Your article ‘Who will own the water?' (The Weekend Sun, November 27) raises concerning issues.
Ministers are in confidential discussions with the Iwi Leaders fresh water Forum. The Sapere Report is clear on what Maori believe they are entitled to. This includes preferential decision-making power over access to water and making money out of water.
As for the government shifting the problem to Region Councils, it is happening right now as a perusal of the BOP Regional website shows.
'The Draft Water Quantity Plan Change will give - council will ask tangata whenua to share their values, commercial and cultural interests and aspirations for each river or stream of significance to them within their rohe”.
Hui-a-Iwi are in progress now on marae to discuss the recognition of these so-called ‘values and interests in freshwater'.
Co-governance, co-management, and recognition of unique rights are all in the mix and all to be paid for by ratepayers.
Special rights based on ethnicity will only sow the seeds of resentment and create a divided society.
R Prince, Welcome Bay.


1 comment
Key trogen horse for
Posted on 13-12-2015 21:02 | By crazyhorse
Water was never regarded by the common law as a commodity in that sense. In the cases of Mason v Hill decided in 1833 and Ballard v Tomlinson decided in 1885 the Courts held that a land owner had no right to the ownership of water which either flows thorough, or percolates within that land. In this way the courts recognised that water like air is not only vital to the survival of all species on the planet but is something in which humanity has no hand in creating. It therefore, like air occupies a unique status in the eyes of the common law
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.