Changes to work breaks sought

Claims a new bill will see the end of smoko breaks are being refuted by the Government.

Labour MP Andrew Little claims the Employment Relations Amendment Bill is 'mean-spirited and unfair”.


Prime Minister John Key during a visit to the Bay. The Government is seeking changes to the Employment Relations Amendment Bill.

Workplace relations and safety minister Michael Woodhouse says the claims are 'nothing but cynical and create a climate of fear”.

The Government's bill seeks changes to clauses 43 and 46 of the bill – these are the rules that govern rules for employees' entitlements to rest and meal breaks.

The current provision requires employers to provide the employee break and meal times. In a typical working eight hour day these are two 10 minute paid breaks and 30 minutes unpaid meal time.

The new change will see employees still entitled to those beaks but they may be subject to restrictions by the employer.

It will also do away with any prescribed timing for the breaks and says it's up to the employer and employee to negotiate their duration.

'The bill acknowledges that an employee is entitled to rest and meal breaks and balances this with the environment and need of the workplace, by making the rest and meal break rules more practical and flexible,” says Michael.

'Under the bill, employers and employees are able to negotiate when the meal and rest break takes place and how long for. If they can't agree, then the employer can set down the time but this must be reasonable.”

Michael says the bill also puts reasonable limits on when rest breaks and meal breaks can be restricted in certain workplaces, like when healthcare workers are dealing with an emergency for example.

'Employers must also still meet their legal requirements for managing health and safety risks in the workplace when considering rest and meal breaks too.

'The only situations where an employer does not have to give breaks are when the employee agrees, or where the nature of work means the employer can't reasonably allow a break.

'The Government acknowledges that employees need reasonable rest and meal breaks to rest, eat, drink and take care of personal matters and we are committed to ensuring that the right balance is struck between the needs of employers and employees.

'I am confident we have the balance right with this Bill and I look forward to its progression through the House.”

You may also like....

11 comments

Why?

Posted on 25-10-2014 11:47 | By GreertonCynic

Surely places of work "where the nature of work means the employer can't reasonably allow a break" would have systems in place already? Why tinker with everyone else's conditions of employment. One more stick to beat the hapless worker with.


Simple Answer.

Posted on 25-10-2014 12:30 | By tabatha

Apply it to Parliament as well, no tea breaks, start at 8.00 a.m and work to 5.00 p.m. (Some will say they do more then that now) and make sure they are in parliament not having a sleep or rest some where. it always get me how empty parliament can be. Not sure if they have a quorum number. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.


Contradiction Confuses?

Posted on 25-10-2014 12:55 | By Disappointed

How can an employee be "entitled" to a break and at the same time have an employer restrict that break? It is either an entitlement or it is not! Also where does OSH stand on the health and safety issues of working long periods without a break?


Flog the slaves

Posted on 25-10-2014 13:03 | By Baystyle

The Government acknowledges that employees need reasonable rest and meal breaks to rest, eat, drink and take care of personal matters but they will push this bill through anyway!


For goodness sake

Posted on 25-10-2014 14:31 | By Merlin

Words fail me almost.What is wrong with this Governments mentality.More suppression of those trying make a living wage.Things were going ok and why is there this stupid meddling.Now lost for words.


what happens now

Posted on 25-10-2014 15:41 | By rotovend

it appears to me from the info I have read that the Nats are saying same breaks, different times for example if 10am is the busy time where you work you would have your ten minute break at another time, I guess the same would apply for banks and post offices, luch hour for the customers is the busy time therefore staff lunch is later or earlier. Most of us already do things this way. National cant really push anything through unless they get support so I guess we shall see


Another means to deprive workers

Posted on 25-10-2014 17:31 | By Wingnut

As with the employment contracts act, the govt says employees can negotiate their own terms with the employers. The reality is that the employers set the conditions and if you want a job you are forced to accept them no matter how draconian they are. This is 2014 not Victorian times! Work accidents will increase if people do not take regular breaks.


No ideas

Posted on 25-10-2014 19:45 | By maildrop

New term and this is the best they have?


Break at the end of the day.

Posted on 25-10-2014 19:52 | By dgk

Simple, have the break at another time. For example, just after you finish work for the day. That's what National and their supporters want.


chipping away

Posted on 26-10-2014 10:36 | By daboy

they just keep chipping away at our rights soon we will be working christmas day


shiny backsides

Posted on 26-10-2014 21:01 | By mike harman

There is nothing wrong with the breaks the way they are now the politicians need to do some real hard work for a change before they change the breaks


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.