It’s bad owners, not bad dogs

A local expert believes education will do more to solve the problem of ‘menacing’ dogs than current council programmes. File photo.

A local expert says council plans to deal with menacing dogs will do little to solve the problem, and actively encourages bad dog owners, while punishing good dog owners.

Tauranga Council City Council and Western Bay of Plenty Council recently announced they were to offer an amnesty for owners of menacing dogs by giving them free neutering and microchipping, in addition to a subsidised muzzle and registration.

However, local pet food business owner Nita Maaka says these owners will still have no idea how to rear a dog or change any behaviour of their dogs, and does nothing to stop owners having more menacing dogs in the future.

'All dogs can be menacing, not just certain breeds. In fact out of all the dogs we have done training with, there has actually only been a couple of dogs that I would call menacing, the rest really just had status and boundary issues.”

Nita thinks a better solution would be for the council to create a licensing system funded by the local government and local council dog registration fees.

'Every dog owner has to hold a license, the license system is an opportunity for dog owners to learn about dogs and their behaviour. Just like when you are learning to drive, there are some basics that can save a lot of heartache, because a lot of people do not know how to rear dogs, or how to pro-actively train them into their family lifestyle. A lot of the problems people have is with all breeds, not just so called ‘menacing breeds'.”

'People are very quick to blame dogs for bad or menacing behaviour – but dogs are not born this way, they are reared this way. What the local councils and central government is doing may be a start, but much more can be done to dissolve the problems in the long term. Educate the problem out of society,” says Nita.

Western Bay of Plenty Council compliance and monitoring manager Alison Curtis agrees a de-sexing campaign on its own will not solve the problem.

'It's important to know this current national campaign, supported by both Western Bay and Tauranga City councils, to provide de-sexing for high risk dogs is just the first step in a national action plan to reduce the risk and harm of dog attacks,” says Alison.

'The Department of Internal Affairs has plenty of information from their national survey on reducing dog attacks, which showed respondents believe requiring owners to complete classes, and further education on dog behaviour are the two biggest requirements for reducing dog attacks.

'Our staff work closely with vet services locally to deliver puppy classes to new dog owners. These classes educate dog owners on the positives and pitfalls of dog ownership and provide dog (and owner) training. They are strongly recommended for all new dog owners.”

Tauranga City Council animal services team leader Brent Lincoln says the funding for this programme has largely been provided by central government and has minimal impact on local registration fees.

'One of the proposals from government will require owners of menacing dogs to demonstrate they have the skills and knowledge to manage such a dog. These processes are yet to be developed.”

He says Tauranga City Council has recently employed an education officer and is developing targeted programmes with a view to reducing harm caused by dogs in society.

'Council animal control officers also work with dog owners to help them understand the obligations and responsibilities associated with owning a dog. Generally a dog's demeanour is a combination of the breeding, the dog's personality, and ownership.”

9 comments

All fuzzy

Posted on 06-06-2017 10:29 | By overit

You will attract the good intented owners, unfortunately the bad ones will carry on their merry way causing problems. They


It's both

Posted on 06-06-2017 11:46 | By Chris

It's bad owners AND bad dogs. And there are certain breeds which are simply too risky, no matter who the owner. Offering subsidies to people who have thus far flouted the law is an unbelievable moral hazard and council should be ashamed of the way they spend money.


Licence

Posted on 06-06-2017 14:51 | By chipshop

A licence wont make any difference look how many people drive without one! The compliant will comply and the idiots will continue to cause problems for us all, sad but true.


Lunatics

Posted on 06-06-2017 17:38 | By stokey

This news came at the same time as my annual dog licence renewal form, which until now, I didn't know what it paid for. It is one of those fees that no one in Council can explain? Now I see that in addition to paying for a useless glossy newsletter, it is to subsidize you Morons out there, YES I MEAN YOU, if you can read, who can't bother to love, care for and train their pets- who have a better IQ than you idiot. Council I object to my hard earned money subsidizing these neanderthals who can't do what the rest of us do to make our community and pets safe. Don't penalize me - hammer these mongrels (the people variety) instead. You have the power. Have heavy fines and if they're not paid - seize their cars and get them sold at auction. Problem solved!


Not wise use of money

Posted on 06-06-2017 17:52 | By The Sage

Spend the money on desexing some of the dog owners. There lies your problem. Make them register themselves as a responsible and loving home for a dog.


Dog alone..

Posted on 06-06-2017 18:57 | By Me again

at home,barking most the day, owners at work. Inconsiderate to say the least.. Take the flippant thing with you. We do not need this noise during the day Thank You, Oh in Waimapu Street.


so called menacing dogs

Posted on 07-06-2017 07:48 | By Tyraone

I agree with the article by Nita Maaka. I truly think in most cases the good owners who control and teach their manners are in a lot of instances are subsidising the not so good owners who couldnt give a dam about their dog/s behavior. My dogs are NZ kennel club registered and are show dogs and are taught manners from an early age. Each year I and other NZKC owners are issued a double whammy got to pay council dog rego fees and on top NZ Kennel club rego fees. When I first moved to the BOP there was a scheme that NZ Kennel club registered dogs were issued a decent rebate on dog rego fees What happened to that?? I would like to see that bought back I do not classify my lot as domestic dogs they are worth far.


articke by Nikita Maaka

Posted on 07-06-2017 07:54 | By Tyraone

as I was saying. I would like to know the figures that the free desexing has it been a success? I would like to see good owners given a fair go with reduced rego fees NZ kennel club members the same. thier dogs are to valuable to be allowed to roam, The pedigrees on these dogs are probably longer than yours or mine. Just please give these folk a fair go and punish the bad owners severely and leave us good ones along. Get into these roaming Xbreeds one seldom sees a pure breed roaming?


I AGREE

Posted on 07-06-2017 10:39 | By Laurie

with Nita - it is an owner problem not a dog problem but there is no quick fix or easy answer. Banning specific breeds has been tried in other countries & it doesn't work - this TCC & WBOP Council de-sex & microchip campaign may help a little but the problem is that the target group of idiot owners won't participate even if its free. The dogs owned by these morons are usually the ones involved in the attacks & end up paying the ultimate price where the owners may get a fine which they will just add to the list of other unpaid fines. Harsher penalties would help - as someone else suggested confiscate their car or motorcycle and/or a prison sentence. Licensing owners may help as well but again the idiot factor won't bother until they're apprehended & even then they won't care.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.