Twist in crossing closure tale

Tauranga City Council is distancing itself from a decision to close the Seaway Terrace/Ngatai Road walkway.

A council official has told SunLive that it is KiwiRail driving the decision to close the walkway on safety grounds, not the city council.


The Seaway Terrace/Ngatai Road walkway. Photos: File.

However, KiwiRail says it is the council's decision not to pay for an overbridge that is behind the closure.

The informal crossing, which is on a bend, does not meet minimum safety requirements or sightlines, says KiwiRail communications advisor Alexa Langdale.

'Trains travel on this line at 80 kilometres per hour,” says Alexa. 'We require visibility to be 240 metres in each direction. At this crossing the sightlines only reach half of KiwiRail's minimum requirements at 120 metres.

'We can understand this change may cause some frustration, and hope our response helps people better understand why, due to serious safety concerns, KiwiRail believe it's necessary to stop people using it to get from one side of the rail tracks to the other.”

KiwiRail is working to close any crossings that don't meet minimum safety codes if the local councils decide not to bring the crossings up to the required safety standards.

Late last year, KiwiRail and Tauranga City Council discussed an alternative to closing the crossing, which could include funding a grade-separated overbridge. The council, however, decided not to pursue the construction of an overbridge in this location.

'While we appreciate that residents may have used this crossing and the adjoining walkway for many years, our train service frequency is increasing and they are getting longer and heavier,” adds Alexa.

'These factors increase the risk of an incident occurring.

'The use of this line will only increase with the Port of Tauranga expansion, and we cannot allow a dangerous crossing to stay open and risk a tragedy occurring. We urge locals to use the safer alternatives for crossing on Bureta Road and Otumoetai Road.”

Otumoetai ward councillor Catherine Stewart says the decision to close the walkway has not followed due process - something she says residents were promised when the walkway was closed briefly in 2013.

The temporary closure coincided with staff moves to sell off the walkway to save the council the expense of maintaining it.

City council staff approached adjoining landowners 'on their own initiative” to see if there was any interest in buying the walkway land – a move revealed at the Projects and Monitoring Committee meeting of September 23, 2013.

'I've listened to the audio (record of the meeting) and those people were given the assurance that there would be consultation if council were to look at closing it,” says Catherine.

'So it came as a surprise to me a few weeks ago that KiwiRail had decided to close it. About two weeks ago I heard that KiwiRail was deciding to close it, but I hadn't heard anything since 2013.”

According to a city council and KiwiRail press release, the walkway will be closed on April 13 – the same day Seaway Terrace residents intend presenting a second petition on the walkway to the city council.

But Catherine believes the closure date is going to be delayed.

'There's a communication slip-up between our side and the people who live in that area who made the petition to council,” she explains.

'There's still questions. I haven't got the full picture. There's bits of the jigsaw puzzle missing at this stage.”

Resident Doreen Anderson took the previous petition to council and she's preparing to do it again. According to Doreen, locals are confused about what is happening and the short amount of time they have to respond.

'It looks like they might have already made the decision without any recourse to that little word - democracy,” says Doreen.

'This is where Catherine Stewart says they haven't followed due process in council for closing anything. Nobody knows about it but staff. The actual councillors weren't aware of it happening.”

9 comments

Stop fussing

Posted on 08-04-2015 16:36 | By maildrop

Don't waste any more of my money on this please. Let Kiwirail close it and let them police it. Anyone who is so desperate to use it as a shortcut can just carry on doing so. It's only a bit of grass. Don't mention Tsunami Doreen either - if one did come you would get up that grass no problem. Not a big deal so get over it.


If it ain't broke

Posted on 08-04-2015 17:11 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

why fix it?


Here's an idea ...

Posted on 08-04-2015 19:22 | By Murray.Guy

Here's an idea ... slow the trains and increase the warning signs. It's a residential area and frankly NOT unreasonable for residents to also have their well-being considered. As for 'maildrop' and 'get over it'. Council staff intend putting up a fence to stop the walkway from being used, including in an emergency. Councillor's, do NOT agree to the sale of the land. There was NO mention of any over-bridge back in 2013 just an obscene cost ($120,000) to carry out upgrades.


trains

Posted on 08-04-2015 20:36 | By joe p

I agree with Maildrop, let it go, who is going to police it ?, maybe the council can post a sentry there!!!!. Why do we have to be told what we can & cannot do, if one wants to take the risk that's their problem, if you can't see the damn train you should be able to hear the thing surely !!!!. Too many do gooders trying to protect stupid people from themselves. Get off the case !!!


WALK WAY

Posted on 08-04-2015 22:01 | By The Caveman

the way I read all this is that the walkway was there long before the railway arrived. This it is now kiwirails problem to keep the walk way safe. Is there not something about existing user rights!!!!!


Who's going to mow the grass

Posted on 08-04-2015 22:59 | By Brunhilde

I'm interested to know if parks and reserves are still going to mow it and trim the trees? Those trains speed half of the time too, you can tell by the noise they make, walkway was there first so why is kiwi rail not responsible for the over bridge for pedestrians and cyclists.


amazing stupidity

Posted on 09-04-2015 10:27 | By BullShtAlert

What on earth makes people think that it's safe to cross a railway line at an informal crossing? Would you allow your kids to do that? To help Cr Catherine Stewart understand, the rail corridor belongs to Railways, not council. It is up to Railways if they wish to close access, not council. Keep out of it councillors and I hope you don't front up with ratepayers money for an overbridge. Murray Guy's idea about slowing trains doesn't solve the issue. Trains take a long time to stop even at slower speeds. Build your house by a railway line or at sea-level or by a park, and accept the drawbacks. Railways lines shouldn't be walked over fullstop, it sets a bad example for kids. Next council election how about some intelligent readers putting their names forward. Commonsense seems easy to say, but less easy to practice.


But think!

Posted on 09-04-2015 11:31 | By dstewart

It is all very well for the residents to take their lives in their own hands, but do they consider the poor train driver who may be too traumatized after an accident to continue working?


dstewart....you are nuts..!!

Posted on 12-04-2015 21:29 | By groutby

Nothing has happened....nothing is likely to happen..why are we concerned about this at all?...if a pillock wants to get run over by a tri-annual train at 25km/ph...then it's going to happen!!..if we are all as concerned as dstewart is, then we must immediately close all roads and absolutely everything else that we use to live by...just "in case"..I don't know why I am writing this it is just to stupid for words :(..get a grip people!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.