Takitimu petition handed over

Those opposing Tauranga City Council's plan to sell off park land bordering Takitimu Drive have petitioned the authorities today.

The petition was presented to the Strategy and Policy committee.


The properties in question. Photo: Supplied.

The land includes seven properties bought by Tauranga City Council to enable the construction of Route P, as it was named before being re-named Takitimu Drive.

The properties are beside the walkway running alongside the road.

After the construction of Takitimu Drive in the 1990s, council decided to keep the land to help mitigation of the noise from the new motorway. The land was subsequently zoned as a park, or residential.

In 2012, council staff changed their mind, and persuaded councillors that the parcels of land were surplus to requirement and officers were asked to investigate their disposal.

The potential sales are part of the larger property land sale plan, which is hoping to bring in $27.7 million over the next 10 years.

Tauranga city councillors have not made a final decision about the sale of the Takitimu Drive lands, and the decision will be made once further consultation is undertaken and submissions are considered.

Council will be undertaking a land sale programme review in the next quarter. The review is to gather detailed information on all properties included in the property land sales plan.

This will include updating value assessments, evaluating the revenue each parcel generates and how much it costs ratepayers at this stage to own and maintain them.

The review will also look at the amenity value and community benefits generated.

The review report on the Takitimu Drive/Avenues properties is expected in September, and will inform further decision-making around the sale of the council-owned properties, say council staff in a prepared statement.

The Takitimu Drive properties are 120 Fourth Avenue, 121 and 127 Fourth Avenue, 98 Fifth Avenue, 97 Sixth Avenue, 99 Sixth Avenue, and 105 Eighth Avenue.

You may also like....

5 comments

Green belt needed

Posted on 28-07-2015 14:30 | By Bill Gibson-Patmore

Woah, woah, woah! councillors must stop for a moment or two. take a good look at the signatures of the petitioners. Realise the passion that exists for retention of what is a magnificent GreenSpace alongside the expressway. The Harbour, glorious on one flank, some housing and some parkland blended together on the other... Nothing could be prettier. This is NOT a utility road, and it's NOT an industrial zone.... It is ALREADY a scenic route into and out of our fine city; a scenic route to the Harbour Bridge and "The Mount", the scenic official route through our city to the Far East Cape and major cities. We happily keep other green assets and roadside landscaping, maintained as beautification projects .... We MUST keep this too. It's a very inexpensive & low-maintenance garden, yet it contributes so much! Bill Gibson-Patmore.


NOT FOR SALE

Posted on 28-07-2015 21:02 | By The Caveman

I am not a total greenie, but those parcels of land should NOT be sold. "In 2012, council staff changed their mind," - they are PAID employees for the ratepayers. You have to ask which developers have wined and dined the council staff that changed their minds and recommended sale !!!! The bottom line is that the land should NOT be sold and it should be planted with native trees etc., to provide a long term habitat, firstly for native birds and secondly for introduced birds. Seems to me that the council officers want to get rid of ALL stands of trees/space of any size. Which developers have their ears???


Land

Posted on 29-07-2015 04:43 | By Kenworthlogger

The council can sell its land just like anyone else... Its not a green space its just not been built on yet...


Green space

Posted on 29-07-2015 10:02 | By YOGI BEAR

In the original plan for the expressway these areas were to be retained because of noise and to retain a margin between and the residential all along the length of the road. So if anything that need remains and continues than at the start.


Agreed

Posted on 29-07-2015 12:39 | By RawPrawn

The factors behind retaining the land as a green space to mitigate motorway impacts have not changed nor diminished. In fact the traffic volume is probably greater now than ever. It seems TCC just want the $$


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.