Mayor happy with ‘villain’ casting

In his first ‘villainous' role, Tauranga Mayor Stuart Crosby thinks his defence of the city's building fees regime went well.

Stuart's interview with Campbell Live reporter Lachlan Forsyth was on Tuesday and is expected to be aired later this week.


Mayor Stuart Crosby says criticism of the city's building fees regime is misconceived because in Tauranga they are a combination of costs that in other cities and districts are separated.

The television show required a mayoral defence of the city's building consent fees, which are claimed to be the most expensive in the country.

'No doubt I will be the villain in the thing,” says Stuart.

'That's how they do it; they have a victim and a villain, that's how it works. We will see what happens. I think it went well.”

Tauranga is the only city in the country's growth areas of Auckland, Hamilton and Queenstown to separate out development contributions and building impact fees.

'The other three integrate all their costs into section development whereas we split it –some into section development and some into when a new home or commercial building is built,” says Stuart.

'That's the difference. The actual building consenting part, getting plans assessed, paying government levies, doing the building inspections is generally the same around New Zealand.”

For a $300,000 building the consenting fees in Tauranga are about $3800, a little over one per cent of the cost of building.

'And that's about normal up and down New Zealand,” says Stuart.

The people complaining about high fees are not really comparing apples with apples, says Stuart.

The development contribution side, the $18,000 to $20,000 includes the homeowner's cost to obtain the streets, water, sewerage, parks and reserves and council facilities.

'If we had our time over again, and I'm going back to the early ‘90s now, we, in my view, would have it all integrated into the section price,” says Stuart.

'What we were trying to do was to be fairer.

'What we do is we charge the section components for on site costs and we charged the rest which are district wide contributions, when people actually build a house and move into it.”

They created a lost opportunity for council by separating it out, says Stuart, because of the time lag between when the development finishes and the building starts.

Campbell Live's interest in Tauranga follows a story aired in February about Dunedin being the most expensive city in which to build.

The show's makers were contacted by at least one Tauranga builder telling them they were wrong and that Tauranga is the most expensive.

20 comments

Bull

Posted on 06-04-2011 17:20 | By mc

If the $18,0000 is towards Council facilities. What are the rates for then ? and does this mean that if your not a home owner ie tenant, then you get everything in the City for free, courtesy of those who wish to build their own home. Doesn't seem too fair !


Yeah Right

Posted on 06-04-2011 18:22 | By Investigator

Look at the mugshot of the Mayor would you believe the tripe spouted by this individual.The explanation is trotted out so often it is sounding like a cracked record.No one in the building industry believes it no professional associated with the building industry believes it and homeowners certainly don't believe it so draw your own conclusions.If the claims made were valid then developers and subdividers wouldn't be charged anything of consequence and I would love to hear their views on that yarn.


THE HAPPY VILLAIN

Posted on 06-04-2011 19:42 | By TERMITE

That usually happens when the villain has been successful, and you can measure the level of success by the angle of the grin attached to teh muzzle.


tripe

Posted on 06-04-2011 20:54 | By Capt_Kaveman

cleaning streets etc lol what a joke, this is how beer bottles were left in the gutter for 3 days op the bayfair doctors + they seem to clean the drains after the heavy rain, like crap traffic lights where there should be roundabouts, $100k+ into a reef huh what reef


doesn't change the facts at all

Posted on 06-04-2011 21:48 | By Darth Vader

and the facts are mayor Crosby you have "NO" idea what you are talking about, October 2010 I built a 2 bedroom cottage and my building fees were $14,000.00 and my building didn't cost $300,000 so its apparent you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and I will be contacting Campbell live again and provide for them the true facts of costs for building in Tauranga


Victims,Villians & Spin

Posted on 06-04-2011 22:15 | By splitpin

No doubt I will be the villain in the thing,” says Stuart. 'That's how they do it; they have a victim and a villain, that's how it works....." Or is it just spin meeting spin and you become the villian when you can't give simple,honest answers to obvious questions.


Get rid of him!

Posted on 06-04-2011 22:20 | By monty111

Why on earth is this man still the Mayor? He and his cronies have done nothing whatsoever to improve this city. How can he even try to justify these exhorbitant charges. Lets hope when we see him wriggle on the Campbell live show his true colours will show.


The moment of fame alludes

Posted on 07-04-2011 00:40 | By YOGI BEAR

What a day it is to, so much PC and BS from start to finish. Just a normal day at the office ah what ...


Reminds of JC

Posted on 07-04-2011 06:53 | By cinik

John Cleese that is .... I mentioned the war once, but I think I got away with it


Approaching every question with an open mouth

Posted on 07-04-2011 08:49 | By Hebegeebies

The Sheriff of Nottingham (oops Tauranga)has spoken let that be an end to all this speculation about the level of TCC building consent fees.According to the TCC gospel written by St.Steve all Tauranga must know that $19000 in 2011 is the same as $3800 was in 1974 and that is enough justification in itself.So be it I have decreed it and remember if you can keep your head when all those around you are losing theirs perhaps you do not understand the gravity of situation.


TITANIC DECK CHAIRS

Posted on 07-04-2011 21:21 | By SLIPPERY SALAMI

it does not matter what shade of grey they are the result is the same everytime, you just have to look at what you pay, what you pay is how it is and it does not matter what way you twist or turn, slither or slide.


HAT FITS WEAR IT

Posted on 08-04-2011 09:41 | By YOGI BEAR

Once a villain always a villain, it is peasing to see that the Mayor has finally come out and admitted the truth on being a villain. Guess that tenders to place the rest of the article content in some sort of doubt after that right!


WEAR A HAT

Posted on 08-04-2011 11:47 | By TERMITE

Even a hoddy would help so saving money on colouring. A hoddy of course fits a little better with the newly discovered title "Mayor Villainous Maximus"


HUFF AND BUFFALO BILL

Posted on 08-04-2011 16:29 | By Vomit

Ops I mean BILL, it is clear that this Councillor has no idea what is going on at City Hall, of course the place they collect all the MASSIVE building fees is in the basement / ground level so from the lofty hieghts of the top floor there is no way for the Councillors to see anything that is going on. I am sure that it is all so far beneath them, such a trvial thing ... It does not cut into the view so not problem.


THE VILLAIN - CHAPTER ONE

Posted on 08-04-2011 16:50 | By Vomit

Cease power and eliminate any oppostion to that power, it is a simple case of: if you are not for me then you are against me. Take a leaf out the book of history anywhere through time: Gadaffi, Hitler, Muldoon, Stalin, Ceaser and in fact almost any dictator.


HMMM ... VILLAINS - CHAPTER TWO

Posted on 08-04-2011 17:26 | By Vomit

Find out who your friends are and keep them at a safe distance, what you are left with is your enermies, keep them close as you can. he best way to do that is to give them what ever they want, when they want. Collect taxes anyway you can the aim being to keep the massives poor and of course woring harder and harder to try and make ends met. While they are so busy they can not think about what ever else you are doing.


CHAPER THREE - PINOT IN HAND

Posted on 11-04-2011 17:53 | By TERMITE

That would have to be next, layed back and enjoy the spoils of war ...


HOCHIN'S MATE

Posted on 14-04-2011 04:21 | By WOMBLE

Guess that is about as good as it gets, through US$300,000 at it and loose it, then plead for name surpression for 6-7 years in the hope that it all goes away and gets forgotten.


THE VILLIANS NAME IS

Posted on 14-04-2011 14:54 | By GROMIT

Sounds better as Al Capone, has a more meaningful and of course inspirational ring to it.


CROC FOOD

Posted on 14-04-2011 15:04 | By BUSHWACKER

Out back and villains we can catch we just drop them in the nearest watering hole, tie em up to a pole and leave them to it. If we are lucky the pole is still there in the mornin ready for teh next one.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.