Earthworks opposition heard

Tauriko residents opposed to an extended earthworks development knew the site was zoned for development when they bought their land, according to the developers' counsel.

The Gargan Road land, on the plateau owned by the Tauriko Business Estate, has been zoned for industrial development since before two of the objectors bought their land in 2006 and 2009, says Kate Barry Piceno.


Developers insists that the Gargan Road land has been zoned for development since before 2006.

Some four residents are opposing the resource consent application, disputing the predicted noise levels from the heavy earthmoving machinery that is expected to take three-to-five years.

More than one million cubic metres of soil needs to be removed from the plateau.

They also complain that construction traffic is already using Gargan Road in breach of conditions of a previous resource consent, and that consultation has not occurred as the developers have claimed in the application.

Concerns have also been raised about the impact of vibration on their properties and effect dust could have on their health and lifestyle, which includes an avocado orchard.

A number of residents from The Lakes are also opposing the development on the grounds that a number of trees and shrubs removed during the development will not be replanted until afterwards. The impact on property values is also a concern.

The Lakes 2012 Ltd supports the application in principle, subject to the timing and monitoring of the replanting programme.

Both the earthworks and revised industrial land use layout require resource consent under the District Plan.

A separate application has been made to Bay of Plenty Regional Council for earthworks consent and associated discharges for stormwater and water takes for dust suppression under the Regional Water and Land Plan.

The area of developable industrial land within Stage 2A at Tauriko, through additional excavation of the Gargan Road Plateau, will increase by about 3.46ha. The developable area of Stage 2B will decrease by 1.73ha.

Tauranga City Council senior environmental planner Stacey Hikairo says the adverse effects of granting the consent will be no more than minor, and the council is satisfied consent can be granted.

'It is important to recognise that the landform in this industrial area is anticipated to undergo change and continues to undergo significant change under existing consents and planning frameworks,” says Stacey.

'What is unique in this specific area is the specific controls within the planning framework to ensure adverse visual effects on adjacent sensitive zones are mitigated.”

Tauriko business Estate director Bryce Donne says volcanic pumice beneath around 15 metres of ash on the plateau will be used in the estate as an all-weather lightweight fill in low lying areas. It will also be exported from the site because of demand.

Developer Bob Clarkson's repeated allegations in the media that there is no heavy load bearing industrial land available in the Bay of Plenty have been explored by both TCC and SmartGrowth, says Bryce.

'They have concluded that this is not supported by the facts,” he says.

'We have been strongly encouraged by TCC and the SmartGrowth partners to ensure that an adequate supply of available land is earthworked ready ahead of the market, and in particular heavy load bearing land.”

Because of the topography of the area and the extensive earthworks that are often necessary, this means significant lead times and considerable forward planning.

'We are conscious that the Port of Tauranga is on a continuing growth curve and there is a strong possibility that logistics businesses may wish to relocate to the region,” adds Bryce.

'These businesses are large land users and we need to ensure land is not just zoned but readily available to start building on. Key infrastructure needs to be planned in all cases and constructed where necessary.”

The hearing is before independent commissioner Alan Watson.

7 comments

future growth

Posted on 31-03-2015 13:46 | By rosscoo

50% of residents opposing new before they purchased there land so i say ignore disputes and allow future growth the end result will only increase value. there is always disruptive when building or renovating but most times works out better in end result. so residents get over yourselves and let progress develop for the future and growth of Tauranga


zoned for industrial development

Posted on 31-03-2015 14:26 | By YOGI BEAR

Sorry folks if you purchased after the zone change then you have no right to object to "industrial development" perhaps only the means/how alone at best. you purchased knowing that one day this was a gunna happen. In fact you probably purchased cheap knowing this anyway. Cant claim loss or anything after that now can we.


Growth yes, but not at ANY cost

Posted on 31-03-2015 15:55 | By Red Head

I agree that growth is important for Tauranga but not at any cost. Dig below the surface and ask if this developer is working within the district plan? Or if the documentation to owners and consultative process actually occurred as he says? And is the developer working to the original plan submitted in terms of time-frame and priorities and volumes of earth moved? Look to what was agreed versus what has actually occurred before siding with the developer. More than meets the eye here.


Irony!

Posted on 31-03-2015 16:54 | By laugeo

The developers want to state now that those apposing more development knew about it when they purchased their land. Fair enough you could say? Ironic for me, having been a home owner opposite the Lakes where we purchased in 2001 - we did all the due diligence checks and surveys and at that time the land now developed had been "gifted" to the council as RESERVE. Fair then, to assume that is how it would stay? No, the council simply meet in private and arrogantly change it's use. No consultation or consideration and we certainly didn't know about it when we purchased our property - they also began their earthworks before planning was granted, you might even think they knew they would get permission? Haha - money talks!


Future Growth?

Posted on 31-03-2015 17:04 | By laugeo

Hey rosscoo - what about the other 50%? Ignore them too? Railroad them into liking it? I'm only guessing but maybe this development is not going to negatively impact you? Have a drive around Tauranga and look at the number of empty commercial, retail and industrial units - surely if demand is so high (or going to be) then we should be able to fill what we have before adding more? It is so easy to say go ahead and develop when it is not in your back yard.


...

Posted on 31-03-2015 18:34 | By Em-julianna

%50 of the people living up this road are not the owners they are renting and only a few months ago there was an article about shortage of rental properties in the bay why not finish the projects started and get more houses and buildings put up there before they start forcing more people to find rentals that don't exist


forward planning

Posted on 01-04-2015 04:53 | By rosscoo

hey By laugeo look around all over the city we have empty shops in CBD because of malls going up and been cheaper for businesses to lease. If owners of the industrial sites weren't so greedy and lowered lease then maybe businesses wouldn't need to move to new indutial sites to continue there business.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.