A new council building will not cure the city's heart; to achieve that the council is better to focus on connecting people – that's the advice Tauranga City councillors received from the city's design community.
The collective submission on behalf of 37 architects, architectural graduates, architectural designers, architectural students and landscape architects is one of the reasons why councillors are taking more time out to think through submissions on the Civic Heart proposal, says Mayor Stuart Crosby.
New buildings need to be designed around people says city's design community. Photo: Supplied.
The design community supports the council drive to develop a civic heart in the CBD. But it doesn't entirely support civic buildings being located in one place or concentration, says spokesperson Paulo Shara.
'Activation of the city will not be driven by civic amenities. Activation of the city needs to focus on people. The design community do support development of a vision focused on Tauranga's people.”
The staged development as proposed where city council administration buildings are developed, existing buildings demolished and masonic park redeveloped, will not activate the CBD environment any more than currently.
'The philosophy of 'build it and the people will come' will not work in this instance, unless there is reason for them to come. Activation requires a more considered approach,” says Paulo.
'We support the development of public places for people to gather, talk, enjoy the sun, view and participate in activities, and eat and drink, etc.”
Such spaces need careful consideration in relation to the placement of buildings to ensure outside spaces are inviting and pleasant for people. This includes providing access to sun at all times of day. The current proposal inhibits sunlight in these public spaces because of building scales and locations.
Such spaces need to apportion hard and soft surfaces appropriately. For example, the grassed area on the corner of Wharf Street is not a usable space, says Paulo.
The comfort level of pedestrians needs consideration in design elements if public spaces are to be effective. For example - mitigating against wind tunnelling.
The design collective suggests a vision or "conceptual story" can establish Tauranga city centre as distinctive and/or iconic.
'For example, the current proposal does not talk to the link to the water. It is anticipated the water is a fundamental element in the vision for Tauranga's heart,” says Paulo.
Connectivity is more effective than civic amenities in attracting people. It's a means to encourage people into and throughout the city.
'A city with the right connections will over time develop the values that will foster vibrancy, permeating out from the centre.”
The Civic Heat proposal should include streets in the immediate decision, as a grid setup is a solid principle in urban design and should be enhanced. For example, including Wharf Street & Hamilton Streets in the detailed proposal along with the links beyond.
'The public spaces need strong edges,” says Paulo. 'We recommend a square with active edges on all four sides rather than the street principle currently proposed via Masonic Park.
'We recommend buildings adjacent public spaces are developed and assigned functions that interact with their adjacent public spaces. For example, buildings on Willow Street should open to and be very interactive with the street.”
They support the Art Gallery opening onto Masonic Park provided the council actively works to obtain consent over the private boundaries to Masonic Park, in order to activate all its edges and develop it as a public space.
They say connecting to and activating the water's edge is key.
'Landscaping can decrease the apparent mass of buildings and setbacks adjacent key public spaces could be used to reduce shadowing and enhance open space,” says Paulo.



10 comments
Civic building
Posted on 09-08-2016 10:11 | By surfsup
I would think the majority of ratepayers could have told the council the same thing, but hey we only pay the bills. You only have to look at the farce that wharf street has become To realise the council does not listen. Many complaints have been made about wharf street, it was susposed to be reviewed after a year and despite somehow picking up an award has not achieved the desired results. The proposed development is likely to end up the same.
Hearing test time
Posted on 09-08-2016 10:56 | By tabatha
I know they call this a hearing but perhaps the first test for any hearing is an ear hearing test first to make sure all involved are able to hear all the words, however unfortunately it would be hard to do an intelligent test to see if they can comprehend what is being said.
Speaking of Wharf street
Posted on 09-08-2016 11:17 | By Dazed and Confused
Where are the lights how much did we pay for the lights and when are they going back up? Or when are they being sold to recoup at least some of the cost...Or have they already ended up on someones patio?
Why wait
Posted on 09-08-2016 11:52 | By philiphallen
Why postpone the decision further.. The council have decided that they WILL have their gin palace and no amount of input from people who know what they are talking about will actually be listened too. All us rate payers can do is withhold a sizable chunk of our rates equivalent to the cost of their little hidey hole. The total arrogance of this council is amazing. There is plenty of office space being constructed or in existence outside and within the CBD for them to occupy. Why should they take up prime real estate in the CBD when it could be put to more profitable use?
@ tabatha
Posted on 09-08-2016 13:03 | By Crash test dummies
Yes, a VERY good call on how it really is.
Civic heart
Posted on 09-08-2016 13:43 | By Crash test dummies
Cities don't have heart, people do, so build massive mansions to house mushrooming TCC staff numbers will not help at all. The real issue is here that people are not going to the CBD like before, numbers are dropping. An obvious reason is the challenge to find a car park, the cost of parking also, when the alternate options are somewhat better, easier and more. The result is obvious.
Longer think
Posted on 09-08-2016 13:53 | By overit
At last some sense is being made. I think the Councillors should take longer to think on this one. Whats the hurry anyway. Maybe some new brains after the election should be involved, because I really have no faith in most of what is there now. The CEO needs to go.
Riiight...
Posted on 09-08-2016 14:01 | By Politically Incorrect
Now it makes sense. All the ill-conceived ideas. Council approaches people with a vested interest in something happening, for advice. Of course they want more to happen, they want the design work. Please TCC, why don't you ask us normal folk what we want, then ask the experts how to do it? Otherwise you're using a JCB where a normal fork would do. Maybe SunLive will take submissions, to keep the process fair?!
TCC Council
Posted on 09-08-2016 16:13 | By chatter
The council are elected by the ratepayers of Tauranga & essentially are the ratepayers employees. They are supposed to make decisions for the betterment of the ratepayers and city dwellers. As in any business, where performance is poor or actions are not in the best interest of the employer, those employees can be reprimanded, have their salary reviewed or duly fired from that position. It seems that this Council is running amok with their own agenda and not following the desire of its employer...
Wharf st
Posted on 09-08-2016 16:15 | By Mallyg
Wharf st is just a joke
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.