22:18:40 Wednesday 8 October 2025

Working conditions 'a nightmare'

City finance staff worked in an office with water running down a wall, and carpets so mouldy that unaware visiting councillors could go for a slide.

These are two descriptions that have emerged of what working life was like for Tauranga City Council while working in the now unused civic administration building.


Councillor Gail McIntosh outside the sealed section of the unused Tauranga City Council civic administration building. Photo: File

Councillor Gail McIntosh is chair of the steering committee that has been taking council through the Programme Business Case, leading to the decision to replace the old building.

She says the new building will cost an estimated $5 million a year to run. The existing leaking and mould-infested civic administration building hasn't cost the council anything, she says.

'It hasn't been costing us that because they haven't done any repairs and maintenance in the past years on those buildings,” says Gail. 'And that's why a new building will seem more expensive.

'That's why the building has fallen to bits because they haven't done repairs and maintenance, or done any work on the bloody thing. It's just a nightmare.

'When we saw what they were working in it looked bad enough without the water and the dampness. It was just a rabbit warren. It was really run down. It was horrible.

'I nearly went for a sixer on the carpet, and one of the staff saw me - it was more because my walking was a bit dodgy - but they quickly tacked it down.”

Gail noticed the dampness and the smell. She doesn't know why staff put up with it.

'Why they didn't say, ‘hey things aren't good', and I'm sure they did, and they just got sick of saying it probably. I think they thought because they were so called public servants they couldn't complain.

'I don't think they thought it was getting them sick, it was just a horrible place to live, and they do spend a lot of hours there.

'As an employer I would never get away with providing that for staff, they would never come and work for you. You feel as though you have to provide better. You have to provide for your staff if you want them to be professional and work.”

At this week's meeting where council decided to take the project to public consultation, Gail dared councillors to vote against it.

'Because we know that our staff, it's not their fault they have not been as productive as they could have been over the past 18 months as they have had to work from more than one site.”

The new building is not just for the city council staff, it is also where the public interacts with council staff and officials.

'It's more than just a building for them, it's something for the whole public to take pride in.”

She's looking forward to seeing it, but its completion will be two elections away.

'For some of us it might be two too many.”

She earlier criticised councillor Rick Curach's call for public tours of the building as an election ploy.

'The fact is it would help re-election chances if we opened it up to the public, but I don't think it's the right thing to do.

'Yes, there's a whole pile of people that don't believe that building is in the state that it is in, but they have just got to take our word for it or vote against it, and we have just go to live with that. That's one of the prices of being a democracy.”

Rick wanted those interested to be able to take a 15-20 minute tour of the building, to see why replacement is the best option.

The motion was largely unsupported.

It was pointed out allowing people to tour buildings deemed unhealthy for council to enter into would create serious health and safety issues.

CEO Garry Poole says the rules are for staff not to enter the sealed off areas.

'We are clear that stachybotrus and humans, they are not a good match,” says Garry. 'Safety concerns depend on the individual. We had members of staff who have had absolutely no concerns, and we have had members of staff that actually come down with severe symptoms within an hour.

'You cannot actually make a general statement about what are the symptoms because they are very much dependent on individual circumstances, but they are such that no one would knowingly enter into such an environment.

'We are still working through with some of our staff the residual health issues arising from their exposure from the working environment they have been in for a number of years. The building has been cleaned but we have no guarantee that areas sealed off are safe. That's why they are sealed off.”

Rick says those were long exposures and was suggesting only a brief walk-through. The building has been cleared out with carpets and wall fitting removed.

Councillor John Robson says a walk through will achieve nothing and ratepayers would find more information from the Prendos report on council's website.

'The issues with the building are not just the mould. There are seismic issues and services issues, neither of which will be apparent is a quick walk through.

Kelvin clout and Steve Morris supported the idea of a video drone fly-through.


Toxic mould Stachybotrys was discovered in the old civc administration buildings back in November 2014. Independent investigations revealed significant weathertight problems and building services issues with all four of the buildings. Photo: Bruce Barnard

14 comments

Here we go

Posted on 20-06-2016 10:16 | By Crash test dummies

Making excuses, justifying the unjustifiable ... to get a new lolly pop building so all he misfits are warm, cozy and happy as can be.


Well Put Gail

Posted on 20-06-2016 10:18 | By tabatha

Gail a very good statement, the part that annoys me is why staff put up with it. Most of them would be ratepayers and could have approached their council representative. Who did they tell if they told a manager and why did the manager sit on their hands or was it a directive from on high. If a directive from on high that person/s should be warned, dismissed or suitable hung out to dry. No worker should put up with that situation.


How Could

Posted on 20-06-2016 10:32 | By Merlin

How could the building be let get in this state.Shame on those responsible.This will be the outgoing mayors legacy.


Gail, the senior management knew BUT refused

Posted on 20-06-2016 11:09 | By Murray.Guy

Gail noticed the dampness and the smell. She doesn't know why staff put up with it.


Hmmmm

Posted on 20-06-2016 11:15 | By How about this view!

This is a side step to rival Jonah Lomu. They are tackling the simple issue, "is the building leaking or not?". Well OK, the building is leaking and they don't want to put lipstick on a pig! The bigger issue of course is why build again on the same site? And I think Gail hinted at the answer when she stated "it's something for the whole public to take pride in" and we can't possibly be proud of a building outside of the CBD that has been professionally laid-out to be functional, efficient and built to a budget, but NOT architecturally designed externally can we Gail? Councillors want a functional building for their minions and so do the ratepayers, the issues are COST and LOCATION.


Fenderbender, the cause nothing to do with the Mayor

Posted on 20-06-2016 11:18 | By Murray.Guy

The Mayor is/was not responsible for the operational failure of the senior managers to ensure the building was responsibly maintained. The Mayor and Elected Members, the CEO, are responsible for the processes and outcomes which are equally irresponsible.


Query

Posted on 20-06-2016 13:26 | By Kaimai

Was the CEO's office in such a bad state of repair was well?


What has Gail

Posted on 20-06-2016 13:53 | By Capt_Kaveman

Done for Tauranga over the last 3 years??? almost nothing but now its election year watch them all start crawling back out


Still Confused

Posted on 20-06-2016 15:24 | By Confused

The leaks are occurring in at least 3 separate buildings on the TCC campus. How can that be? These buildings were not even constructed at the same time and now they are in such disrepair that they need to be demolished? What do these 3 buildings have in common? This could only be caused by gross mismanagement and negligence. Either TCC's property managers are incompetent or more likely their requests have been ignored by senior management. Either way, management are responsible for this huge cost to ratepayers and heads should roll.


@Murray. Guy

Posted on 20-06-2016 15:46 | By Taffy

So Murray where does the buck stop? According to the elected members the CEO is their only employee and they are responsible for the remaining.As this has been going on for some years no doubt the present encumbent denies all knowledge.Secondly how many of the current senior managers that had some responsibilty are still employed?Thirdly Murray judging by some of your comments you seem to have known something as this would have occured when you were a Councillor atleast over 3yrs ago.Just for once stop all the B/S and people take some account for their inadequate actions and stop passing the buck.Lastly Murray Why didn,t you push the issue as you seem to have known aboutit? No to some flash building just so it looks and feels like warm and fuzzy to view or work in.


Why does ....

Posted on 20-06-2016 15:46 | By GreertonBoy

every time anything like this needs to be fixed, it always costs so many million dollars? If a building has mould, water is getting in. Find where it is getting in and stop it? That should cost less than a million? If it is bad ventilation.... fix the ventilation? If it is in a humid area, a good air conditioning system will take care of that. Any home owner who has damp issues, would fix the problem, not just buy another home? Oh, that's right, I forgot... home owners would have to use their own money. The mould could probably be removed using heaters to bring the inside temperature to a level the mould cant survive in, then drying with ventilation or air con? I suppose, when one has access to unlimited free money, common sense really isn't needed? Why not admit they just want a flashy new building


How on earth?

Posted on 20-06-2016 15:59 | By stephennel

I believe regular health and safety inspections should have been carried out. Could we please see copies of such inspection reports, say for the past five years?


Flat Roofs

Posted on 20-06-2016 17:41 | By Watchdog

are frequently the problem. The City buildings there seem to be all flat roofed. We had a building I worked in that leaked. The leaks were unstoppable until we put a gabled roof on top. Was fixed in a jiffy! (after everything dried out, that is!


Answer to Taffy

Posted on 20-06-2016 18:12 | By Murray.Guy

The extent of the issues relevant to the mould and associated leaks became known to me some 12 months back when advised by the former staff member responsible for maintenance. The staff member had made numerous requests to those he answered to, for additional remedial support. The buck stops with staff in this instance, being an operational matter. The Mayor and elected members do not walk the corridors with a moisture meter. Had the elected members been requested to approve significant budget requests to carry out critical remedial works and refused such a request, then the buck would stop with them ... but this is not the case. Senior managers still in Council employment? I'm guessing two or three, some re-employed as consultants. I had seen evidence of leaks. Taffy, there's your 'no bull' answers.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.