Tauranga City Council's plans for the city's new-look waterfront almost didn't make it off the planners' books yesterday as councillors began mulling over perceived flaws in the publicly-supported project.
What was due to be a report on the plan's progress turned into a discussion that threatened to derail – or at least delay – the project in its present form.
An artist's impression of the proposed project. Photo: Supplied.
The first hurdle arose when it emerged that staff were already proceeding to the planning stage acting on public feedback, with finance set aside in the Long Term Plan.
In consultation, the tidal stairs, a pier and pontoon in front of the existing waterfront playground and Hairy Maclary sculptures was identified as the first project for delivery, and received strong backing from the community.
Staff estimate the tidal steps opposite Wharf Street and the Masonic Park can be completed for between $1.9 and $2.6 million.
A pier and pontoon sticking out into the harbour opposite the western end of Masonic Park is estimated to cost about $584,000 at this stage.
However, Mayor Stuart Crosby asked at what point was the project officially approved?
Strategy group general manager Christine Jones says the project is approved with the Long Term Plan budget in mind, which purposefully set aside money for the purpose of waterfront re-development.
But Mayor Crosby replied: 'I think it is a step too far to assume that we have approved this.”
Rick Curach voiced concerns regarding the three knot (walking pace) tide, and says the proposed stairs might have to be shifted.
Creating an embayment to alleviate the perceived tide issue was proposed in the 2008 plan, says strategic planner Adele Hadfield.
Catherine Stewart then questioned the ‘wider issues' that have prompted planners to propose a pier and pontoon immediately instead of rebuilding the Coronation Pier, which was demolished in 2007.
At the time, council replacement plans for the pier were estimated to cost more than $5 million.
There was the wording of Councillor Steve Morris's motion which was that council will consider the project.
'You can always stop it, but you can't speed it up,” says Stuart. 'It sends a message to staff to continue on and do detailed design.”
The LTP identified Access to Water on the Tauranga Waterfront as a priority project for delivery.
Since the LTP was adopted at the end of June this year, a process has been underway to develop a design concept along Tauranga's waterfront.
Projects were prioritised as part of that process, and community engagement took place between November 13 and 24.
The majority of comments were in favour of the project proceeding, and it is currently expected to be completed by the end of 2016.



12 comments
Not happy
Posted on 09-12-2015 08:34 | By nerak
Nobody asked for my thoughts on Christine Jones
A open question to....
Posted on 09-12-2015 08:56 | By Jimmy Ehu
Christine Jones, where do you get the idea that 51% of the cities ratepayers support this?, I have never seen any published figures of a city poll, so does your arrogance know no bounds and to appease all the " talking heads" in various entities you just do what you like, well good luck to the Mayor and Councillors taking on the "power broker" of our city and I for one hope some controls are activated, and I will reiterate what I have stated in a previous post..... show us finished plans and true costs before any work is started so we can make our own judgement, and not have something only a few believe in, let's make our waterfront a place to enjoy by all that a majority support!!!!.
Politics the problem
Posted on 09-12-2015 09:53 | By tgacentral
Access to water on the Strand has been identified as a priority in the Long Term Plan through extensive consultation, consultation has again been undertaken and supported for the proposed stairs and wharf. It is now time to spending time and money asking questions and get it done.
...sigh
Posted on 09-12-2015 10:21 | By yourthumb
I get the intense feeling that there is a significant portion of the Councillors who vehemently oppose turning Tauranga into anything other then what they remember from their summer holidays in the 70s. Maybe I am missing something big, but the only point I see of erecting obstacles in the way of this redevelopment is to stop for some personal reason or to flex your political bicep to show everyone that nothing goes on until you are happy with it.
My prediction nothing will happen
Posted on 09-12-2015 11:42 | By Annalist
My belief is that a huge budget will be spent on designs and talkfests, then when and if a design is semi agreed, one or two councillors or more will de-rail the whole thing and nothing will get done. The mindset of some councillors would probably see them turn down an Eiffel Tower or a Sydney Opera House.
Independent tenders
Posted on 09-12-2015 12:23 | By Towball
Would probably be significantly cheaper if the Council engaged private contractors instead of the same old favouritism shown with every venture. The old boys club looking after each other behind closed doors again. So where does the safety fencing appear to make it safe for all to use, or are council children independent therefore no requiring supervision. Do they have to revamp the waterfront so it looks nice from their office then congratulate each other on how well & how much they benefited from the exercise. Local government same tree different branch of National Government same mentality mindset objectives. Fix with round up.
Pool Fencing
Posted on 09-12-2015 15:24 | By The Beaten Generation
I hope their fencing is compliant
Proposed water front
Posted on 09-12-2015 17:00 | By Starling
Would rather see this project than a museum.
Artists Impression
Posted on 09-12-2015 18:31 | By Incendiary
Not so sure a masted yacht as pictured will fit under the the bridges, would be nice to see some of the junk moored in front of the strand gone most don't move ever, rumour has it half don't even work or have motors
@Starling....
Posted on 09-12-2015 19:31 | By Jimmy Ehu
Define what you think a Museum is?, and if we incorporated some different thinking and use largely what we have scattered around the city, why cannot we have both?.
TOTAL
Posted on 09-12-2015 21:42 | By The Caveman
WASTE OT RATEPAYER MONEY - when are the next local body election - they are a bunch of GONE burgers if the ratepayers have any sense of reality.....
I recall the $millions wasted ...
Posted on 09-12-2015 23:03 | By Murray.Guy
Elected Members supported a public / private partnership to replace Coronation Pier. Ratepayers funded a resource consent at a cost of $500,000.00 and then the 'private partner' walked. When EMs asked of staff if we could recover the money from the private partner advise was 'NO', as staff had proceeded prior to any written agreement. Responsible Councillors have good reason to be hesitant when they are denied meaningful opportunities to monitor, when they have been let down with shonky deals and over the top procurement, so often , costing ratepayers $millions with no accountability. Will this initiative make the slightest difference to the economy of the CBD, I doubt it as 'those looking to wet their feet' are likely going to do so at Pilot Bay, NOT immediately prior to shopping. But, yes, may add to the existing ambiance in the weekends.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.