Bus lane figures are wrong

The bus lane is intended to cover about 450m of Welcome Bay Road.

Claims the council will save five minutes by painting in a 450m bus lane on Welcome Bay Road are refuted by resident Alan Northcote who has been timing the traffic flows this week.

He's become a familiar figure to commuters as they slowly creep by at a speed he estimates to be about 10km/h.

At that speed it takes traffic a little over two minutes to cover the 450m from the Welcome Bay Foodmarket towards the Meadowviews Drive intersection, not the five minutes that the council claims will be saved by giving buses their own lane.

He's been keeping an eye on the traffic since the city council announced it plans to slap a bus lane there sometime over the next two months.

He's got two main issues. Alan says by removing the centre median the council is making a safe road unsafe. And he says the council is rushing. It should wait until the underpass is operational.

'They were indicating they were wanting to get the thing done in May,” says Alan. 'They seem to be wanting to rush this through.”

When the underpass is open traffic will back up on both routes, reducing the tailback on Welcome Bay road, says Alan.

'The traffic's not going to go any faster over the bridge entering turret road,” says Alan. 'But the volume of traffic waiting closer to town will increase considerably. But when the new route fills up, they will use the old route as a rat run. That will happen, they can't stop that.

'Once they have got used to the slowness going under the underpass, when they arrive at the underpass and see it's full, they will carry on up the hill with the people going to Greerton. They will use the old route and merge with it along with the buses.

'Wait till you see how much traffic gets absorbed numerically in that area of both the new road and the existing road, and this will suck up the length of the queue going towards there.”

But like a tsunami the queue does keeping coming, says Alan. But the congestion period is only 7am to 9am on school days. The rest of the day there is a bus expected every 20 minutes, which will be travelling at 60km/h with the rest of the traffic.

'We have got a safe road there at the moment,” says Alan. 'It's going to undermine the safety by having the main stream of traffic going in the middle of the road.”

There are many properties on both sides of the road with street access by single driveway. One such driveway provides street access for about 50 vehicles, says Alan.

At the moment the median strip is used as a safe turning bay going into the dairy. Once a bus lane is painted in, through traffic will be forced to use the bus lane to get past people waiting to turn, says Alan.

'I'm absolutely appalled that they are trying make a major case out of putting a bus lane over 450m of road with four curves in it,” says Alan.

'They are so ingrained in wanting this project to go through that a safety audit will have to be independently done, not by these people that are handling the job at the moment. It wold have to be called by and independent traffic engineer.”

Alan's questions have been put to the Tauranga City Council media team, which is yet to reply.

You may also like....

7 comments

Alan

Posted on 06-04-2018 16:41 | By MISS ADVENTURE

Your views are in fact the real deal on this, they wont want to answer as that isnt going to be easy to dodge the obvious here.


Do the Math Alan

Posted on 06-04-2018 16:42 | By maildrop

To cover 450m in "a little over two minutes" (whatever that means), they would be travelling nearer 14kmph, some 40% faster than you have estimated. Or, if they are travelling at 10kmph, it would take them "a little under three minutes" to cover the 450m. It would serve your cause better if your maths and observations were a little more accurate and scientific. Not sure how you have gathered or recorded the traffic flows but it seems a bit haphazard. Good luck. The bus lanes are a waste of time. We all know that, apart from the loonies.


couldn’t agree more!

Posted on 06-04-2018 17:23 | By Daisychains

Couldnt agree more that the councils rushing things here. Even if they did install a bus lane, one thats 450m is practically pointless. The bus still has to try pull back into the traffic and sit in that traffic anyway! Waiting till the underpass that is also not completely thought through since itll still back up at the bridge! But may aswell wait till that million dollar waste is finished before making another ill thought decision. People cut that medium corner so getting rid of that will be so dangerous also.


Bus Lane

Posted on 07-04-2018 09:15 | By surfsup

For those of us who use this route everyday it is painfully obvious that this is the most stupid idea and will achieve nothing. The local councilors really need to step up and say a big no to this .


There seems to be a tendency...

Posted on 07-04-2018 12:50 | By morepork

...by "people in charge" to believe they have a monopoly on "getting it right" and submissions by other interested parties are just an annoyance to be dismissed, so they can proceed with their own plan. I really hope lessons have been learned from this and Alan's "study" will be fairly reviewed and checked, without fear or favour. It isn't about WHO's right; it is about WHAT's right. Think about that next time you're sitting waiting for the traffic to move...


Problem

Posted on 07-04-2018 12:50 | By rastus

I do not disagree with any of your correspondents however they are misguided if they want to blame the elected council since they get virtually no say when it comes to such matters - these decisions are in the hands of university trained 'experts' who know everything about engineering etc (Look at the mess at the Lakes as an example) We have far too many 'so called' experts on the council payroll and I have yet to have seen any in the past ten years that had a common sense clue in their pointy heads. So if your looking for some common sense in this matter then 'dream on' because it is pretty thin on the ground at council HQ.


@ maildrop

Posted on 07-04-2018 14:35 | By MISS ADVENTURE

I think Alan might be getting at the lunnies here, that if the time to traverse 450m is 2-3 minutes then how is it that TCC are creating a stupid justification that 5 minutes in time would be saved? Impossible, but of course perfect fit for TCC self justifications scams.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.