Katikati fish farm in court

Katikati residents David and Helen Stewart are seeking local support in opposition to a neighbouring fish farm proposal that goes to the Environment Court tomorrow.

Kingfish. Photo: Kate Hutson

Local residents, many of whom objected to the fish farm proposal at earlier hearings, were reminded last week with flyers dropped in letter boxes advising of the court date on Tuesday June 26, and asking them to attend.

The Stewarts don't want to live next door to one million kingfish that will be kept in tanks and housed within a building ‘the size of Bunnings' and kept alive by pumps and ventilation fans running 24/7.

They are opposing the Western Bay of Plenty District Council's approval for the farm, which the Stewarts say breaks the council's own rules for rural developments, and have been pushed through in spite of solid opposition for the community.

The applicant is NZ Premium Aquaculture Ltd, with Trevor Davidson listed as the sole director.

The farm has obtained a regional council consent to pipe seawater a kilometre across country to discharge it again into the Uretara Estuary.

Helen says the regional council consent over water discharge into Tauranga Harbour was granted on a non-notified basis, preventing community input or objection.

'Given the polluted state of the Uretara estuary the question remains as to what effect this is likely to have on the water quality of the upper harbour,” says Helen.

'The regional council consent appears to impose no formal process on the application to test and submit such test results on a regular basis.”

The fish farm has also been given consent by the Western BOP District Council for a building 7900m2 in area and up to nine metres in height - about 40 times larger than what is permitted under the district plan, says Helen.

In the original application the applicant claimed the business would produce jobs, says Helen. The application now advises the fish will be killed before being transported to another facility for gutting and filleting, and there will only be jobs on site for six people.

Killing animals for commercial purposes on rural properties is prohibited in the Western Bay of Plenty district.

'We went to a hearing, got all sorts of experts in, and they gave him that land consent one and a half times bigger than a football field.”

In submissions at the consent hearing in November 2011, the Stewart's counsel Kate Barry-Piceno said the application was originally submitted with no planning advice and was deficient when presented, and the council should not have received it.

Aquaculture is not included in the District Plan and the Resource Management Act only refers to aquaculture in the coastal marine environment. The Regional Coastal Environmental Plan is also limited in its definitions. The land-based activity is not covered by the Regional Council.

There should have been a joint hearing with the Regional Council. In Kate's opinion the regional council water consent process was deficient.

'It's been a long process, we've been to hearings, we've been to mediations, and the council changed the rules on us and now we go to court on Tuesday,” says Helen.

They allowed him to have building over 7000m2 at the time the council limit was 200m2.

'A lot of people got upset and sent submission in to argue about this building, and they just changed the rules, said it was ancillary and not to do with the land consent – of course it's to do with the land consent. It's really bizarre.

'This has been going on for two years. He originally applied for hatchery and was put in for submissions on December 23, just at Christmas time,' says Helen. 'Fifty seven people objected to it, which is a lot.”

Kingfish, (Seriola Ialandi Ialandi), are also known as; Yellowtail, Gold Striped Amberjack, Lechas, Magiatiko, Chariteiro and Gelbschwanz.

Kingfish are farmed in the Marlborough Sounds, there was a failed venture in Northland, and there are several kingfish farms in South Australia's Spencer Gulf.

You may also like....

15 comments

Tall poppy syndrome strikes again.....

Posted on 25-06-2012 10:11 | By bopboy

why is it that everytime someone wants to better themselves with a half decent venture that will bring benefit to the community along the way, a bunch of kill joy Nincompoops want to stamp it out??? Good on the Council for pushing this through without the petty narrow mindedness displayed by the few!!!


TYPICAL

Posted on 25-06-2012 10:12 | By PLONKER

Just change the rules to suit the application, sets a wonderful precedent for all.


Overit

Posted on 25-06-2012 14:33 | By overit

I would be skeptical about discharging the used water into the Estuary-this does not sound like a good practise. There will be lots of residues from processed fish food, excrement, possibly anti-biotics. We must try to keep the Harbour and Environs healthy.


Be Careful

Posted on 25-06-2012 15:08 | By Hector

Hell, it could even employ a few people, there are enough "safe practice" rules in place to make sure this is run within boundries, and does not have a detrimental affect on our enviroment, once again, its the same as the Te Puke mining scenario, that was reported on SunLive last week,


Mind your own business

Posted on 25-06-2012 17:07 | By Phailed

would be a good rule for a lot of themoaners. Why is it that everytime someone has a productive idea, the moaners trot out the usual complaints? The one that really gets me is that fish excrement could end up in the harbour! Well hello! Let's hope this environment court sees the benefits of fish farming and rules in favour plus awarding costs. End NIMBYism now - Not in My Backyard. It's strangling the productive and any chance of NZ getting back to earning its keep.


rules....

Posted on 25-06-2012 19:44 | By highlander

To bopboy ningkompoop is you. The people objecting are following the council rules, it is the council changing the rules as they go along. Secondly, how would you like to live next to a plant where environmental and noise pollution is going to be introduced. These plants have worked nowhere in the world, the applicant has no experience in this type of venture, which is not even half decent. the neighbours are not trying to stop progress, they are trying to protect the environment around them.


Hope it happns

Posted on 25-06-2012 20:17 | By critternz

Create another kati business,


great idea

Posted on 26-06-2012 00:04 | By kiwiinaussie

I think it's a brilliant thing for the whole community. Having moved from the bay to Aussie because of work shortages, any new business that will employ people is great for the local economy. It may only employ 6 people but those 6 people will have to live and shop somewhere so the flow on effect will benefit a larger group


Get the facts

Posted on 26-06-2012 10:23 | By Fair Go

To highlander - why not take some time to learn about the application and the business? Kingfish farming is working successfully in over 20 countries around the world, and this business will be completely sustainable i.e. NO environmental impact. Even the fish excrement is going to be turned into compost and the water will go back in the sea cleaner than it came out! Plus there's always the millions of export dollars, jobs being created both directly and indirectly. The applicants are following the council rules too, even though they've been changed on them on more than one occasion.


WATER IN AND OUT

Posted on 05-07-2012 21:37 | By PLONKER

The water in the habour is not that clean, the water treatment will place much cleaner water back in than came out.


GOOD TO HAVE NEW WORK IN TAURANGA

Posted on 06-07-2012 16:25 | By PLONKER

If enough set up and operate then next a processing plant will open and even more work for all, bring it on, sooner better ...


WET FISH CONCEPT

Posted on 08-07-2012 01:43 | By PLONKER

I bet that many a fresh fish will be available to sell, that means more jobs for local BOP people to have, what more do you want?


CAN NOT SEE DRAMA REAONS HERE?

Posted on 12-07-2012 13:51 | By YOGI

Why the complaint, if it was a meat works then the issues raised would be valid but not for this, waste of time and space, send them the bills and costs for it all.


FRESH FISH

Posted on 12-07-2012 22:18 | By YOGI

Great idea, more please


Plorac

Posted on 18-07-2012 19:36 | By Plorac

Uh Oh No matter WHAT its for, Western Bay Council should NOT be changing the rules as it suits. These 'non notifiable' consents are happening far too often and the staff should be made accountable. Its happened in another area of this council in recent years with the resulting noise from generators etc 24/7,trucks in and out all night with radios blaring, and all within a radius of min 30 mtrs max 300 mtrs of long term residents. With the economic situation as it is, Council is desperate for developement to pay its bills....oh and this, AFTER the urban rates go up to help pay the lowered rates of the 'psa' orchardists !!! Cheapo houses coming up in these areas as people give up fighting the rip offs !


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.