In his enthusiasm to demonstrate his own omnipotence, Reverend Peter Whitcombe fails to grasp the definition of a secular nation in his comments in last week's church section of The Weekend Sun (October 30).
Clearly no fan of Helen Clark, he decries her comments that New Zealand is a secular nation as being 'antichrist prophetic proclamations” intended to mean that our nation is no longer guided by what he describes as 'traditional biblical values”.
In fact, a secular nation only describes a state that is neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion.
It has nothing to do with a nation's 'traditional values”.
And further, it recognises that those values which Rev Whitcombe defines as 'biblical” are not the sole possession of Christianity. In fact, they are the same core values which are found in every religion and culture, and are cherished by both religious and non-religious alike, including Helen Clark.
D Campbell, Tauranga


2 comments
Good Points made here
Posted on 06-11-2015 15:43 | By kellbell
I think the good Rev would do well to take them on board and perhaps look in the mirror before he goes sounding off about the role of a secular state.
No Neutral in the Secular Gearbox
Posted on 07-11-2015 08:43 | By saltshaker
The secularisation of governance in practice leads to the marginalisation of theistic worldviews and the hegemony of the atheistic worldview; a situation no less suffocating of freedom than that of the church state. Such was the outcome hoped for by George Holyoake when he coined the term secularism in 1851. The problem is that the atheistic worldview corrodes all values to the substitution of its sole value
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.