Share the ‘nation’s cake’ evenly

Tariana Turia, has excelled herself in the rabid rhetoric and looney logic she employs in her latest ‘NZ Herald' article. It appears the multitude of problems besetting Maori are the result of governmental, departmental and institutional racism.

The fact that twice as many Maori children, under five years old, are referred to CYF she implies is the fault of the department and not an indication of poor parenting.

The fact that health centre research shows Maori suffer poorer health in the areas of obstetrics, heart, renal and mental health she claims are the result of institutional racism with no consideration of self-indulgent lifestyles that may result in these conditions. Which department is responsible for Maori committing crimes?

Her referral to practices in Great Britain have little relevance to New Zealand conditions. We do not have the large number and diversity of immigrants, a reason for the success of Brexit.

What other country would require trainee nurses to study the protocols and absorb the customs of a single ethnic group exclusively as was a requirement in NZ, where many trainees nurses also had to spend a night sleeping on a marae? Were not hospital visiting regulations relaxed to suit Maori cultural

Ms Turia, you would be better employed in encouraging the controllers of the $40 billion Treaty Settlement ‘nest-egg' to spend some of it in solving Maori problems.

None of the self-styled tangata whenua is more than 50 per cent Maori. We are all a mixture of ethnicities and so should regard ourselves as New Zealanders, share the ‘nation's cake' evenly and dispense with egregious claims.

B Johnson, Omokoroa.

2 comments

Well then............

Posted on 09-10-2016 23:10 | By groutby

..anyone have a differing view?..we would like to hear it and compare...sounds fair enough to me. ...Anyone?


Emotional dribble

Posted on 10-10-2016 22:10 | By waxing

B Johnson manages in one breath to accuse Maori of poor parenting, self-indulgent lifestyles, nest-egging and egregious claims (while assuming that his are not). Has he been to the far north, to the east coast, to parts of Waikato and Taranaki? I assume not, since he knows nothing about standards of living in these areas, their unemployment, limited access to schooling and health facilities, poor roading etc. He wants the cake shared equally for all New Zealanders but clearly not those in these areas.He knows nothing about what most Treaty monies have been spent on, just as he knows nothing about the grievances these monies only partially compensate for. I will be delighted to confiscate his property without compensation in light of his position.Hobson recognised (just as the Treaty does) that we are two peoples, and I am proud to have Maori as our tangata whenu


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.