City transformation or heart transplant

It's clear the so-called ‘city heart transformation' is well underway with millions of ratepayers' money being plastered all over the place to date on plan designs, desires, dreams, wishful thinking and wall-to-wall ivory towers.

Perhaps our (TCC ratepayers not staff) councillors have forgotten who their paymasters are? To date there's no meaningful/informed public consultation. All that's happened/known so far is: CBD council admin-building options of demolish, demolish, demolish. Mayor has slipped out that museum/library full steam ahead and the communications/propaganda/spending is running at full-noise on everything else new in the CBD. Even Durham St gets a make-over?

The end result is a $200+million spend-up by increasing already record levels of borrowing to even more lofty sums. Debt projections from TCC show $545 million already and that does not include the $236 million debt from government that TCC is yet to get its greasy maulers on and spend. Meanwhile Welcome Bay Rd widening is being ignored, multiple expired consents at Te Maunga sewerage plant, improvements spends failed to work, inadequate car parking, other important infrastructure ignored/neglected.

The CBD 'heart transplant' budget approved was $1 million. By 30 June 2016 spent over $1.5-million, by 30 June 2017 near $5 million with no sign of stopping. What happened to accountability, transparency and public consultation?

Tauranga ratepayers need a chance to have a say in a binding referendum.

I Stevenson, Tauranga.

Tauranga City Council declined a right of reply.

3 comments

TCC declined a right of reply?

Posted on 27-10-2017 10:59 | By MISS ADVENTURE

Ohhhhh that means they dont want to fight it, must be the truth!


Right of Reply?

Posted on 30-10-2017 08:57 | By Murray.Guy

Tauranga City Council declined a right of reply? What is the criteria applied by Sunlive that determines who has a 'right of reply'? Certainly had more than my fair share of total bollocks directed at myself with NEVER any 'right of reply'. The writer in this instance is sharing an opinion, a few facts, asking readers a question or two to provoke thinking. Is this part of the MOU with TCC as a 'City Partner'?


Murray on TCC

Posted on 03-11-2017 15:42 | By MISS ADVENTURE

happens every dey, sadly TCC for no apparent good reason are provided the oppurtunity to respond before print, that is a seriously huge advantage that no one else who may or may not be critiqued via media trial gets. Perhsp to be consistent all articles should be provided to any party referred to for their comments before printing? Liek that is going to happen. The only explanation is preference, segragtion ... so then discrimination against any other named contributor save those who pay.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.