Mount man’s views on non-self-contained van ban

Mathew Nash traversed Aotearoa in a non-self-contained vehicle in 2018. Supplied photos.

It has been a week now since Stuart Nash detailed his aim of attracting ‘high net worth' tourists to New Zealand.

As part of his strategy, the tourism minister outlined plans to ban non-self-contained campervan rental. Read more here.

In the process, this would mean stepping away from a policy of targeting backpackers and freedom campers.

Mount Maunganui man Mathew Nash's is in the unique position of having travelled around New Zealand in the way which under Nash's proposals might very soon become obsolete.

In the story below, Mathew shares his thoughts on Stuart Nash's proposal and his experience in travelling around New Zealand.

"In 2018 my lifelong dream of traversing Aotearoa came true in a non-self-contained vehicle.

"The trip thundered by until I inevitably ran out of cash. It was money I had scraped and saved for 18 months to afford."

Mathew says even then, hiring a self-contained camper was simply out of his economic reach.

"On my journey, I met plenty of freedom campers in the same position.

"None of them, myself included, did any ‘s******g' in New Zealand waterways as Nash anecdotally condemned last week.

"The overwhelming majority, like myself, had systems in place to ensure they left no trace."

He says a designated bin bag or box which could then be deposited responsibly, an emergency toilet system (a trick picked up from years of European music festival experience), or simply having the Campermates app downloaded on his phone, showing him where the nearest toilet or campsite was on any given route.

All of these methods helped maintain as green a footprint whilst travelling as possible, says Mathew

"Along my journey, I stayed in hostels, TOP 10s, DOC sites and freedom camping spots. Without doubt, those staying in the latter were most likely to take their rubbish with them, spend money in locally-owned cafes, or work in bars reliant on backpackers for staff.

"Speaking from experience, the higher-calibre tourists encountered tended to be less likely to implement the ‘sustainability brand' that Nash spoke of in his recent visit to Queenstown."

Mathew says there is nothing wrong with Nash's ambition to attract the cream of the crop to New Zealand.

Justifiably, ‘brand' New Zealand has never been more valuable, he says.

"We, as a collective group of remaining travellers who endured the lockdown, undoubtedly appreciate the excellence of this country in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic compared to some of our respective home nations.

"Banning non-self-contained vehicles does not need to be the solution.

"Ensuring that self-contained vehicles are more readily affordable, bathroom facilities are more easily available and identifiable to travellers on the road, and better education and enforcement of a leave-no-trace policy would help ensure the baby is not being thrown out with the bathwater."

He says it's certainly a more nuanced method than a blanket ban.

"However, if that is the route Nash is taking backpackers and campers still need to feel welcome and financially able to visit these envious shores.

"The champagne explorer simply won't cover the difference.

"When their respective Supplementary Seasonal Employment (SSE) visa kicks in many of these backpackers will happily help pick up the slack with New Zealand on its knees regarding a COVID-19 impacted labour shortage.

"Especially here in the Bay of Plenty.

"I struggle to imagine the high-paid tourists of New York or London that Nash wants to lure would be up for kiwi picking once they have had their ‘piece of paradise'."

You may also like....

4 comments

self contained?

Posted on 26-11-2020 10:00 | By Campresponsiblitly

The guy appears to be talking about "certified self containment' a NZStandard that is meant for use at only 'club level'. Self containment (without certification) is the basic ability to retain waste until proper facilities for disposal are available for use - Something not only every Freedom Camper should allude to, but everyone in our great green country. #RCAi


Generalisation

Posted on 26-11-2020 11:51 | By Kancho

Both the minister and this article make generalisation a plank of the argument. There have been areas left in appalling states as reported by locals and on TV too. It maybe a small minority but it doesn't take a lot to be a disgusting smell and visual horror. More facilities sure, but can't be everywhere. More policing sure if hefty fines to help pay for supervising staff. More information to tourists sure but strict compliance to offenders. In the end I my still with the minister, quality over quantity and no mucking about with wet bus ticket slap on the wrist. Locals as bad I suspect with dispicable behaviour.


An excellent article...

Posted on 26-11-2020 15:56 | By morepork

...which I endorse 100%. We should be open to ALL, not just the wealthy. As for Kancho's point about the disgusting mess: there will always be a small minority of irresponsible and uncaring people. You'll find them amongst rich tourists, poor tourists, and the local population. It's a sad reality. (If it weren't, we wouldn't need street cleaning facilities...). Fine people who are caught, and mark their passports if from overseas. Maybe they have to pay more for a visa next time and until they show they can be responsible.


Ban them!

Posted on 26-11-2020 17:26 | By jed

Or, at least reduce numbers. The problem is that there are too many people who choose to holiday in non-self contained vehicles. Maybe if number's were limited and hire companies could bid for an allocation. One anecdote is not representative. I've witnessed pollution around the coromandel, for example. Where did that come from if everyone were like Matthew Nash?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.