Tauranga City Council says pamphlets circulating about a proposed plan change relating to flooding from intense rainfall are making inaccurate claims and are considered 'scaremongering”.
The pamphlets have been distributed to properties in areas that may have a potential future flood risk.
Proposed Plan Change 27, which refers to flooding from intense rainfall events, introduces a new rule framework to manage the effects of flooding in intense rainfall events on people, properties and infrastructure.
Last month council sent letters to property owners about the proposed plan change which caused confusion for some residents, not long after the pamphlets were circulated.
Council city planning team leader Janine Speedy says the pamphlets are 'scaremongering” and encourages anyone who has received a copy to contact the council to get a true picture of what the proposed plan change means for their property.
Some claims made in the pamphlet are that the new rules will significantly reduce the value of people's home, prevent people from doing building work on their property, give council rights to use people's property without asking and increase people's insurance costs.
'The pamphlet makes a number of claims that are simply untrue and it's important that people understand that,” says Speedy.
Some of the key points council want people to know who have received the pamphlet are:
- The intent of the proposed plan change is to protect people's lives and property.
- Minor alterations and works, such as a 20m2 addition to a house or small shed, on an existing property will not need a resource consent. An example of where a resource consent maybe required is for a new solid fence that would restrict an overland flowpath, which could cause flooding effects on neighbouring properties
- The proposed change covers subdivision, land use and development. It does not give the council the right to use any property without prior consent; and it does not allow the council to create an easement on an existing property.
- Council has been releasing hazards information relating to flooding, inundation and erosion since 2014. There's no indication that any of the previous notifications have affected overall property values. Insurance costs would need to be discussed with insurers, noting that any new notifications relate to a 1-in-100-year storm event, and allow for future climate change and sea level rise.
Council invites anyone who is worried about the situation to contact them and arrange a one-on-one meeting or phone conversation to work through the issues, says Janine.
To date, council have spoken with more than 1000 residents at public information open days and had more than 220 one-on-one appointments to discuss the detail of the proposed plan change as it relates to particular properties.
'In most cases, I think people appreciated having a better understanding of what the proposal is seeking to achieve and what it means for them.”
Janine says the continuous updating of flooding information, including the rules proposed by plan change 27, is part of council's wider programme of understanding and living with natural hazards.
It is a function the council is required to undertake and is work that should be done to ensure that the city is resilient to natural hazards, she says.
People are able to make a submission about the plan change or seek a review of the flooding risk assessment for their property.
The deadline for submissions to the plan change has also been extended to February 1 from December 18 to give people more time to make submissions.
For more information call council on 07 577 7000 or visit the website.
6 comments
So then.......
Posted on 11-12-2020 20:58 | By groutby
...back to the pamphlet, have the issuing organisation been found, at very least been 'spoken to'....fined or perhaps hung?...that information seems a bit 'vague' to say the least.........
Scaremongering TCC
Posted on 12-12-2020 08:16 | By Slim Shady
If TCC were close to being competent this could have been avoided. The letter TCC sent out was not clear at all. That is when the scaremongering started - by them. Useless and overpaid.
Insurance
Posted on 12-12-2020 10:43 | By Kancho
So really at this point no-one actually know what insurance companies will do with this information. I would hazard a guess they will cover themselves by increasing premiums with any mention of water level risks as an excuse to charge more and thank you very much council . So saying it would need to be discussed with insurance company is just a council side step is it not.
Another TCC Spin Dr excuse.
Posted on 13-12-2020 10:09 | By xenasdad
So I am meant to believe the "Oh so competent TCC, who couldn't even get a letter of their intentions to the property owners until AFTER it had taken effect, and meeting dates had passed. The same "Big Brothers" who forced the Greerton gridlock stuff-up on us, and then had the gall to say, "we didn't do it to make traffic faster, but to make it safer". What other plans have they made while eating their playlunch ??
Tom Ranger
Posted on 14-12-2020 10:28 | By Tom Ranger
In light of these brochures providing possible roll-on affects that council believes are false/not going to happen. I'm sure TCC will have no problem signing some contract giving rate-payers assurance that they will not happen and how much compensation will be available if/when they do because logically I can see all those things happening at sometime. "significantly reduce the value of people’s home, prevent people from doing building work on their property, give council rights to use people’s property without asking and increase people’s insurance costs". No signed liability by council on these things? Hmm....no worries. I'll just base my trust in council on past performance....? Fail. No faith in TCC. 0%.
@Tom Ranger
Posted on 19-12-2020 14:09 | By morepork
Your point is excellent. If Council had addressed these things and given written assurances on them, there would be no need for "scaremongering" leaflets. Just another example of failure to engage with the Community, listen to them, and address their concerns.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.