Watching the election the other night, I was disappointed to see 46 per cent of those who voted chose to back National, a party that has, in nine years, single-handedly created crises in housing, education and healthcare.
I remember former Prime Minister John Key trumpeting often on television that more and more Kiwis were returning home from Australia, such was our economic prosperity compared to our neighbour's across the ditch. And yet, he didn't think to turn off the immigration tap from other parts of the world; nor did he and his party think ahead and build houses, hospitals, or schools for these returning New Zealanders.
Now John is Sir John, gone to advise an American company on how best to do business in China. He's good with the Chinese, Sir John – he just sold his multimillion dollar Parnell mansion to a Chinese buyer.
Meanwhile, Waikato Hospital is full, and five-year-olds are starting school in classes of 30-plus kids. The average house price in Auckland is still a million dollars, and it's starting to get that way in Tauranga too.
But at least we might get a tax cut. What's the ruination of a country, compared to an extra $20 a week in the wallet?
W Kovacs, Mount Maunganui.


3 comments
classes of 30-plus kids?
Posted on 29-09-2017 14:35 | By MISS ADVENTURE
The number of kids in a class is not an issue at all, the quality and level of education is the real issue.
Election?
Posted on 30-09-2017 15:33 | By phoenix
So you would prefer a dictatorship where only YOUR preferred choice would stand for election.
It's easy.........
Posted on 05-10-2017 10:55 | By groutby
........to knock an incumbent government for doing what they believe is the 'right thing" as far as they are concerned with the limited resources ($$) of a small country without actually offering possible solutions. There will be a reason that 46% did vote for a National based government, so I suspect there will be some over-riding reason why this happened. A thinking voter will know why. Realistically, there will and cannot EVER be a solution to every issue presenting us, it just isn't possible. What can do surely is to do the best we can with what is available to us, and since we have what is referred to as a stable, healthy economy, why would you change for the hell of it?.... you have exercised your democratic right, good on you. In regard to class sizes, 30+ in a public system is fine, the quality is a concern.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.