Waitangi hearing on iwi Rena claim

Allegations of secret details of a government deal with the Rena owners and insurers are hoped to become public at a Waitangi Tribunal hearing in Mount Maunganui on Monday.

Motiti iwi representatives say Government breached the Treaty of Waitangi by making confidential agreements with the Rena owners and insurers.

The Rena cargo ship when it struck the Astrolabe Reef in October 2011.

Motiti Island hapu spokesman Buddy Mikaere says the hapu learned of the agreement last November while seeking a Waitangi Tribunal recommendation that the Government enforce the removal notice issued to the owners of the Rena in October 2011.

The container ship struck the Astrolabe Reef about 25km off the coast of Tauranga on October 5, 2011 spilling tonnes of oil that caused one of New Zealand's biggest environmental disasters.

'In the course of preparing for the claim, we found out three confidential agreements signed between the Crown, the owners, and I believe the regional council,” says Buddy at the time.

'I'm not allowed to talk about the contents of those documents because we have had to sign a confidentiality agreement. But one of them we know some of the details about because it has leaked out from another source right back last year - alleging if the government helps the owners to be able to leave the wreck on the reef, they will then pay the government another $10 million dollars.

'So how come you can sign a deal with a foreign company, but not actually talk with us about it? We've been left completely out of the loop. We're saying it's our reef, which we are willing to share with everybody else, but in the traditional way. So it's a clear Treaty breach, which is probably what the Tribunal is more interested in.”

There is a section of the Resource Management Act, where when regional council, and government make decisions, they need to take into account the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, says Buddy.

'Clearly the Crown is in breach of that, and because they are a party to the agreement with the Crown, so are the owners.”

Also for discussion is the hapu appeal against the regional council downgrading the Astrolabe Reef's environmental status in the draft Coastal Management Plan.

Maritime NZ media advisor Steve Rendle says MNZ has two statutory notices in place securing removal of the MV Rena wreck, issued under the Maritime Transport Act 1994.

One notice issued under section 248 of the MTA, determining the MV Rena to be a hazardous ship; and the other under section 100A of the Maritime Transport Act 1994, determining the Rena and its cargo to be a hazard to navigation.

Elaine Butler, on behalf of the Ngai Te Hapu Incorporated Society (known as the Wai 2393 Claimant), brought a Treaty claim under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 on May 28, 2013. That matter is presently before the Waitangi Tribunal, with aspects of the proceedings the subject of confidentiality restrictions.

The confidential documents referred to are the deeds executed in October 2012 settling the Crown's claims and the claims of specific agencies. The deeds contain a clause providing they are confidential between the parties to the deeds.

These deeds are the subject of further consideration by the Waitangi Tribunal. It is not appropriate or possible to comment further at this point, in light of those ongoing proceedings.

The New Zealand Government and Daina Shipping Company (owner of the MV Rena) reached a comprehensive financial settlement in respect of matters arising from the ship's grounding on 5 October 2011.

Daina Shipping Company will pay $27.6 million to settle the claims of the Crown and public bodies including Maritime NZ, Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Environmental Protection Agency, the Minister of Local Government (signing as the territorial authority for Motiti island), and the New Zealand Transport Agency.

"This was a very complex negotiation given the range of issues and parties involved, and represents a good outcome for New Zealanders," says Maritime New Zealand director Keith Manch at the time.

In the event the Rena owners and insurers are granted a resource consent to leave part of the wreck in place, Daina Shipping Company will make an additional payment of $10.4 million to the Crown, reflecting their reduced salvage costs.

10 comments

Does treaty cover shipwrecks

Posted on 30-06-2014 07:20 | By Johnney

Can someone show us the part of the treaty that refer to shipwrecks. There is an old tug scuttled off Motiti so what difference does the remains of Rena make. Do the iwi own the Astrolabe Reef? Are the iwi paying for their court costs. If the confidential agreement was leaked , then who leaked it?


Lets' get real

Posted on 30-06-2014 08:57 | By penguin

It's time for Buddy to relax and join the real world. They have no more 'rights” over the Rena saga than anyone else. Most real Kiwis want the Rena removed in its entirety. But any rational thinking person would appreciate the huge dangers involved in working at the depths in which the ship currently lies. I wonder how Buddy would feel if lives were lost in attempting complete removal? So he maintains that the treaty has been ‘breached,' Maybe he could recruit Maori divers to do the job since he is so insistent that it is 'safe.”


Wrong people for the job!

Posted on 30-06-2014 09:06 | By Mary Faith

In the unlikely event that the remains of the missing plane MH370 are ever located, there is no doubt that means will be found to lift the wreckage from the depths of the ocean - be it 5kms deep or whatever! The Rena owners and their insurers have been negligent right from the start in not employing the appropriate people to get rid of the wreck in its entirety! They are still liable. Nothing short of complete removal will be satisfactory! It is to be hoped that the powers that be will listen to the Maori claims in this instance! Any action - to get rid of the wreck is commendable!


Take it away

Posted on 30-06-2014 13:20 | By DAD

Yes mary is correct, if the right peolpe had been emplyed to remove the wreck in the first place it would all begone now, the insurance and owners have made short cuts and now want to leave the dangerous contaminants and rubbish in our yard!


So What ?

Posted on 30-06-2014 13:42 | By Jitter

Why should the government consult "Maori" on every decision it makes ? There is nothing in the Treaty that supports this claim. I heard Buddy being interviewed on radio where he said he knew what was in "secret deals" Government had made with Rena's owners ! They weren't very secret then were they. What about the secret deals successive governments have made with "Maori" and the Maori Party (a racist organisation in itself) over the years ? Sorry I can't tell you about them otherwise they would no longer be secret ! Chris Finlayson (bless his cotton socks) has stated categorically that the government has not made any secret deals with the Rena's owners. I know who I believe. This is just another unjustified rort by local "Maori" to increase their Waitangi claim. Pietro, you and I pay the iwi court cost as part of the overall deal.


Shipwrecks

Posted on 30-06-2014 13:47 | By YOGI BEAR

The Crown is permitted to make any settlement it desires as Maori agreed that the Queen (therefore the Crown) ceded all rights to QEII in the treaty. The rest is history as they say.


Best of wishes to

Posted on 30-06-2014 16:12 | By robin bell

Ngai Te Hapu,Your rights of 'fisheries' therefore the protection of your reef,is guaranteed in the treaty.On the other hand The Crown and their supporters are as slippery as "tuna" Robin Bell.


correct

Posted on 30-06-2014 18:03 | By Captain Sensible

Yogi Bear is correct. Maori do not own the reef and do not speak for all kiwis.


These comments seem to be more about maori then the removal of the rena.

Posted on 01-07-2014 12:09 | By SpeakMyMind

I my self am a New Zealand Pakeha, I also know that Maori don't own the reef nor do they speak on behalf of all kiwis but from what I have seen and read they are the only ones who are actually trying to do something about this ship. The ship wreck has to go read the reports toxins are being realised daily into our waters. Lives have already been lost 1000 of fish and Birds suffered and are still suffering as a consequence of this. The only thing the government has in mind is the $$$$. I have lived in Papamoa for the last 13 years, When there are big storms you still see the odd clump of oil wash ashore. we don't eat the sea food anymore my children no longer swim at the Papamoa beach due to them getting rashes after swimming.


@ yogi bear

Posted on 05-07-2014 19:10 | By Dollie

You missed out the rest of the sentence ....in return,Maori are guaranteed full rights of ownership of their lands, forests, fisheries and other possessions.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.