Clarkson wants trees gone

Tauranga property developer Bob Clarkson is petitioning council to remove two neighbouring pohutukawa trees he says are causing issues on his property.

The pair of pohutukawa trees outside Bob's Pillans Road house were planted about a decade ago after Bob paid for the removal of two jacaranda trees that preceded them.

Bob Clarkson is seeking the removal of two pohutukawa trees on his Pillans Point property.

The property developer and former Tauranga MP didn't like the jacarandas' habit of dropping long skinny leaves that stick to the concrete and are hard to get rid of.

'So I paid the council $5500 to pull the things down and replace them,” says Bob.

'I never got involved with what to replace them with, because I trusted them. They went and put bloody pohutukawas there, which drop three different types of stuff during the year - from the browny dust with little hairs on it - which really upsets my wife and makes her cough and sneeze – to little yellow things, and leaves. So we get three lots now.”

At this week's Tauranga City Council meeting Bob passed around a shopping bag full of pohutukawa dust that is swept off his deck every week.

He told councillors he originally expected the jacarandas to be replaced with ‘clean' trees like kauri. He would still like kauris in preference to pohutukawa, and he's prepared to pay.

The council is unable to make an immediate decision on information presented during public forums.

City arborist Richard Conning will present a report and councillors will discuss it at the relevant committee meeting before a decision is made.

21 comments

Poor Bob!

Posted on 19-02-2014 07:39 | By Mary Faith

Everyone else has to live with stuff falling off trees - thats what trees do! Why should you get consent to remove the trees when the rest of us live in harmony with them. Hope this is not another case of 'money counts'!


leaves and drains

Posted on 19-02-2014 07:56 | By hapukafin

doesnt the council have paid arbourers on the staff


get real

Posted on 19-02-2014 09:09 | By thebrad

suck it up bob its a tree, i live in papamoa you dont see me going to the counsil with a bag of sand every week if you dont like you have the option to move into an apartment. you are to used to getting what you want in life, maybe this is karma telling you to get stuffed. deal with it we all have.


2nd Ave Pohutukawa's

Posted on 19-02-2014 09:50 | By Gee9000

It will be interesting to see what excuse the council will come up with, to justify removing these pohutukawa tree's because Bob can afford it, but won't remove the 2nd Ave pohutukawa tree's for exactly the same problems they cause the residents in 2nd ave.


Oh - those trees!

Posted on 19-02-2014 10:15 | By SonnyJim

Love them - hate them. You can build a house that conforms to council shading rules, but then destroy the concept by planting boundary trees that shade neighbouring properties for the next hundred years - go figure! And that includes the council road curb plantings that look nice to passing road users, but shade, progressively block views and drains, and drop rubbish like Bob says. Those trees outside Bobs' place have multiple trunks, so they will over time lean lower and lower requiring the chainsaw-prune. Pity they were not originally decent specimen trees with a single stem!


Browny dust

Posted on 19-02-2014 10:22 | By SonnyJim

The dust Bob refers to are seeds. The trees produce them by the millions and if gathered into a jar produce a strong smell/gas that would no doubt trigger an adverse reaction to some people.


How unexpected...

Posted on 19-02-2014 12:17 | By intel1

Property developer finds trees inconvenient. Wow.


.

Posted on 19-02-2014 12:29 | By whatsinaname

what about the silver birch trees that line the streets. I have that much seeds and dust in my house and in the drains etc. also affecting asthma. bet there are others with health problems that these trees affect to.


macmansion woes

Posted on 19-02-2014 13:23 | By rotovend

they are native trees so maybe he should take the time to sit and watch the birds and things that love these trees that he cant deal with. It also appears to make his Macmansion look more appealing.


Ratepayer 2

Posted on 19-02-2014 13:44 | By pakeha2

Well said ratepayer "Oh - those trees! Posted on 19-02-2014 10:15 | By Ratepayer Love them - hate them. You can build a house that conforms to council shading rules, but then destroy the concept by planting boundary trees that shade neighbouring properties for the next hundred years - go figure! - " How can the council act faithfully allowing small sections to be subdivided off and built on and continue to turn a blind eye to the plantings in those areas taking into account the shading factor? When phoned about a problem in this area they say see your lawyer! Not everyone has money to pay for a lawyer. Bamboo is one plant that should be made noxious and forbidden to plant in a city area close to boundaries. Councils are proving to be toothless tigers when challenged about their regulations.!


what next?

Posted on 19-02-2014 14:22 | By s83cruiser

Bob. With all due respect what are you going to want when you find out that the kauri trees, which you would prefer outside your home, also drop leaves and by a quirk of nature shed branches at will. Come up to where I live under a huge Norfolk Pine with two trunks and the 8 street trees directly in front of my home and see what I contend with on a daily basis. If you think you have problems mate you haven't lived yet. If you are successful in your endeavours with the council I will get in touch and you can take a truck load of rubbish from our trees to council and campaign on our behalf.


Attitudes of some

Posted on 19-02-2014 16:45 | By verandric

I'm amazed at the attitudes of some posters here, who seem to think that Bob Clarkson should be punished for being sucessful. We could with more Clarksons in Tauranga.


Hey Bob!!!

Posted on 19-02-2014 18:30 | By Sambo Returns

Just cut the bloody things down, what are the Council going to do?, ask you to stick the branches back on?, if they are on your property, why can you not do what you will with them, the only places for pohutukawas, are the rubbish dump, or the beach, Tauranga is hardly short of them, the problem with the 2nd Avenue debacle, is are they not on Council land?, ie roadside verge, so they have all the say, but on private property????.


A hedge would be better

Posted on 19-02-2014 18:39 | By Honki

to hide that pink monstrosity of a house! Trees shed leaves, pollen, twigs etc. It's called nature, deal with it. Is there by chance a view looking out past the trees?


offer

Posted on 19-02-2014 22:14 | By Capt_Kaveman

them to be put on the main beach at your cost, if i had the money id do it without a 2nd thought, well someone offered the council BBQs and they got put in and they are not even native to the country


verandric

Posted on 20-02-2014 08:20 | By drgoon

Who has said Mr Clarkson should be punished?? Nobody.. Maybe he should have been more specific in his original request. Maybe his ugly house should be removed as it detracts from the natural beauty of the pohutukawa.


the trees

Posted on 20-02-2014 10:47 | By thegoodlife

Are the only thing worth looking at in this picture


Sambo returnith

Posted on 20-02-2014 13:44 | By YOGI BEAR

The photo shows the trees are on the road side, where all the storm, water and sewerage pipes are. Add to that the footpath, curb and road that the trees will deal to in shiort time ...


Easy !

Posted on 21-02-2014 08:04 | By ow

Are they to big to accidentally back over with a delivery truck ? or just join the labour party so you can be on the same side as the council


Please read the RMA first...

Posted on 01-03-2014 23:37 | By Peter Antony

As Bob has already publicly spoken out about cutting down a protect tree, I must warn him of the consequences : What might seem like the easy option, but it can have serious consequences. Local authorities have a range of enforcement tools under the RMA, including taking prosecutions. The maximum penalty under the RMA for an individual is a $300,000 fine or two years' imprisonment, and the maximum for a corporate entity is $600,000, although these penalities would be reserved for the most serious cases. So " Bob" if you think your above the law, go ahead, chop them down. If it is reported in the press that you have, then I will place a judgment against you and insist on the full law of the RMA placed upon you.


Nothing to do with the RMA ...

Posted on 02-03-2014 23:30 | By Murray.Guy

Peter Antony, the trees aren't listed as 'protected' They are, however, trees in the public space and their unauthorised removal can result in the City Council taking action against the offender through the Courts.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.