Roundabouts' cost blowout

A $1.5 million overspend on the roundabouts at The Lakes on State Highway 36 and 29 has been approved by the Tauranga City Council.

The project was originally meant to be fully developer-funded through development contributions, but the discovery of unmapped Trustpower cables and a requirement by the New Zealand Transport Agency to change pavement requirements blew the budget.


Tauranga City Council has approved a $1.5 million overspend on the roundabouts at The Lakes on State Highway 36 and 29.Photos: Bruce Barnard.

A shortfall estimated at $490,000 will require some loan funding. The council agreement with the developer is structured so council holds the risk of project cost escalation.

The pavement requirements are greater than those experienced on recent similar projects, says the report to council from asset delivery manager Howard Severinsen.

He says they exceed those recently used on the TEL and require material to be imported from the Waikato.

'This represents NZTA's insistence on receiving a first class asset, signalling movement towards whole-of-life, total cost of ownership principles,” says Howard.

Relocation of services costs were included in the project budget, but they are costing more than expected following the late discovery of unknown power cables, and their consequent relocation costs.

'Unfortunately Trustpower does not subscribe to "dial before you dig" which is a service used by designers and contractors to identify underground services,” says Howard.

'There are very few Trustpower cables in the ground anywhere, in fact most of it is overhead. But we chose the spot where Trustpower has underground cables, unfortunately for us.”

The pavement structure upgrade from NZTA was also a late discovery, coming to council at the beginning of construction, instead of during the design phase.

The project was originally planned to be done in two parts spanning financial years 2016 to 2021 with an overall budget of $3,432,964. Construction was brought forward to align with the opening of the Tauriko Crossing shopping centre and follows a review of traffic modelling.

The engineers estimate for the works was reduced from $3,432,964 to $2,729,150 including 10 per cent contingency.

Councillors voted to move $2,243,150 from the 2019/20 financial year to the 2015/16 financial year to provide the budget for full construction in 2015/16.

The requirement to upgrade the roundabouts to include slip lanes comes from the council City Plan.

Completion of the roundabout works is scheduled to occur in September. The shopping centre opening is planned for late September/early October, but with 50 per cent of the site expected to be open this month – prompting the roundabout upgrades to be completed in the 2015/16 financial year.

You may also like....

35 comments

should

Posted on 25-07-2016 14:47 | By Capt_Kaveman

Have built it properly in the 1st place, this roundabout been a nightmere


here we go again

Posted on 25-07-2016 14:49 | By Smilarkie

........ every day, another cost blow out. Is the Mayor and his staff listening to the people of this city. Seems to be the way that developers get richer, and passs on their cost blowouts to rate payers. WTF, when is enough, enough


Surprise, Surprise !

Posted on 25-07-2016 15:33 | By Jitter

Yeah right ! When a TCC project ever comes to completion on budget or below budget I will be REALLY surprised.


TCC giving in again

Posted on 25-07-2016 15:44 | By hapukafin

If its meant to be developer funded then why is the council changing the rules?Irrespective of what is discovered later it is still the same job and the costing would have been what it will cost now.


In the real world...

Posted on 25-07-2016 15:53 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

A bill would be sent to Trustpower for having cables that were not recorded and another to NZTA for changing the rules. No, sucker ratepayer will pay for negligence once again.


Ramped up costs?

Posted on 25-07-2016 16:19 | By Crash test dummies

So NZTA dictate the costs that TCC have to pay and there is no escape, that or TCC have simply left it (as usual) until done and to late to change anything to both to recognize and advise Councilors on a timely basis. It is as if TCC wants to get rid of this batch of Councilors, looks like that is the public consensus also.


NZTA

Posted on 25-07-2016 16:50 | By Crash test dummies

Required the upgrade of Route K as part of the change over from TCC to them, this is a mandatory cost upon TCC as a consequence only of the decisions of TCC to sell Route K, there is no other excuse.


Developer

Posted on 25-07-2016 16:51 | By Crash test dummies

Obviously has brains enough not to get involved in the job and brains enough to make sure no flow on of this silliness, cost blow outs, NZTA demands and all the rest of it, guess who is silly enough to leave the barn door wide open yet again ...


Developers and costs

Posted on 25-07-2016 16:58 | By BullShtAlert

How many times have we heard that development should go ahead because the developer will pay? Just the other day there was a story about the Clarkson land. Let's hope that doesn't cost ratepayers.


Rubbish

Posted on 25-07-2016 17:09 | By Hot stuff

How can this happen , the consultants are paid huge money before the job even starts How can they stuff it up like this I'm in bussiness and would love to price a job where I can over run It just shouldn't happen in this day and age


Rule not followed?

Posted on 25-07-2016 17:17 | By SonnyJim

"Walk the site" not very thorough? Not everything is on-line, as only all of us know.


on/off ramps?

Posted on 25-07-2016 18:33 | By Crash test dummies

What are these ramps got to do with the lakes or the developer over the road? They have nothing to link them at all, no wonder the developer has no responsibility for the costs blow out. Looks to me that this is a complete cover up, the real deal here is that this is yet another cost of the Route K offload by TCC to NZTA and as a result of the need insisted upon by NZTA that all just adds insult to injury here for TCC ratepayers and the ever growing debt and rates burden.


Trustpower

Posted on 25-07-2016 18:46 | By overit

It would seem that Trustpower must be held accountable too. They are not short of a buck or three.


Whos in charge

Posted on 25-07-2016 19:53 | By hapukafin

The consultancy company has a lot to answer for,not rate payers.


cost blow outs

Posted on 25-07-2016 21:15 | By phoenix

Another stuff-up by experts on huge salaries.The only way for things to improve is compensation from their bank balances.Or let some school students negotiate on behalf of rate-payers who will foot the bill.


This is just stupendous...AGAIN..!!

Posted on 25-07-2016 22:37 | By groutby

so..what does this mean to the average (rate)payer: "signalling movement towards whole of life, total cost of ownership principles"..??..simply bollucks isn't it?..so YET AGAIN.. we have to "duckshove" fictitious money around to pay for someones overpaid "screw up"..will heads roll??..nah..it's not like you actually have to EARN the money is it..??


Heads should roll

Posted on 26-07-2016 08:20 | By nerak

unmapped Trustpower cables? Whose fault? Accountability. Trustpower not going to subscribe to dial before dig, they get more $$ relocating!


really

Posted on 26-07-2016 14:11 | By woodroffe

how on earth is it okay to have unmapped trust power cables!?!And if they were unmapped why? it is not okay for budgets to endlessly blow out


@ nerak

Posted on 26-07-2016 14:17 | By Crash test dummies

Love it, there are stars in TCC but they are being squashed by the heavy burden imposed by the leadership, no leader of small mind wants to have any minion think, create anything better than they could. They don't want anyone stealing their limelight, glamour, Hollywood notions of "its all mine, be reasonable do it my way". You are looking at a suppressive outfit that you either comply or you are gone.


.

Posted on 26-07-2016 16:22 | By whatsinaname

surprise surprise. .


Hwy's

Posted on 26-07-2016 17:20 | By Raewyn

I thought both these roads were Highways so how come Tauranga Ratepayers have to foot the bill. I agree if anyone should Pay it should be the Lakes Developers who have millions! Why do Council keep bowing to these particular Developers and how come they have so much say with Council!


And they want Us...

Posted on 26-07-2016 17:49 | By Dazed and Confused

To Trust them with a 60 70 Million rebuild of the TCC office.Bl@#dy Idiots.


@ Raewyn

Posted on 26-07-2016 22:23 | By Crash test dummies

Sliplanes, these have nothing to do with traffic in or out of the Lakes or anything being developed there now, past present ... The cost is the burden of ratepayers because ratepayers built it, then sold it all to NZTA with a hook in it, TCC had to pay to upgrade the road and related. The roundabout has been a problem for a decade at least, you may recall a truck falling over as the angle on eh roundabout is all wrong.


@ groutby

Posted on 26-07-2016 22:26 | By Crash test dummies

"signalling movement towards whole of life, total cost of ownership principles"..??.. What this means is that TCC has to improve its game a lot, it cant do it cheap and nasty and expect NZTA to end up wearing it. TCC cut corners on everything this is just yet another result of past bad decisions coming back again to haunt ratepayers


TCC Negotiations?

Posted on 26-07-2016 22:28 | By Crash test dummies

It is obvious that TCC with the utmost cleverness and stealthy ability signed up all others, let them all be immune to the blowouts and leave ratepayers carrying the baby yet again. TCC obviously failed to invite the local Kindy members to the negotiation table ... they missed it again and ratepayers end up with the bill ...


Council Contracts

Posted on 27-07-2016 09:35 | By Kenworthlogger

How do i get a contract to do work for the council. Where do i sign up. I make all the money and they take all the risk.. Brilliant....


Unmapped cables

Posted on 27-07-2016 09:49 | By flyingtoaster

Am I wrong in believing the council is at fault here. I am pretty sure some sort of consent is required for any underground services? this should show up on LIM reports.. or can trustpower just go and trench in cables where and whenever it likes, without telling anyone? I have lost confidence in the TCC's ability to do the job they are being paid for. It doesn't seem to matter who we elect. TCC bows to developers and big business, yet us lowly ratepayers are made to jump thru flaming hoops. Us ratepayers always end up footing the bill for cost blowouts, rectifying poor workmanship, and a whole host of things, due to the ineptitude of the TCC. Where is the warranty? There should be a warranty or guarantee for the quality of materials, quality of work, and durability. The rectification work should be picked up by the company that built the roundabout.


Trustpower cables

Posted on 27-07-2016 10:15 | By flyingtoaster

As far as the trustpower cables go, just cut them and bury them again. TCC doesn't own them, and, since Trustpower didn't follow the council rules, and get consent etc, leave it to them to sort it out. Why should ratepayers have to foot the bill?


THESE BOZOS NEED THE BIFFO

Posted on 27-07-2016 19:19 | By ROCCO

Another $1.5m overspend same stuff as the Greerton Pool, Smiths Farm consultation,so on and so on the list is pretty well endless. The continual Council failures cost us millions and millions of dollars. TCC has been stitched up by NZTA and the developers yet again.Guess what no surprise -coming up is the Mount Hotpools money pit where contractors have been there forever and the bloody so called upgrade is still nowhere near finished-on good authority the word on the street is that the cost will not be $500,000 but way over $1million.So brace yourself folks for another bail out by the Councillor clowns and pointy heads for BVL.Solution vote all these non performers out at the elections- the Mayor is gone lets strike out the other 10 pinheads.LOL


BIFFO 2016 BACK

Posted on 28-07-2016 12:49 | By Crash test dummies

Looks to me that you are right ROCCO, the trail of spending and overspending is endless, whatever you look at that TCC is involved in costs plenty then blows out. Very hard to find something that comes in under or the result is better than expected, it is just an impossible thing to happen. Clearly Councilors are not calling the shots or have no idea of what actually is happening under there feet on any day they are there. That being so there is no longer any use for them to remain.


On a good day

Posted on 28-07-2016 12:51 | By Crash test dummies

Road costs and road works are totally ridiculous. What we have here is that even those massive costs for so little even they blow out.


overspend

Posted on 30-07-2016 16:28 | By papakiwi

When eve Coucil are involved in planning and spending ratepayers money on anything major there is always a cost blowout to the detriment of ratepayers. we never hear of Council projects that come in under budget. The Council just don't care if they get the figures right as they know that the ratepayers will be socked with an increase in rates to pay for their gross negligence


Come on people...

Posted on 31-07-2016 13:53 | By GreertonBoy

You aren't supposed to notice all that sort of stuff.... We are supposed to just keep our mouths shut and keep paying... How can the TCC get to do anything if you guys keep noticing stuff? After all, it is in our BEST INTEREST [sacasm] Sheeesh.... nothing to see here, move along, move along (LOL)


@ GreertonBoy

Posted on 02-08-2016 15:08 | By Crash test dummies

So true on that, in fact that is the plan to slide under the radar.


@ papakiwi

Posted on 04-08-2016 02:58 | By Crash test dummies

I think you are very close, however the disasters are not just on the big stuff, it is generally speaking across the board.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.