unlike Mr. Rawiti, I see DEMOCRACY as the best road to that.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.