14:45:50 Friday 22 August 2025

Call to end ‘Maori separatism’

Fourth term Rotorua Lakes councillor Mike McVicker and Tauranga-based NZ First MP Clayton Mitchell say they support the views of the lobby group ‘Hobson's Pledge'.

The group, fronted by former National Party leader Don Brash, has been established to end perceived privileges for Maori over non-Maori.


The Tino Rangitira flag. Photo: Supplied.

The group is asking New Zealanders to use their vote in upcoming local body elections to support candidates opposed to ‘separatism and race-based privilege'.

The group names itself after Governor William Hobson's famous remark at the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi: 'He iwi tahi tatou” – "We are now one people”.

Hobson's Pledge encourages people to support 'any party that would vote against all laws, regulations and policies that provide for any entitlement based on ancestry or ethnicity”.

The group takes issue with the Treaty of Waitangi, arguing the Treaty 'did not create a ‘partnership' between Maori and the Crown”.

Hobson's Pledge claims there is no longer any need for the Waitangi Tribunal, or any special Maori representation in government, at either a local or national level.

Mike McVicker's support is influenced by what he sees as local symptoms of a national problem.

'We have a local issue here with the Te Arawa partnership proposal. In May 2013, the mayor indicated she was going to come up with an accommodation for local iwi to have unelected representation, with voting rights, around the council table,” says Mike.

'I have consistently voted against backdoor entries of that nature. I'm standing again in this current election, and one of my billboard headlines is ‘Restore Democracy – No Race-based Appointments', which is a principle shared by Hobson's Pledge.”

Clayton Mitchell says he agrees with the essence of Hobson's Pledge.

'New Zealand First strongly believes race-based laws have no place in society. Any system where a legal privilege is given to someone because of their birth right or the colour of their skin is nothing short of separatism, racism, or apartheid.

"I absolutely support any group acknowledging the fact that you cannot give someone a privilege based on the colour of their skin.

'New Zealand First is colour-blind when it comes to dealing with people, their problems and their needs. We treat everybody equally and so should the law.”

However, Tauranga MP Simon Bridges doubts Hobson's Pledge will gain much traction.

'I certainly don't want to see separatism or favouritism on the basis of race. But I think if you look at the track record of the National government, you'll find that hasn't been what we've done.

"We've been very careful to be even-handed and balanced in our approach, and I don't think the issues Hobson's Pledge and Don Brash have brought up are going to have the traction they once would have,” says Simon.

Waiariki MP and Maori Party leader Te Ururoa Flavell also believes the group will not have much of an impact.

'I'd like to think most reasonable people will see through the rhetoric, and have a real willingness to engage on the issues that really matter,” says Te Ururoa.

'I urge Don and his supporters to take a leaf out of our new Governor General's book. If our Head of State has no difficulty understanding that the Treaty is a partnership between the Crown and Maori, then I can't see why it should be different for anyone else.”

More details on Hobson's Pledge can be found here.

20 comments

Really

Posted on 03-10-2016 09:44 | By overit

I for one will be talking about this issue with my friends and helping it get traction. At last a forum to get behind. Come on NZ this is so important.


Fair call

Posted on 03-10-2016 10:03 | By Crash test dummies

NZ should very much reject separatism and embrace the same laws for all.


Legally privilaged

Posted on 03-10-2016 12:06 | By Gigilo

If the people of New Zealand new the cost of the racially based duality system now operating it would be gone by lunchtime! Open the books and make it public. That is what a normal person would call fair.


Simons Memory slips.

Posted on 03-10-2016 13:03 | By xenasdad

Simon says "I certainly don't want to see separatism or favoritism on the basis of race. But I think if you look at the track record of the National government, you'll find that hasn't been what we've done."What about the water rights? Seabed fiasco?, continual "appointments on race, not by vote?Oh Yes, we see what National has done!


race to govern

Posted on 03-10-2016 13:10 | By jaydeegee

Hang On. engage the brain! Hobson imposed the "English" Legal system on Aotearoa/New Zealand. Is that not law based on the English race? i.e. race based? Why did he not adopt the existing indigenous Maori laws to govern the lawless newcomers, or would that have been race-based? Just wondering.


I agree with Clayton Mitchell

Posted on 03-10-2016 13:36 | By Cydifor

I am a reasonable person and I agree with the mantra of the group - let us all be one people with one set of laws for all. That is the basis of democracy that we are all treated the same and right now we are not. What about Maori-only radio stations, health, housing, sports teams and awards, education, free apprenticeships, and so many more. What about the fact that Maori do not have to achieve the same high pass-mark in university exams? If Maori are over-represented in negative statistics it isn't because no-one has tried, as billions of dollars have been thrown at them. Where is the money from multiple treaty settlements? Good on Don Brash and his team. I have joined it. Several really good Maori are involved in the team. They obviously do not feel that we are one people.


Learn your history

Posted on 03-10-2016 14:00 | By Cydifor

Jaydeegee suggests that the English legal system was imposed on to Maori. Better take a look at the history books Jaydeegee, as it was the Maori chiefs who asked the English to come here to save themselves from each other due to the lawlessness and murder of one tribe on another. There WERE no laws that Maori lived by. They were in danger of becoming an extinct race due to in-fighting between themselves during the Musket Wars. Maori were very afraid of the French and they knew the benign British would be much easier to live with. As Maori then intermarried very quickly with the colonists, that showed acceptance. Colonisation was the best thing that ever happened to Maori. A better way of life with law and order, better housing, health, clothing, transport. Think how great it would be if we all considered ourselves to be one people.


Not before time!

Posted on 03-10-2016 14:18 | By Mackka

It is about time some people with guts and integrity spoke up - everyone too PC in NZ - too afraid they might offend!Well - I say what I feel regardless of PC crap and I'll be in the long line to sign up for this group - long may they reign!


Referendum

Posted on 03-10-2016 14:27 | By Corwen

Simple resolve. Lets have a binding referendum at the next general election. Lets the people of New Zealand make the decision. Simple "YES" or "NO" to the statements on the "Hobson's Pledge" web site under: "We believe that"


@Cydifor

Posted on 03-10-2016 14:31 | By Sam Green

Maori have to achieve the same pass rates in university exams - there are some dispensations for entry in some subject areas. Maori have to obey the same laws of the land just like you. Stop letting the rhetoric get in the way of the facts.


Democracy

Posted on 03-10-2016 16:17 | By Skidmarks

Look up any definition of democracy and you will find three words, or their derivatives, common to all. 'Government', 'Elect' and 'Vote'. Appointing consultants to governments,national or local, to give advice on anything from engineering to Maori culture is fine, but appointing anyone (Maori or otherwise) to any position in a governing body for which they have not been elected or voted for, negates the very definitions of democracy. Do we want our country to be a democracy or not ? Either we do or we don't, else its a bit like asking "how pregnant do you want to be?"


learn your history Cidifor

Posted on 03-10-2016 18:30 | By jaydeegee

Obviously you've never heard of Ius Gentium - Doctrine of discovery. And then there was the Declaration of Independence 1835 signed by total of 52 Maori chiefs.King William IV recognised Maori sovereignty and independent nation status. Of course Maori had laws- Tikanga. As for the Tiriti o Waitangi - you obviously don't know about Contra Proferentem either. The English legal system is race based - end of!


jaydeegee

Posted on 04-10-2016 09:34 | By Anbob

Contra proferentem doesnt mean that one can make it up as it goes. Somehow the interpretation of the treaty now includes partnership, principles etc. You have to look within the four corners of the document. English law provides similar rules/guidelines to basic tikanga principles but unlike tikanga is written. A treaty is between nations, not within a nation. Who knows what King William IV meant and what he said, it is ancient history. Laws evolve and we are living in a totally different world now, with different values. The treaty is very ambiguous, however, Art 3 of the Treaty provides for everyone to be treated the same. English law is not based on race, as it applies to all. Maoris wish for separate seats, unelected seats and privilege (water etc) is race based, end of. Take a step back and look at it through an unbiased lens.


Jaydeegee

Posted on 04-10-2016 16:48 | By Cydifor

Tikanga as described by Rakatau in the Native Land Court in 1870 - "The traditional method of supporting land claims - we took possession in accordance with our customs and caught all the people. The ones who ran away, we killed, and others we killed. The outcome was what occurred on battlefields throughout 2 decades of the tribal musket warfare. They also described their tikanga in preparing the bodies of their victims for the cannibal feast." From Michael King's "Moriori" page 66. Maori chiefs invited the British here to save themselves from becoming extinct through the never-ending tribe-upon tribe massacres. I am sure that you yourself have much European ancestry or possibly Dutch, French, Scandinavian etc. Could you possibly simply celebrate all the parts of your ancestry?


Jaydeegee

Posted on 05-10-2016 13:37 | By Kenworthlogger

The law system we use here treats everyone the same no matter what race they are. A little common sense would tell you that. Please quote me which modern NZ law treats you differently on race basis.


Alice in Wonderland

Posted on 05-10-2016 13:48 | By ROCCO

No place for separatism or racism or special race based privileges just scrap the lot now and move on no ifs and buts.


GO FOR IT

Posted on 05-10-2016 15:34 | By kellbell

The tino flag shown is not the maori flag it is a flag cobbled together a few years ago by some maori interests to "stir the pot'-it has no standing in NZ other than to fuel separatists.`People need to support NZ First to stop this garbage particularly as they will probably have 25 seats in the next Parliament and that will put the cat among the pidgeons-wood or otherwise.


Jaydeegee

Posted on 07-10-2016 09:47 | By jaydeegee

Hobson's Pledge = Hobson's choice!


One People - Which One?

Posted on 09-10-2016 21:59 | By Tumeke Tauranga

Hobson's pledge says that we are one people - but which one have we become??


Maori losses

Posted on 12-10-2016 13:50 | By socantor

So, once again, there are people who are trying to force Maori to assimilate. What's new? Maori have never been asked if they want to be assimilated. White rule must be supreme, or so those people think. Think again! Who would want to join a horrible bunch of bigots? Now, if Maori could truly take part in our governance, then we might start to make some progress.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.