Bayfair ‘hospital’ pass

Dawn Picken's opinion piece [Bay of Plenty Times, August 24] – it is all very well her ‘Citizens Underdogs' for Bayfair Underpass raising their heads above the parapet at the death knell around election time. Where were protesters when underpass issues first surfaced, late 2018, when as long-time Bayfair residents we first wrote to the Minister of Transport about the crazy $13.3million costing for a new underpass, then ballooning a ludicrous $33 million. Those obscene costs could never be justified for the few pedestrians and lycra-clad cyclists brigade tunnel users.

Certainly, we readily agree retaining the existing underpass should have been factored into the equation by NZTA from the get-go as far the best financial option. NZTA pooh-poohed that idea, promoting a new underpass that was never feasible cost-wise. So why not an overpass similar to Route K/Windermere installations at $3.5million or better still install precast concrete box sections just below the road surface for substantially less.

For heaven's sake protesters get behind the two cost-effective practical solutions and stop bleating over spilt milk. It is grandstanding, knee-jerking by special interest groups and won't change NZTA mindsets. Citizens need to be proactive at the outset, not bottom of the cliff reactive.

Sally Paterson, Ohauiti

You may also like....

1 comment

The timeline facts

Posted on 14-09-2019 19:16 | By Concerned1

Facts sometime get in the way of a good story. NZTA agreeing to retain the underpass in November 2018 was the result of intense lobbying by all the interested groups of Tauranga and the regional council and city council. NZTA should have designed and priced the new underpass then. In July 2019 they canned the underpass with no consultation. If NZTA really wanted to build an underpass they would have made it the first part of project to be built. The protests that this writer attacks and tries to diminish, started after this unexpected cancelling of the underpass. Hardly last minute. The citizens have been there at every part of the journey, lobbying NZTA. What are the two cost effective practical solutions as mentioned? What you have is a govt organisation which lacks common sense and is tied to a toxic design & build contract.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.