1:58:18 Saturday 23 August 2025

Snapper decision 'balanced'

Recreational fishers are quietly pleased with the Government's decision to cut daily bag limits for snapper from nine to seven in an effort to sustain future stocks.

Minister for Primary Industries Nathan Guy announced yesterday snapper bag limits will reduce to seven, with the minimum size raised from 27-30cm. It was an increase on the proposed three a day limit discussed during the public submissions process.

LegaSea, snapper advocacy group, strategist Scott Macindoe says the snapper cuts are a 'slap in the face” for recreational fishers.

The total allowable catch in Snapper Area 1, including the Bay of Plenty, was also increased from 7550 tonnes per year 8050 tonnes per year.

The extra 500 tonnes is allocated to recreational fishers with a commercial allocation of 4550 tonnes and 3050 for the recreational sector. The changes will come into effect on April 1, 2014.

Tauranga Sport Fishing Club captain Gordon Benfell sees it as a balanced outcome for recreational fishers, and what is in the best interest for the country's approach to fisheries management.

'It's not going to please everyone but I think it's a good one,” says Gordon.

'I think those people that are now coming on the media bemoaning the loss of nine smaller snapper are overlooking the fact that the three centimetre long snapper, from 27 to 30, actually have twice the fillet weight.”

Gordon stresses the fishing community need to ensure they are not short sighted with the outcome as these decisions will help sustain and promote growth within the snapper stocks.

Nathan says the decision produces a 'fair and balanced package”, ultimately meaning more fish for both commercial and recreational fishers in the coming years.

'The aim of these measures is to ensure we have a healthy, sustainable stock that will provide for our children and grandchildren,” says Nathan.

'The vast majority of submissions received agree with the principle of rebuilding this stock and sharing this fairly on both recreational and commercial sectors. These changes achieve that.”

But LegaSea, snapper advocacy group, strategist Scott Macindoe is not happy with the Minister's weak decisions in what is a 'slap to the face” of recreational fishers.

Scott says the minister has missed a golden opportunity to cater for the longevity of New Zealand's fishing sector, instead content to keep the commercial sector happy.

'The Minister has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Guided by his malevolent ministry he has decided to crush the fishing of future generations for no real reason and they have played that card to keep the industry off their back,” says Scott.

'What could have been a great decision was ruined by the relatively meaningless attack on the public's fishing interests. The bag limit decrease and size limit increase effectively crush the willingness of the public to conserve.”

5 comments

So Wrong!

Posted on 18-09-2013 11:31 | By Anbob

Mr Benfell and TGFC you have got it so wrong! You certainly do not represent the average recreational fisher.NO COMMERCIAL CUTS, NO COMMERCIAL SIZE REDUCTION (still 25 cm)NO BANNING BULK HARVEST METHODS (main cause of dumping). Yeap you, TGFC and Mr Guy got it so wrong!When you consider all species allocation, the industry currently has allocated 93% of all fish stocks (comm. 410,000 tonnes, recs 25,000). There needs to be concessions made for species important to recreational. The proposed cut to 7 snapper will mean recreational fishers have taken an 80% cut to their bag limit since the qms started , where the industry allocation has had only one relatively small reduction, despite the fact there are far fewer industry participants in the fishery today. Basically MPI proposed cuts are allowing half a dozen major industry participants the bulk of the public resource. Legasea you got so right!


How long

Posted on 18-09-2013 15:09 | By Leadhead

30, 15, 9 then 7......You think that's ok Mr Guy? How long 'till we get to one? The answer lies within the outdated methods & corporate greed of the commercials.


Theodorus

Posted on 18-09-2013 22:50 | By Theodorus

Another stunt.These new rules is what they wanted from the start!


Benfell has no idea

Posted on 19-09-2013 20:49 | By kingfishkiwi

What a load of rubbish from Benfell who claims to represent those within the club by putting his personal views forward in a submission without any consultation or mandate from its members. "Gordon stresses the fishing community need to ensure they are not short sighted with the outcome as these decisions will help sustain and promote growth within the snapper stocks" Are you kidding me?!? The proposed changes wont increase snapper stocks by even 1%. This isnt a sustainability decision, its a decision to ensure that commercial sector are left untouched despite collapsing the fishery in prior decades. Im sure Mr Benfell will be most happy when families who fish from the shore have to throw back most of what they catch so that the commercial sector can scoop them up at 25cm and export them offshore for the benefit of an elite few.


Strange

Posted on 20-09-2013 12:12 | By Anbob

Strange how the area with the most recreational pressure(the Gulf) and least commercial pressure has a higher biomass than the Bay which has a high commercial presence and less recreational pressure. Maybe split the area and have recreational only areas, then see who is decimating the fish stocks.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.