Maori problems a burden on public purse?

The report in the latest issue of The Weekend Sun, from the BOPDHB is another example of the official, racist preferential treatment of Maori. The report indicates a conciliatory, almost patronising, attitude in its reportage of 'health inequalities for Maori”. They then go on to win an award from IPANZ.
What inequality? Already we have seen great preference given exclusively to Maori. A requirement of nurse trainees to visit maraes and the official need to follow marae protocols in hospitals when they are probably regularly followed in normal life by fewer than 20 per cent of those who claim themselves Tangatawhenua, the 14 per cent of the population.
Visitors' allowances are relaxed to suit Maori, numbers of visitors and length of stay, official forms in both languages are presented to all and many are questioned as to any special requirements they may have as Maori.
These are courtesies not offered to any other ethnic or religious group. These were not promised by the Treaty but just the rights of all citizens.
The poor state of Maori health is the sole responsibility of Maori. No one forces cigarettes into their mouths, poor food and booze into their guts. No one denies them the education that is freely available to all, and without which many become unemployed. No one forces a marked dependency on public welfare.
Maori should therefore consider solving these problems out of the large assets that they have accrued through Treaty settlements and cease to be a continual burden on the public purse. No one should call them disadvantaged.

Bryan Johnson, Omokoroa.

3 comments

Ieuan

Posted on 29-09-2013 10:16 | By Ieuan

Not a single comment from Peter Dey on this, he waxes lyrically several times a day on "Month's Most Comments" with letters from Mary Brooks and C. Humphreys. I totally agree with you, none of us make a whimper about the bending over backwards to get Maori to be vigilant about their own health, yet when they get sick, we throw more money at it. I do not understand why they are tip-toed around, and why special treatment? Anyone who is sick requires the same treatment no matter their skin colour. A hospital is not a marae and the treatment should not be according to ethnicity but to cure the ailment or in many cases, a life-threatening illness. Forget the BS, as you state, their poor health is their sole responsibility. As for the special places reserved for Maori to train, the standard must go way down!


Who waxes lyrical Ieuan?

Posted on 30-09-2013 18:07 | By robin bell

Methinks its you.Maori are vigilant about their health.As usual you ignore the difference between Maori and Pakeha.Their health requirements are infinately more socially orientated than yours,but you don't care about that do you Ieuan.Its not your money Ieuan its "OUR"money the sooner you get that the sooner you will grow up.Poor health in anyone should be treated in the best interests of the patient Maori have the right to the same duty of care as you do,but different,you don't like that do you Ieuan.In a word "Tough"Robin Bell.


I knew you would find me!

Posted on 01-10-2013 17:05 | By Ieuan

I commented to see who noticed. Of course you did. Hospital treatment is the same for everyone, a headache is a headache is a headache! A hospital is not a marae, so just what is the difference in treating Maori. What tikanga is essential for recovering from say an appendictomy? You are sick, you go to hospital, they examine and administer whatever is needed, they operate, you hopefully recover! I googled it and Maori may want a karakia, I want a prayer, they do not want food near body fluids, they want their treasures near them, they want respect. In fact all they demand is what I would get without the treaty being mentioned. Why on earth should medical staff take off their shoes in hospital - their own property, at the patients house maybe, but too too precious to demand unshod feet on their own property! Heaven's above!!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.