Businesses oppose Tauranga marine research centre

The 5600m2 site is located at the entrance to the marina at Sulphur Point and is mainly undeveloped open space. Photos: Sharnae Hope

Businesses at Sulphur Point are opposing a proposal which seeks to establish a long-term lease between council and Waikato University on a previously identified open space at northern Sulphur Point.

Tauranga Marina Society, Tauranga Powerboat and Yacht Club, and Tauranga Fishing Club are some of many who have identified their opposition to the lease, which will enable the university to develop a marine research and educational facility.

The 5600m2 site is located at the entrance to the marina at Sulphur Point and is mainly undeveloped open space.

It’s used for marine activities, occasionally events and overflow car and trailer parking, and is available for the public to access and use.

Tauranga Marina Society manager Greg Prescott says the space being sought for lease by the university is not ideal.

“It’s a piece of greenspace, it’s in the marina plan and it’s not big enough for what they want to do.

“Realistically there’s no interest from either the berth owners or marina users to have a four-storey building placed there.”

Greg says if the lease goes ahead it will be a huge loss to all businesses and marine users at Sulphur Point.

“This whole area is almost like the last piece of land available for marine. Everything down here is zoned marine – a marine research centre is not for marine use, it’s for tertiary use.

“We have 130 trailers here and when they launch their boats they park their trailers on this space, as some of them don’t fit in a carpark. On top of this we’re also upgrading our marina which will mean we need that space to store equipment during the build.

“It’s going to be used heavily from now through until the next 10 years and beyond.”

At the beginning of 2017 the University of Waikato approached Council with the wish to work collaboratively towards establishing an internationally sought after, multidisciplinary research and educational facility close to the city centre at Sulphur Point.

Council identified one of the areas of open space at Northern Sulphur Point as the most feasible site for this significant economic development opportunity and carried out formal consultation from Monday, February 12 to Friday, March 9 2018.

Greg describes this consultation process as ‘horribly flawed’ and ‘biased’ in favour of the university.

“Especially when you look at the document they put out and how many times they mentioned Waikato University.

“A question was put out in a different document afterwards asking ‘do you support the loss of greenspace’ and that was what should have been on that first document.

“They painted this rosy picture of a university, what it was going to do – but only said the piece of land was down at the marina and gets little use, which isn’t true.”

Greg says Tauranga City Council's Economic Development & Investment Committee’s recent decision to support in principle the proposed long-term lease, is also disappointing.

The committee is made up of eight elected members including Max Mason, Kelvin Clout, Steve Morris and Leanne Brown who have voted for the lease; and John Robson, Mayor Greg Brownless, Larry Baldock and Rick Curach who voted against.

“Councillors haven’t listened to the 70 per cent of those who submitted and opposed this development,” says Greg.

 “What tipped it Waikato University’s way was that Max Mason voted for it and he’s the chairman, so essentially the vote goes in favour.

“It still has to go in front of elected members on July 19 and then there’s three other elected members who haven’t voted, so the vote still could go in favour of the Marina Society, Fishing Club and the Yacht and Boating Club.”

TCC says the proposed research centre will be distinctive to New Zealand.

“It will create the capacity to attract and host national and international collaborations and research programmes.

“Significant direct economic benefits to the city are expected through growth in student, researcher and administrative staff numbers; new local and international research; development partnerships and conferences as well as the development of marine products and technologies.

“The facility will also put Tauranga on the map as a home of world-class research specialised in marine research, biotech and engineering, and tertiary education.”

Tauranga Yacht and Powerboat club commodore Nick Wrinch says he thinks it’s a great idea, but agrees with Greg, the site is wrong.

“We’re opposed to the development, we’re concerned about traffic, the huge infrastructure which will need to go in and its cost.

“Water and sewerage need upgrading, the road is currently not very wide, there’s no pavement and one of the overriding issues for us, is once this land is lost it will be lost for recreational use forever.

“It’s our belief it was always intended for recreational use and we feel it’s wrong to use this for any other purpose.

“Tauranga is a growing city and the demand for land for recreational use is growing the same way as any other type of land.

“We feel the consultation process was not good, the information everyone was given was totally inadequate for a robust consultation.”

The decision will be taken to the full Council meeting on 19 July for ratification.

Find out more about the proposed marine facility and Council’s proposal at


...agree with these comments...

Posted on 28-06-2018 14:24 | By Border Patrol

..we also went to the information meetings held by the university and the deputy mayor and other council hanger ons. It was very obvious to us that Kelvin Clout and the other council staff were in favour of the location. Some very good arguments against the location were put forward, but he clearly didn’t want to know.

Donated land?

Posted on 28-06-2018 11:39 | By morepork

If Tundra and RJP are correct and the land was given in perpetuity for the purpose of marine recreation, then that is a deal breaker for the Marine research centre. If land is accepted by the City, with a condition, it must be honoured, otherwise nobody will be donating land for the use of all.

TCC At it again

Posted on 28-06-2018 08:30 | By RJP

Its sad to see that the TCC had manipulated the public survey and info days to get the result that they wanted. All the public meetings I attended there was a resounding NO to the location, but a yes to the concept of a facility such as this As the open days were all about promoting Waikato University I cant help wondering if there is a possible conflict of interest there somewhere It must be remembered it was the original "Bay of Plenty Harbour Board" that designated the area to the people of Tauranga for marine use and the TCC has inherited that agreement. If the TCC wants to change that then they need to be prepared for some very serious opposition

Public land

Posted on 27-06-2018 19:28 | By tundra

As I understand it,this land was made from reclaimed land.The Port of Tauranga did this.They then donated it to the Council on the condition it was keep as public land to be used for marine purposes.In other words boating related activities.Which this University is not!


Posted on 27-06-2018 12:58 | By rastus

In a previous letter I questioned how many of the public had been polled in respect of this lease to WU. It now appears that I was 100% correct in believing that the previous story by Max Mason was a figment of his overworked imagination. The major thing that some TCC elected members often forget is ’Quality of life’ It has now been shown that many people who use that land in pursuit of having a better quality of life would be stopped by this elitist mob who seem to think that academic bragging rights should run roughshod over any simple human desire to fully enjoy access to their chosen hobbies. I like many other long term residents (rate payers) are sick to death of all the BS that issues forth from those pushing their own agendas.


Posted on 27-06-2018 12:47 | By morepork

"... a marine research centre is not for marine use..." That one can definitely be argued; in the long term the knowledge gained benefits all ocean users. The real debate here is between use of land for pleasure and use of land for something more serious. I see good points on both sides of this argument and, at the very least, there should have been much more care when addressing the initial application. If the site is really not suitable, what other sites can be suggested? This issue requires more debate and investigation with due regard to existing users as well as what Acadaemia may need/want.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to make a comment. Login Now
Opinion Poll

Should the speed on SH2, between Katikati and Bethlehem, be reduced to 80km/h?