Seaside village upset by social housing plan

The view across Ōmokoroa harbour, a small village in the Western Bay of Plenty. Photo supplied.

Plans to build 4905 three-storey townhouses and apartments, including social housing, in Ōmokoroa have sent ripples through the sleepy coastal settlement.

The housing intensification plan in suburbs across Aotearoa was introduced in 2021 to increase housing supply, but homeowners had expressed concerns about losing their view, sun and suburb’s character.

Ōmokoroa resident, Bruce McCabe, who chairs the village’s rates and residence association, says many people were worried about losing the Bay of Plenty spot’s character and feel they had not been consulted.

“There hasn’t been much opportunity for locals to give feedback, because before it was going to be the law so there was nothing we could do.

“A lot of us are also really concerned about traffic - it’s going to clog up roads in town and there’s no parking for almost 5000 new houses - imagine how many cars that is going to add around town.

“Then getting into Tauranga which is already the region’s biggest jams on State Highway Two.”

Councillor Margaret Murray Benge says the plan was immoral and the sections were too small.

”Social planning of the very worst kind. The antisocial environment that we will be creating by having these tiny, tiny little sections where you cannot swing a cat. I think is just immoral.”

It was “totally reckless”, councillor Don Thwaites says.

Their objections were aired in a meeting about the plan in February, but last week councillors accepted it, albeit reluctantly, saying they were “between a rock and hard place”, another felt it was like “swallowing a rat”.

New government rules allow three buildings up to 11 metres high on one section without resource consent.

Homes can be close as 1.5m on the front boundary and 1m on the sides and rear.

Two Bay of Plenty towns, Ōmokoroa and Te Puke, had been selected for greater housing intensification to accommodate more people.

Western Bay of Plenty is one of the fastest growing provincial districts, with population projected to increase by up to 20000 more people by 2050.

The Labour Government had made housing density rules mandatory.

The new Government allows councils to make the choice.

Murray-Benge says her preference would have been to table the plan and take it back to the ministers of housing and social housing.

This would risk loss of Government funding already put into the plan, including $47 million from Kainga Ora.

This funding was targeted to allow road upgrades to enable land in Ōmokoroa to be opened up for housing, which was needed in the Bay of Plenty which has a housing shortage, making it one of the country’s most expensive places to live.

The intensification plan was accepted on March 6, with councillors still worried about the proposal.

“Today we have to swallow a dead rat, it’s just a question of which rodent we choose.” says Rodney Joyce.

They had been left with an impossible choice - either reject the “pretty awful planning rules” and risk losing the funding for upgrades, or agree to them and just hope the “damage” was not too much, he says.

They were “basically between a rock and a hard place” and didn’t really have any choice in the matter, says another councillor, Anne Henry.

- Annemarie Quill/ Stuff

You may also like....

11 comments

Times change

Posted on 13-03-2024 14:53 | By nug

I believe given the amount of land available in omokoroa it makes sense...unfortunately you don't get to choose who moves into your neighborhood but that's life.. there will always be the seaside bit where most of us made memories as kids but don't stand in the way of progress......I wonder if the same people complained when the over priced supermarket and surrounding shops were put up? Or maybe when the camp ground started housing family's in need of a place to call home?omokoroa is now a diverse area and it's only getting bigger..as for the traffic woes ...get on your bike with the other 3 people that use the cycle way..


Be worried

Posted on 13-03-2024 15:06 | By Naysay

Indeed the worse kind of development. No plans for policy . No plans to initiate transit housing and holiday home letting. No plans or policy for anything . Look at my Maunganui . Sky high rates yet the neighbour rents out tax free $1000 a night whilst a working family struggle to sleep.
Indeed this is reckless


Th e Master

Posted on 13-03-2024 16:09 | By Ian Stevenson

Typical bad planning/thinking from start to finish.

A better idea would be to build where the work is... Like Te Puke is desperately needed workings for Kiwifruit say 10 months of the year.


Same again?

Posted on 13-03-2024 19:08 | By Duegatti

This sounds like Tauriko West. Are the olannings authority's trying to drive people to gated communities?
The antithesis of kiwi life.


4905 Housing In Omokoroa?

Posted on 14-03-2024 05:50 | By Thats Nice

Let's be straight up here, people actually don't want social housing in their area, and I totally understand that and it's happening everywhere, Papamoa, Te Puke. If these 3-storey apartment properties are built next to your home, what will that do to the value of your property? The traffic congestion is bad enough in this area as it is, and I thought Omokoroa had water supply issues?


NIMBY

Posted on 14-03-2024 08:42 | By Inmediasres

Not in my backyard! Not in my backyard! Not in my backyard!!!!

Omokoroa is a ideal spot for development.

KO is pouring money in the roads to help, take it or leave it.


Plan in haste, repent at leisure.

Posted on 14-03-2024 13:32 | By morepork

Driving back from Auckland the other day, I took the Alfriston/Ardmore road to Papkura, to go via Hunua and cut out the Pokeno stretch of the main highway. As a teenager, I was a student at Ardmore Training College (for teaching...) and remember well the open farmland and pleasant greenery. Not any more. "Community housing" has been poured into this area and it looks like everyone is living on their neighbours doorstep. Planners would justify it by talking about Terraces and Semi-detached housing in the U.K., but this form of living has never been part of the Kiwi lifestyle. Certainly, families have been housed, but it is a horror show. The tragedy is that, once you build it, you can't undo it. Now we are talking the same for Omokoroa and Te Puke. It has to be re-thought, and planners should be forced to drive the road I mentioned.


Boiling frogs

Posted on 14-03-2024 20:40 | By JWJW

Another stunning plan to just keep piling up the number of houses, without bothering with that tiresome development that's needed to support them, such as sufficient road improvements from the off. Rather that build the houses and clog up the roads more, until everyone accepts the traffic as the norm.


@NIMBY

Posted on 15-03-2024 06:46 | By drgoon

KO?? If you mean Kainga Ora, well they don't fund roading.


ha ha

Posted on 15-03-2024 07:58 | By Howbradseesit

Omokoroa, trying so hard to keep the riff raff out. No pity for you though as the rest of Tauranga has these types in their neighbourhooods so did you really think your pleasantville would be exempt?
Now you lot get to share in the joys that social housing offers - noise, gangs, unkempt sections, feral looking people. Hope you get to have all the fun like we do.


Fair

Posted on 16-03-2024 13:03 | By Dee236

I dont care for the home owners. The lands they live on were stolen anyway. Just sounds like the comments are socially and racially motivated.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.