Health services trump racing in Tauranga

The greenfield space at the Tauranga Racecourse Reserve is being considered for its future use. Photo. John Borren/Sun Media.

The potential for health services has come out as the top option for the future use of the Tauranga Racecourse Reserve according to council analysis.

Tauranga City Council has consulted with the community on the best use of the 85 hectares of crown land that is currently leased by Racing Tauranga and Tauranga Golf Club.

The land was permanently reserved as a recreation ground and racecourse in the late 1800s and the clubs have a lease until 2039.

The Greerton Maarawaewae study report will be considered by the commissioners at a council meeting on Monday. A decision of the reserve's future use is expected in June.

The study sought feedback on seven options, these included leaving the land as is, an enhanced use of the space by adding active recreational facilities and a community centre while retaining the golf course and race course.

The other five options removed the racecourse while retaining the golf course and added a community centre, two included housing and the final option included a health services site with active recreation.

From these options, four have been shortlisted through multi criteria analysis and none of them include the racecourse.

Council programme director of urban communities Carl Lucca said the criteria took into account the community engagement and the city's needs as it grows.

Consultants placed 20 per cent weight on future health needs, 25 to 30 per cent to housing, 25 to 30 per cent on green space and active recreation, 10 per cent to existing stakeholders and 15 to 20 per cent to cost.

More than 650 pieces of feedback were received from the community. They showed 'extremely strong' support for retaining/creating multipurpose greenspace and increased access to Kopurerua Valley that runs below the reserve.

Very strong support was shown for creating active recreation spaces, some support for relocating the racecourse and equestrian facilities if suitable land was found and not much support for relocating the golf club.

There was limited support for housing on the reserve and some support for a public health precinct.

Health services were a late entry into the study and despite having little detail to consult with the community on, the council's criteria has ranked it first.

Bay of Plenty District Health Board CEO Pete Chandler. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

Bay of Plenty District Health Board CEO Pete Chandler said in October last year the DHB advised council they were in the early stages of a business case for the future needs of the Tauranga hospital campus.

After consultation with council, mana whenua and the government it was agreed the option for health services would be included in the conversation with community, he said.

'We're only just starting out on this process and the community conversation is focused on ideas for use of the reserve land in the next 10, 20, 30 and 50 years.

'However, if we know that there is support for the possibility of utilising some of the land, given its ideal location, this will significantly help us in putting together our business case options,” said Chandler.

If reserve land were made available for health services it would involve relocating specific hospital services - yet to be determined - as a new build, he said.

The reserve land is currently zoned as a passive open space and is further identified as a scheduled site to be protected as open space and for recreation activities.

Protecting this status is crucial for mana whenua, and representatives of Ngāi Tamarāwaho hapū lodged a claim via the Treaty of Waitangi Act in February.

Hapū representative Buddy Mikaere said if the status were to change to enable housing for example, that would trigger the claim.

Ngāi Tamarāwaho representative Buddy Mikaere. File image/SunLive.

The land was confiscated after the Battle of Gate Pa in 1865 and because the land was being used for public good the hapū didn't pursue it as part of their treaty settlement, said Mikaere.

He is also a Racing Tauranga trustee and wants to see the racecourse remain.

'The initial reasoning, for establishing it as a recreational reserve was because it was a racecourse.

'It's got a long heritage and a long history in Tauranga,” said Mikaere.

Carl McComb, chairman of both Racing Tauranga and Tauranga Racecourse Reserve Charitable Trust, said they want to continue racing on the reserve which has been their home for 150 years.

The club have been pragmatic about sharing the space with other users.

'We recognise that enhanced community use has got to be factored in,” said McComb

'The city is growing and we've got to look at the area in 10, 20 years' time and how do we all fit in?”

He said the Greerton Maarawaewae study is about providing certainty for users and the club is open to exploring all the options.

'Our preference is to continue racing on the reserve.”

'We still hope the commissioners make the right decision and do what's best recognising us as an historic user,” said McComb.

Further engagement with whenua and existing Tauranga Racecourse Reserve users has been recommended by council ahead of a decision from the commissioners in June.

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.

You may also like....

9 comments

no surprises

Posted on 08-04-2022 19:15 | By dumbkof2

tolly will do what she wants. not what youor i want


Ah, YES, one way or another

Posted on 08-04-2022 22:31 | By The Caveman

the LABOUR G'ment wants to destroy the biggest GREEN space in Tauranga and come hell or high water they will do it - Tauranga is a National stronghold and MUST be taught a lesson !!


Change Needed.

Posted on 09-04-2022 13:06 | By Hardman

Green space in Tauranga used for what? Horse racing is dying, gambling does not benefit anyone. This area can be put to better use. Health and housing are needed.


Green space...?

Posted on 09-04-2022 18:08 | By Let's get real

The only people able to use the space pay for the privilege... Let Ngai Tamarawaho put in a claim for the land and prevent the construction of health services and housing that might assist their own people and instead keep the personal income flowing from directorships and free membership to the golf club.


Green space for the elite

Posted on 09-04-2022 20:04 | By Informed

Green space sure, but no for most of the community. The rich want to hold on to their space.


Commisioners

Posted on 10-04-2022 10:55 | By bruce.deirdre@xtra.co.nz

Why is it that these overpaid, non elected people continue to try and make decisions that are the responsibilty of and to be paid for by current and future ratepayers...this all so totally undemocratic...the last elected council only had ONE member who endeavoured to walk rough-shod over the rest...he quit...problem solved


Bollocks!

Posted on 10-04-2022 13:08 | By morepork

The stupid argument that this is a playground for the rich elite, evaporates when you see families picnicking on the grass at Race meetings. It is a green space that the iwi have let us use because they see the use is good for everybody. Only a mind constrained by an Administration Office could see this space being anything OTHER than green. We know we have no say in what happens, but the Commissioners will bear responsibility for this and it will be a crowning triumph for all the things they got wrong.


@Morepork

Posted on 11-04-2022 12:08 | By Let's get real

By their own admission, the racing club is used only 12 times a year... Describe the council land in all the glorious terms that you wish, but for the majority of the year it is held for the sole use of subscription holders. It's NOT usable green space for the ratepayers of the city as are any and all of the REAL public spaces in the city. Tear down the six foot fences, put in some seating and a children's playground and only then can it be viewed as public green space.


@Let's get real

Posted on 12-04-2022 12:33 | By morepork

I think there is more going on there than just the 12 official race meetings per year. But I do take your point. It ISN'T a "public park" like Yatton Park or even Memorial Park, but I'm not sure that it needs to be. A children's play area could certainly be a good addition and kids could use it even on race days. For me, it is virtually justified by 12 race meetings a year, but if some added value can be found I see no real objection. The important thing is that we NEED green spaces and we shouldn't just trade them for more buildings. I probably go to the Races 3 times a year (not a fanatic) but I REALLY enjoy those days out, and so do many other non-members of the Racing society.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.