Walking away with disgust

An angry Otumoetai resident is questioning Tauranga City Council's motives as it moves to sell off and close a popular public walkway.

This week TCC sent out letters of interest to Ngatai Road and Seaway Terrace residents stating, for safety reasons, Council is considering permanently closing the accessway and selling the land.

Ngatai Road resident John Buck stands on the public grassed walkway. Photo: Bruce Barnard.

Tauranga City Council communications advisor Marcel Currin says the walkway is being closed for a combination of reasons – including safety and financial concerns.

'It is a very informal walkway that is not well used. There are safety issues with the railway crossing the middle of it, and the walkway is demanding on-going maintenance costs.”

Horrified Ngatai Road residents John and Margaret Buck have lived near the walkway for 17 years and firmly believe it is an integral part of the community and needs to stay.

'There are a lot of people that use it as a walkway, like school children from Otumoetai College if they live down here and by the beach. There's a lot of older people using it for exercise and walking their dogs,” says John.

'It's been a designated walkway for years and years. It's not advertised and unless you know where it is you can walk past it and not notice it, because it looks like you're walking on someone's property.”

He says for many years a neighbour maintained a section of the walkway at no cost to Council, before age caught up with him and he was no longer able to do so. He rang the council alerting of them of this, and the section was added to TCC's maintenance list.

Appalled at Council's decision to close the well-worn community track, John is questioning the true reasoning behind the decision.

'I wonder whether it's because they are cost cutting and think ‘Here's a good way we can get round this, by selling this land'.

'I have lived on the site for the last 17 years and during that time there have been no incidents at the railway line crossing.”

John believes Council have put little forethought into the ramifications of the considered decision. He says if the land at Ngatai Road end is sold contractors will not have access to undertake repairs on infrastructure.

Currently, some properties next to the walkway receive their power, telephone, and soon to be installed broadband connections from the supply cables run from Ngatai Road.

'I don't think they are up with that one; that would be my personal opinion.”

Marcel says there are currently no services in the walkway and is unaware of any plans to put an easement for non-council services.

Although overlooking the walkway by about four metres, John and Margaret are keeping their options open as to whether they will purchase the small section.

'I wouldn't believe I would, but I'm leaving my options open at this time.”

You may also like....

14 comments

Why

Posted on 24-08-2013 08:54 | By Capt_Kaveman

is my question, the residents of this area not asked if they want to keep it open, and or if any wish to maintain it as a community effort?


Marcel go take a look

Posted on 24-08-2013 08:55 | By Brunhilde

I agree about the safety issues... perhaps Marcel should do a bit more research because there are services in this walkway, has he even left his office to have a look so he knows what he is talking about


Boardwalk

Posted on 24-08-2013 09:23 | By Disappointed

Given TCC's recent obsession with removing grass and building boardwalks John and affected residents should ask council to turn this into a boardwalk also. This would remove any safety issues and make it accessible to all members of the community.


An appalling privatisation of public land

Posted on 24-08-2013 11:07 | By Phailed1

Just like when most councillors closed a public walkway over Welcome Bay way a while ago. Walkways and public access were treasures our forefathers fought hard to provide us. What next?


Agenda 21

Posted on 24-08-2013 14:00 | By jameshawthorne

All of our councils are now fully under Agenda 21 - the UN's plan for 'smart growth' mixed with corrupt corporatism. People unfamiliar with Agenda 21 need to research this and get up to speed.(Hamilton may currently be an exception). As is our fake Govt.


walkway maintenance

Posted on 24-08-2013 14:21 | By rosscoo

Should have kept quiet and organised a maintenance schedule amongst yourselves then Council wouldn't have even known anything about it.


Rastus

Posted on 24-08-2013 14:41 | By rastus

James Hawthorne is making IMHO a valid statement that most will look down their noses and guffaw at. But be warned that already there are plenty of signs that this draconian agenda, just like cancer, is slowly taking hold. Many things in our daily life are tied to this lead weight that will eventually drag us all down to the UN's level of expectation - yes that is right - instead of having an agenda that most Kiwi's grow up with naturally - get out and do it, make something of yourself etc etc - the UN wants to drag us all down to meet the low expectations of the third world and once they have achieved that, then the one world order is almost there and the way they are quietly doing this is slowly but surely eroding your rights 'FREEDOM' Many think the Snapper debate is simply one of conservation - Wake up - its got nothing to do with such ideals-its all about slowly taking your rights away from you - its easy to take over fishing companies - not so easy to control thousands of recreational fishermen. If you listen to the recreational fishing organizations they will tell you that its not about low stocks - they believe it is to assist the commercial fishing industry - and in the short term that is what it will do - but then all of a sudden we will find that commercial fishing has to be seriously cut back again using the ecology as the excuse - Ah so you think this is just another conspiracy - well wake up and smell the coffee - it's happening while you are sipping


Shocking

Posted on 24-08-2013 16:41 | By Plonker

Seems a pointless decisions but I guess there are more and more of these rolling through these days. Reflection of what RASTUS says, no real consultation just looking to gradually close down everything. End of it all is to force the public to buy fish ONLY from the supermarket, the changes to the food regulations means that soon a farmers market or selling at a stall anything "food" will be a crime. After that the next planned step is to stop anyone from growing a garden at home for your own use. All part of making everyone dependent on the "system" to supply everything. Once done and a generation passes by then very easy to control everything.


Dopey

Posted on 25-08-2013 08:44 | By pwsimpson@kinect.co.nz

What about a tsunami escape route?? The problem is really council staff trying to justify their job. Been here 5 mins, will not be here in another 5 mins.no feeling for the dynamics of the community and do not care. It stuns me that neighbors not consulted . Smells like this could be a deal with a single neighbor


See for yourself ...

Posted on 25-08-2013 08:58 | By Murray.Guy

A rare direct pedestrian route, Ngatai Road to Beach Road. It has been, in part, maintained by neighbours. There are services in the access way, unseen by staff (see video). Years of neglect by Council has taken it's toll on the access, uneven terrain and dangerous timber steps. Many pedestrian access ways cross railway lines throughout our city with no 'special' safety provisions, nothing unique here. For the City Council to address the issues would require a budget in excess of $100,000, reducing ongoing costs and risk. For the 'private sector to upgrade the access, perhaps a community project, less than $30,000. The space available (say 2m wide), degree of slope in part, the railway, would not enable a wheelchair/cycleway friendly design. Does the cost versus benefit stack up - does to me so far! Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZFwjxqGktg


Dopey

Posted on 25-08-2013 09:25 | By pwsimpson@kinect.co.nz

What about a tsunami escape route.????? Before starting was there any consultation with neighbors or was this a staff decision lacking a full understanding of likely issues. It will staff there wil be a lot of time and cost.


Dopey

Posted on 25-08-2013 09:25 | By pwsimpson@kinect.co.nz

What about a tsunami escape route.????? Before starting was there any consultation with neighbors or was this a staff decision lacking a full understanding of likely issues. It will staff there wil be a lot of time and cost.


Didn't Cr Murray Guy vote to close another walkway ?

Posted on 25-08-2013 10:54 | By Councillorwatch

Correct me if I'm wrong. The one over Welcome Bay way where some residents claimed people committed crime by hopping over fences? What about the rights of people to use that public walkway who purchased their houses in the knowledge that it was there? I think every walkway in Tauranga is in some danger of being closed while these current councillors are in power. Public land is owned by everyone, not just the neighbours. Interesting how Cr Guy now seems to favour this Otumoetai walkway being retained. Election time perhaps????


Councillorwatch asks and Cr. Guy replies

Posted on 25-08-2013 13:30 | By Murray.Guy

"Didn't Cr Murray Guy vote to close another walkway?" Yes, I did support the closing of a walkway at Ohauiti. A walkway that led to nowhere, originally leading to a planned new school that is no longer happening. A walkway that was being used (according to Police and affected residents) to access a cul de sac for criminal and anti-social purposes. There are a number of options for those looking to exercise on hills in that area. The access at risk is unique and provides direct access to the harbour edge. As rightly pointed out, an excellent option in the event of tsunami risk. Alternative access points are a kilometer away in either direction.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.