Repair or rebuild?

Incorporating a city museum into a redeveloped city centre is just one of the options being considered as part of the planning process that Tauranga City Council agreed to this week.

Council involvement in the concept of a museum hasn't been endorsed on record since the overwhelming defeat of adherents of the $23 million over-water proposal in 2007.


Council is getting round to deciding whether to repair or rebuild their HQ on Willow Street in Tauranga. Photo: File.

Since then, museum stalwarts have been promised land at Cliff Road - if they could build the facility without council funding.

And Mayor Stuart Crosby says including a museum in the planning process is no guarantee it will survive.

'We are starting off with a clean slate,” says Stuart. 'Could a museum be integrated into a new updated precinct is a question that will be asked.”

Also to be considered is the proposal to open out the space into a central city plaza, offering pedestrian access through to the waterfront.

'Out of the problem has come a great opportunity,” adds Stuart.

The council is hoping to have narrowed down the options and have a confirmed preference by June next year.

City councillors committed to planning the future of their leaky, mouldy headquarters this week, in one of the shortest council meetings of the triennium.

Most of the 400 council staff were evacuated as soon as the toxic stachybotrus mould was confirmed in December 2014, and are now housed in rented offices around the city.

Investigations since have found that the problem is not an easy, nor a cheap one, to fix and that knocking the existing buildings down and rebuilding is a genuine option.

The council decided this week how those decisions will be approached and made.

'The idea is to go from a large number of options to a preferred option and to take it through a rigorous process to do so,” says project business case consultant Edward Guy.

The programme business case examines each option with three tests: Is it commercially viable? Is it affordable with present funding? And is it achievable and can the council successfully deliver it?

Councillors voted with little discussion, and John Robson says he's comfortable with the approach to what is a very complex project.

'It's a way of working that might be standard operating procedure for other organisations,” says John, 'but I believe it is a step up for us in terms of how we are looking at this project.

'And it does deserve this level of project management.

'I believe it is a very good starting point for what is probably the biggest project this council will undertake in the next few years.”

16 comments

Repair or Rebuild????

Posted on 28-08-2015 09:54 | By nzKIWIgirl

What a laugh! The council will go ahead and rebuild to waste more of our tax payers money!!! For alot of us that live here, I am sure they will agree with me .... why the heck do we need a museum??? We have a place called the Historic museum and that works fine! Do we get a say in the quotes to repair this? Or will it be the most outrageous amount like the ridiculous amount spent on the fencing around the QE Centre @ Memorial Park recently? Pfffftttttt, wake up and spend our tax payers money where it is more importantly needed please!!!


dodo

Posted on 28-08-2015 12:05 | By dumbkof2

the museum brigade is determined to get a museum any way they can. if they want it so bad let them build and finance it them selves let them run it as a business and see how long before it folds


Be more innovative

Posted on 28-08-2015 12:15 | By PeterMcK

a number of more innovative councils are shifting from the Kremlin approach to administration (a single administrative centre) to a distributed or place-based management approach. Experience shows that this both generates savings and more importantly both creates much better Council/community relationships, and allows the different parts of a Council District to further develop their own distinct character. Time for the community to tell the Council it should scope widely, and not just focus on rebuilding or replacing a single administrative centre.


Poll

Posted on 28-08-2015 12:53 | By sangrae

Is it not now the tome for a District wide poll taken on wether we want a museum or not a straight Yes or No will solve this once and for all.Who is Edward Guy another paid servant of the rate payers.


Repair or Rebuild?

Posted on 28-08-2015 13:28 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

From the headline it looks like we have Hobson's Choice. Bad or Bad. There is absolutely no reason that the administration building has to be in the CBD. A small retail outlet in the CBD would do. Do what big companies do and rent! It's tax deductible, gives you choices and there's no surprises. Alas, we will have no say unfortunately - I fear that the decision has already been made, it's a matter of telling us gently.


Council office

Posted on 28-08-2015 14:32 | By Starling

Where or what form the new or refurbished building takes it should NOT include a museum that most rate payers DO NOT WANT. Let those who want a museum not only build but also maintain and staff it with out rate payers funding. Council cannot carry out its job with out an office but does need to own the building?


Get out of the city

Posted on 28-08-2015 14:41 | By Kenworthlogger

Why does the council need to be right in the city? And why does the council need to own the building? Why cant the cou cil rent out of the city somewhere else...?


No Comment Needed

Posted on 28-08-2015 15:03 | By Jitter

Everything I wanted to say has already been covered. I am pleased there are other people who feel the same way I do ie Council offices should be rented and not owned by TCC. The museum brigade should raise the finance themselves and not expect ratepayers to fork out again for another white elephant. However the Museum Trust is not even competant enough to raise the $100,000 required to keep the project going. We don't "need" a museum. It would be a "nice to have" facility.


Simple solution.

Posted on 28-08-2015 17:49 | By dgk

Maybe TCC should use some of the reserve land it wants to sell and build a TCC Admin building on that. Then lease out the existing site to a developer.


Chuck the art gallery out I say

Posted on 28-08-2015 17:55 | By s83cruiser

and move into that building. Art gallery has already cost rate payers millions so lets have the council in there and the artists can fend for themselves like any other citizen in this city.. Why should we fund a special building for them. THAT was a waste of rate payers money from day one.


Financial management Rent vs own

Posted on 28-08-2015 17:58 | By Steve Morris

Commercial rates of return for Tauranga CBD office buildings range from 6-10% p.a. Councils can borrow through LGFA at 2.9% at latest rates. Better for ratepayers to pay 2.9% and own the asset than pay 6 - 10% to a landlord.


Calm Heads

Posted on 28-08-2015 18:04 | By Muz 061

If any of the armchair critics here think they have the knowledge, skill, experience and wisdom to make better decisions than our elected then it's time to start campaigning, not carping. As council functions require long term tenancy with stability then owning your own premises does make sense. A chunk of the cost of many council services goes to wards private enterprise profit. After council ceased employing it's own engineering staff costs of many essential services rose significantly - the profit factor. Let's see plenty of forward-thinking proposals, including provision for a museum mainly funded by a governing board or similar. After all, council owned and maintained reserves are used for our national sporting obsession at ratepayer cost so let's become the last city in NZ to have an actual museum. If we can operate a virtually fiscally neutral art gallery......


SOME ONE IS GOING TO WEAR THIS BULL****

Posted on 28-08-2015 20:31 | By ROCCO

Council has still not revealed the full report on the parlous state of City Hall nor how the mess came about and who was responsible for the fiasco .Nor has it floated all the options or why it took so long to identify a problem and make it public.As for the Museumites here is the message go take a jump you have a $20m Cliff Road site allocated you now want the huge Council site in CBD worth probably $30m with still no parking. You have wasted $100000 in pin money and in 5years it seems you have raised not one dollar.The museum circus should be disbanded now and sent packing.


Muddled Facts

Posted on 29-08-2015 10:19 | By Muz 061

ROCCO seems to have muddled or invented things passed as facts. $20M site - what?! Allocated? I think not!, not even "earmarked". "Museumites" (sounds like a strange cult religion!) wanting the council site??? Get a grip of yourself ROCCO, I doubt they have really had time to think about, let alone discuss such an idea. Andrew Campbell's article is speculative in some areas. What is interesting is the vehement dislike of a museum for Tauranga. I doubt ROCCO has lived in this great city for long enough to share my shame that we are by FAR the most populous town or city NOT to have a museum. And we have some of NZ's best historical stories, Gate Pa being just one.


Financial Nonsense

Posted on 01-09-2015 21:09 | By ROCCO

Muz 061 no you get a grip -a fiscally neutral art gallery indeed I suggest you change your medication.Shame at not having a money draining museum to accommodate the Gate Pa stuff well most of Tauranga wouldn't endorse that emotion.Wallow in your self pity over the lack of a museum but TCC ratepayers will not be funding it.


Muz 061

Posted on 13-09-2015 16:59 | By Kenworthlogger

Moans we will be the last city in NZ to have a museum. Oh boohoo Muz. Who cares? If you are so worried about it either front up with your OWN money to pay for one or move to a city that has one but please stop moaning about it.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.