Tauranga museum one step closer

A pot of gold has been placed at the end of the rainbow.

And Tauranga MP Simon Bridges believes it might be exactly what the city needs to get the museum project off the ground, or at least to find some of the millions required.

It's the Government's Regional Cultural and Heritage Fund – a new multimillion-dollar pot to support regional cultural centres like a museum. 'And Tauranga could be one step closer to finding the money needed,” says Simon.

Cost has often been put up as a block to the museum project even though 71 per cent of Tauranga respondents to a poll commissioned by the MP recently gave a resounding ‘Yes' to the plan.

Simon has been campaigning for a museum on the back of that survey.

'The main concern about the museum is the cost, but the money wouldn't just come from the council,” says Simon. 'We also need to look at ways to get the private sector involved.”

There are thousands of heritage items lying in storage at a Mount Maunganui warehouse. And the MP says those exhibits need to be on display, showcasing the city and its story.

'We have a rich and diverse history and it's a shame we are not embracing it.”

The Government's Regional Culture and Heritage Fund is a fund of last resort. Applicants like the Tauranga City Council would have to show it's prepared to put up its share – and that it's already secured funding from a 'philanthropic contribution” before the fund can contribute on 'a third plus a third plus a third” principle.

Simon believes this is something that can be achieved. 'Especially if we look at more economically viable options.” He means a realistically affordable museum.

TCC is now considering a museum as part of its Civic Space Option – a project on how best develop the CBD. A new city library and a civic square are also in the mix.

'The council will be discussing the best way forward at it's June meeting” says the TCC's general manager city transformation Jaine Lovell-Gadd. 'That could include seeking feedback on a proposal to carry out a more detailed business case on a future museum.”

And exploration of the museum option will include funding options, including the Government's new three-way funding proposal.

That's a fund which has been established to ensure the smaller regional centres get the opportunity to display their treasures, relics and artworks in new museums and galleries.

The Government has also loosened the reins – previously collections had to be of national significance to qualify for funding. That restriction has been removed. The first round of funding opened this week and the first successful applicants will be announced in August.

You may also like....

29 comments

more taxpayer $$$$$

Posted on 22-05-2016 08:34 | By Captain Sensible

"Regional Cultural and Heritage...". When I hear words like this, I want to reach for my revolver.


museum

Posted on 22-05-2016 08:47 | By dumbkof2

as long as the ratepayers of tauranga dont have to pay for it now or in the future


71 % RUBBISH

Posted on 22-05-2016 09:30 | By Dazed and Confused

I sick of the bull dust lets have a proper vote from the rate payers of Tauranga and go with the result My gut tells me the people of Tauranga arnt prepare to fun a new white elephant. Im a supporter of Simon but dont accept this 71 % rubbish


Hmmmm

Posted on 22-05-2016 09:33 | By How about this view!

MORE FUDGING...... When will people understand and accept that the INITIAL MILLIONS is not the end of the story. WE (Ratepayers) then have to fund staffing, heating, air-conditioning, maintenance, exhibitions, purchases and overseas "fact finding" visits, to name just a few additional expenses and all to keep a few bits of shell, stone, cloth, flax and metal warm and dry. A bit of a kick in the "NADS" for those living in a garage or caravan don't you think?


Captain Sensible

Posted on 22-05-2016 09:42 | By Capt_Kaveman

now now we are not the U.S.A just yet, But nz debt clock ( $117B ) is just as bad with TGA following the norm


Which poll is right?

Posted on 22-05-2016 10:03 | By dgk

Sunlive did a poll recently that was the complete opposite of Bridges one. And I'm more likely to believe the Sunlive poll than a politicians poll.


No

Posted on 22-05-2016 11:22 | By Raewyn

Ratepayers don't want or need a Museum why cant you understand!


Honesty requires full disclosure

Posted on 22-05-2016 12:05 | By Annalist

What puts me off a museum is that the Art Gallery proposers initially said all they required from rates was a one million dolalr contribution. That then doubled and then it became about that amount every year. It's not just the millions to build the museum, it's the millions every year for staffing and operational expenditure. This will cripple ratepayers.


as long as it is engaging

Posted on 22-05-2016 13:14 | By snuffy

Our family would love a museum as long as it is engaging and interactive. Not a stiff, clinical, no touching type. I miss that about other cities and the lack of opportunities here to teach children and support each other through our pride of this beautiful place. Especially in winter! I support investment into culture/art/history and Tauranga being a more interesting place to visit. We all love Te Papa, the maritime museum, and the other interactive museums in every NZ city (except ours) and many of our towns too. Benefits to society are too many to name but I have felt a few.


Rastus

Posted on 22-05-2016 13:49 | By rastus

I would suggest that we have a vote at the next election.....on second thoughts forget that because I seem to remember we had a vote on water meters and our council did the opposite of that which the ratepayers voted for so I guess its No No No No No No No............ But you wait and see - the elite will get their jaundiced way.


Simon is right

Posted on 22-05-2016 15:38 | By Jitter

There are thousands of items being stored at the Mount. However if Simon went back over the records he would find that a report done 4 or 5 years ago for TCC by an expert in museum artefacts/museums stated that at least 70% of these "artefacts" should be dumped or returned to the donors. Why ? Because they are worthless rubbish and not worth displaying in a museum. There are far more urgent problems that Tauranga needs to deal with than spending $20 -$30 million plus on a museum which will end up as a massive white elephant supported by ratepayers funds.


@Snuffy

Posted on 22-05-2016 17:59 | By Dazed and Confused

I have time please outline the benefits that are too many to name. And if you could go over the costs at the same time that would help.


dollars

Posted on 22-05-2016 18:10 | By roseh

Simon we are not on your type of wages,Rates are high enough on a pension These kind of things are fine but not if they are going to make our rates go up to fund it year after year.Alright for the rich.I'm quite sure you didn't get 71% support.


Simon Says

Posted on 22-05-2016 19:50 | By sangrae

How many National party members did he poll 100? Perhaps he should poll local ratepayers and residents and will then get truer result, what you think?


Spend up large

Posted on 22-05-2016 21:07 | By Fonzie

Borrow some more money isnt our debt enough yet?


Spending?

Posted on 23-05-2016 11:39 | By Crash test dummies

It is not just the cost up front that is the issue here, sure Government may put up money at the start as may others, however the real burden is the ongoing annual losses and massive spending hat these things create, likely some $8-10m annually.


Poll results

Posted on 23-05-2016 17:29 | By Crash test dummies

The "real" public based poll shows clearly that around 84% against anything that costs TCC ratepayers. No one really cares if there is one or not, what people are concerned about is have millions added to rate annually for a manifestly massive overkill monument to crazed officials seeking to do silly things with others hard earned monies.


@ Fonzie

Posted on 23-05-2016 17:31 | By Crash test dummies

The plan is to rack up a massive rise in debt for next year to around $480-490m and some, they just can not stop spending and borrow all to do so.


Fonzie

Posted on 23-05-2016 21:40 | By Crash test dummies

Sorry, a clearer answer, No they will never stop wanting to spend others money. They think that they know best, they know what others need even when all say "NO", isn't it a strange world.


What Council wants - Council Gets!

Posted on 24-05-2016 14:13 | By Mackka

That's just the way it is - fact of life! Simon has lost all credibility when he says 71% of his survey respondents want a museum. The man has got blinkers on - integrity gone out the window - shame!


@ Mackka

Posted on 28-05-2016 10:50 | By Crash test dummies

What you really mean is Council staff, the Councillors are plastered with whatever required to ensure the desired decision.


Votes

Posted on 31-05-2016 15:40 | By Kenworthlogger

I can see voters next election giving Mr Bridges a miss when remembering cases like this one in this artical. We all know that the figures have been fudged for Mr Bridges poll when the real figures of all other polls to date show a lack of support for a museum.


@ Kenworthlogger

Posted on 04-06-2016 16:42 | By Crash test dummies

Never mind the votes, if this nutty thing happens then who is going to be left to pay the bills? I think better to have left TCC and moved to WBOP then can sit on the right side of the fence and not have to pay for these silly and crazy notions run a riot all over the place.


Jaffa

Posted on 08-06-2016 08:14 | By Kenworthlogger

WBOP council is just as bad if not worse. Rates are over 3 grand now for a house in town.


@ Kenworthlogger

Posted on 15-06-2016 10:27 | By Crash test dummies

Agree $3,000 and some, don't forget to add on the rubbish costs as well they are really part of Council rates to.


It's Laughable

Posted on 18-06-2016 16:04 | By Wingnut

that museum supporters actually believe that this would be a "major tourist attraction" for Tauranga. Really? Yes, I can just see tourists saying " I know lets go to a stuffy museum full of boring artefacts instead of Rotorua's thermal attractions or the Mount Beach".Yeah,right!


@wingnut

Posted on 18-06-2016 23:31 | By Bay Citizen

You seem to be against museums in general as your telling comment about "boring artefacts" suggests. Sure, Rotorua has some great attractions. It also has a rather good museum. What do you suggest Tauranga does instead to attract tourists? We have some good things to do, but if it's a wet day, there is very little to keep a tourist occupied in Tauranga.


@ Bay Citizen

Posted on 20-06-2016 09:58 | By Crash test dummies

It is fair to say Rotorua has a museum, but on any given day there is no one there. The cost to ratepayers is millions annually and as no decent tourist would bother going then the obviously tourist numbers are not a factor when counting the costs. All seems to be self justifying and some, nothing more.


@ wingnut

Posted on 20-06-2016 10:15 | By Crash test dummies

You are right, that is what is propagated, but in end result the rel numbers to any museum are very small, those that do go are mostly kids where teachers are looking to have a lazy period ... this hugely boosts numbers yet is completely meaningless. The whole museum and art scene is a complete scam on ratepayers.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.